Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗹𝟳

Channel

𝗹𝟳

@poxatiaka_al

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003879949440
TypeChannel
Username@poxatiaka_al
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 11 April 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/poxatiaka_al

Growth

232.57 August 2026 — 2 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 07:182-1
14 Aug 2026, 17:543+1
14 Aug 2026, 02:172no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:162first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

874 reactions across 19 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.50% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5406974710216944218839.50%
custom 5377649674247244459809.15%
custom 5458598542077614465809.15%
custom 5438389217711394845718.12%
custom 5467596159260332288697.89%
custom 5465628888145093159637.21%
custom 5415804565977075917606.86%
❤‍🔥596.75%
custom 5469695590814225375556.29%
custom 5368473794446911334333.78%
🔥293.32%
💘283.20%
custom 5440463201584052689242.75%
custom 5228843363976908410222.52%
💊202.29%
161.83%
custom 5310077774118015166141.60%
custom 5447318510554336087131.49%
custom 5467653196426021303131.49%
80.915%
9 further kinds343.89%

Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 874 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
126
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 19 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
23
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @poxatiaka_al. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 April 2026 to 5 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 May 2026, 19:56 UTC742 views58 reactions23 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Тут стало модно быть бездушной тварью, красивой с виду, а в душе гнилой, всё повторять и быть, как обезьяна. Не модно нынче быть собой. Добро не ценится и нет во что-то веры, обману все легко так поддаются. Тут все кричат, что знают себе цену, а знают, потому что продаются 🩶

custom 537764967424724445914custom 546759615926033228810❤‍🔥5custom 54069747102169442185custom 54158045659770759175custom 54676531964260213035custom 53100777741180151664custom 54696955908142253754

Signed ᅠㅤ𝚜¹ོ ㅤ

17 May 2026, 13:43 UTC718 views48 reactions4 Starsread 14 August 2026
Voice message

🎀

custom 54675961592603322888custom 54069747102169442185custom 54696955908142253755💋4custom 53100777741180151664custom 54158045659770759174custom 54383892177113948454custom 54585985420776144654

Signed ᅠㅤ𝚜¹ོ ㅤ

17 May 2026, 13:43 UTC863 views48 reactions2 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Кто чужому счастью завидует, тот своего не увидит 🌟

custom 54675961592603322887custom 53100777741180151666custom 54656288881450931595custom 54696955908142253755❤‍🔥4custom 53776496742472444594custom 54158045659770759174custom 54676531964260213034

Signed ᅠㅤ𝚜¹ོ ㅤ

14 May 2026, 13:10 UTC554 views46 reactions2 Starsread 14 August 2026
File

Mzade Que Rico 🎼

❤‍🔥6custom 54158045659770759176custom 54585985420776144656🔥4custom 53776496742472444594custom 54383892177113948454custom 54696955908142253754custom 52288433639769084103

Signed ㅤ𝟎 𝟎 𝟏 🪐 ㅤ

14 May 2026, 13:09 UTC630 views42 reactions3 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

«Если бы предательство прощалось, дьявол сидел бы рядом с Богом»

custom 54069747102169442186custom 543838921771139484564custom 53776496742472444594custom 54585985420776144654💊3💔3custom 54158045659770759173

Signed ㅤ𝟎 𝟎 𝟏 🪐 ㅤ

10 May 2026, 19:20 UTC886 views47 reactions3 Starsread 14 August 2026
Voice message

🩶

custom 54158045659770759178custom 54656288881450931597custom 54383892177113948456custom 53776496742472444594custom 54069747102169442184❤‍🔥3🐳3🔥3

Signed ㅤ𝟎 𝟎 𝟏 🪐 ㅤ

10 May 2026, 19:20 UTC809 views50 reactions5 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

<<Рыба с закрытым ртом никогда не попадется на крючок>>🌟

custom 545859854207761446510custom 54675961592603322886custom 54696955908142253756custom 541580456597707591754custom 53776496742472444594custom 54383892177113948454💊3

Signed ㅤ𝟎 𝟎 𝟏 🪐 ㅤ

8 May 2026, 14:44 UTC657 views43 reactions10 Starsread 14 August 2026
Voice message

💕

custom 54675961592603322888❤‍🔥5custom 54069747102169442185custom 54656288881450931594custom 54696955908142253754💘3custom 53776496742472444593custom 54158045659770759173

Signed ㅤ𝟎 𝟎 𝟏 🪐 ㅤ

8 May 2026, 14:43 UTC977 views50 reactions10 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Хуже всего к вам будут относиться люди, к которым вы относились лучше всего 🤍

custom 54585985420776144659custom 54675961592603322887custom 52288433639769084106custom 53776496742472444594custom 54069747102169442184custom 54158045659770759174custom 54383892177113948454custom 54696955908142253754

Signed ㅤ𝟎 𝟎 𝟏 🪐 ㅤ

6 May 2026, 14:39 UTC840 views42 reactions4 Starsread 14 August 2026
Voice message

🎀

custom 54585985420776144656custom 54656288881450931595custom 52288433639769084104custom 53776496742472444594custom 54069747102169442184custom 54158045659770759174❤‍🔥3💊3

Signed ㅤ𝟎 𝟎 𝟏 🪐 ㅤ

6 May 2026, 14:38 UTC860 views46 reactions6 Starsread 14 August 2026
Photo

<<Гордость может сделать человека сильным, но не счастливым>>🌑

custom 53776496742472444596custom 54069747102169442185❤‍🔥4💘4custom 54158045659770759174custom 54383892177113948454custom 54585985420776144654custom 54656288881450931594

Signed ㅤ𝟎 𝟎 𝟏 🪐 ㅤ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @poxatiaka_al. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 826,460 of 1,629,497 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗹𝟳” (@poxatiaka_al), 2 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poxatiaka_al.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.