6 measurements spanning 20 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,086–1,099 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 18:11
1,087
-1
22 Aug 2026, 19:14
1,088
-3
12 Aug 2026, 18:43
1,091
-3
9 Aug 2026, 13:12
1,094
-3
6 Aug 2026, 12:19
1,097
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:54
1,097
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 20 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
110 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
47
42.7%
👍
45
40.9%
🤝
7
6.36%
🔥
4
3.64%
🏆
3
2.73%
👏
2
1.82%
😭
2
1.82%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2024 to 11 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @power_crypto_coin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 October 2024 to 11 December 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ربات SaveQuestion تا این لحظه تمام آلارم های یک کلاهبرداری رو داره باید صبر کنیم ببینیم جلوتر چی میشه
هیچ پرداختی توش انجام ندادم / نمیدم فعلا
بازی رو پیگیر هم نیستم چون علاوه بر اون نشونه هایی که داره , به خاطر اینکه میگه اگر هر روز نیای و تسک هارو انجام ندی از امتیازت کم میکنم
ادامه دادن یا ندادنش به خودتون مربوط هستش
✅ @power_crypto_coin
#SaveQuestion
💥پروژه Save Question یکی دیگه از پروژه های سازنده میجر ⭐️
⚡️این پروژه قراره 24 روز دیگه لیست بشه و قیمت احتمالیش رو داخل خود ربات (از نظر هوش مصنوعی پروژه و رای کاربران) 0.64 دلار زده 💵
که البته تضمینی نیست
⚡️وقتی ربات رو استارت کنید یه تعداد امتیاز بهتون میده و بعد از اون میتونید با انجام دادن تسک ها امتیازتون رو بیشتر کنید
⚠️ توجه مهم : این پروژه هم مثل همهی پروژه های اقای راکسمن بخشهای پولی زیا…
هیچ چیز معتبری از این پروژه پیدا نکردم ، اسمش معتبره و در اصل قراره یه میکروسیستم برای شبکه سولانا باشه اما در مورد این سایت و ادعاهای منبعی بر فورک بودن از سولانا و چیزی که توی سایتش نوشته هیچ چیزی معتبری پیدا نمیشه ، از اونجایی که صرفا هممون یک کیف پول خالی وصل کردیم اسکم بودن یا نبودنش تاثیری روی ما نداره و صرفا این چند روز رو هم صبر میکنیم ببینیم وضعیتش چی میشه
✅ @power_crypto_coin
#Airdrop
📌شبکه سولانا داره یه ارز جدید میده که شما میتونید با دادن آدرس کیف پولتون توش شرکت کنید و منتظر دریافت و لیست شدنش باشید ، فعلا فقط 6 ساعت برای گرفتنش فرصت داریم پس بریم روند رو انجام بدیم تا بعدا توضحیات تکمیلی رو میدم
اول نیازه یه کیف پول نصب کنید که سلونا رو پشتبانی کنه من فانتوم رو نصب کردم (برای این کار ولت جدید بسازید مشکلیپیش نیاد)
لینک دانلود از گوگلپلی : https://play.google.com/store/apps/detai…
#major ⭐️
📣خریدار میجر شما با بهترین قیمت و تسویه انی
❗️با توجه به بازار، قیمت ها تغییر میکند
🔴 هر ده عدد میجر شما را 650,000 خریداریم
جهت خرید و فروش و اطلاع از قیمت به ایدیهای زیر پیام دهید
🔹 @saeedhoseini_56
🔹 @artin_np
✅️ @power_crypto_coin
#Memefi ❤️
⭕️چند نکته باید که باید توجه کنید ⭕️
⚡️برای برداشت توکنها به کیف پول های انطباقی با شبکه SUI یا کیف پولهای چند زنجیرهای مانند OKX نیاز دارید.
⚡️کیف پول تونکیپر قابلیت برداشت این توکن را نداره چون تونکیپر فقط برای توکن های زیرشبکه TON استفاده میشه
⚡️ برای دریافت ایردراپ MEMEFI$، حتماً باید کیف پول OKX خود را به اکانت تلگرام خود وصل کنید(در ویدیوی بالا گفته شده)چون این کار شرط واجد شرایط بودن شما در…
#Memefi ❤️
💥آموزش اتصال OKX Wallet به ربات memefi
⚠️این کارهارو حتما انجام بدید وگرنه تو برداشت ایردراپ به مشکل میخورید / فعلا هم نیاز نیست sui بفرستید صبر کنید تا اسنپ شات انجام بشه
✅ @power_crypto_coin
#Memefi ❤️
💥 اسنپشات میمفای Memefi فردا 16 آبان ساعت 15:30 انجام میشه.
⚡️ اسنپشات روز 16 آبان ساعت 15:30
⚡️ مشخص شدن تعداد توکن کاربران 18 آبان
⚡️ لیستینگ توکن MEMEFI$ روز 22 آبان
📣 میمفای اعلام کرده است که 85 درصد از کل توکن ها برای کاربر ها در نظر گرفته شده است
✅ @power_crypto_coin
#W-Coin⛹️
💥 امشب، ساعت 23:30 به وقت تهران
⚡️اسنپ شات (جمع آوری داده های کاربران) جهت تعیین سهم آن ها به منظور توزیع توکن ها برای ایردراپ، امشب ساعت 23:30 به وقت تهران انجام خواهد گرفت.
ورود به ربات W-Coin
✅ @power_crypto_coin
#Memefi
💥 تاریخ لیست MemeFi مشخص شد !
⚡️ اسنپشات 16 آبان ساعت 15:30 گرفته میشه و اطلاعات همهی کاربران ثبت میشه، 22 آبان توکن پروژه لیست و ایردراپ بین کاربرا پخش میشه.
🔴آموزشهای لازم برای برداشت رو بعد از مشخص شدن روش برداشت براتون میذارم.
✅ @power_crypto_coin
#Blum
💥قابلیت استخراج داگز در بلوم امروز ساعت 12:30 برای 7.6 میلیون کاربر فعال خواهد شد و عرضه کامل 24 ساعت طول میکشه
⚡️برای واجد شرایط بودن
➖یک کیف پول TON فعال با حداقل 1 تراکنش خروجی به Blum متصل داشته باشید
➖کیف پول شما باید قبل از 21 اکتبر، ساعت 11:30 فعال شود
➖ شرکت کنندگان DOGS Rain (مرحله آزمون) این بار واجد شرایط نیستند
🔴کسایی که قبلا براشون فعال شده بود دیگه واجد شرایط نیستند
✅ @power_crypto_coin
👍6🏆3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @power_crypto_coin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,616,706 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Coin” (@power_crypto_coin), 1,087 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/power_crypto_coin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.