Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for تحلیل داده | پوریا بغدادی

Channel

تحلیل داده | پوریا بغدادی

@pouriyabaghdadi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,019subscribers

+52 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001005716499
TypeChannel
Username@pouriyabaghdadi
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pouriyabaghdadi

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,9669,0198,992.55 August 2026 — 8,967 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,967 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,966 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,983 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,981 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,987 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,982 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,991 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,996 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,001 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,006 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,007 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,013 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,019 subscribers5 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net +52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,958–9,027 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:009,019+6
14 Sept 2026, 00:419,013+6
10 Sept 2026, 10:149,007+1
1 Sept 2026, 11:259,006+5
29 Aug 2026, 06:359,001+5
26 Aug 2026, 01:458,996+5
22 Aug 2026, 18:258,991+9
19 Aug 2026, 08:038,982-5
16 Aug 2026, 03:278,987+6
12 Aug 2026, 18:038,981-2
10 Aug 2026, 03:318,983+17
6 Aug 2026, 20:558,966-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:528,967no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:048,967first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 9,019 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held31 (12 July 202626 August 2026)
Views total4,212
Reactions total110
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 15s
Average length
7m 08s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

880 reactions across 31 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
52759.9%
👍28432.3%
👎505.68%
😱192.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 880 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC845 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

در نسخه می ۲۰۲۶، فارسی‌سازی فونت در کارت‌های جدید Power BI فارسی به نظر غیرممکن می‌رسد. برای رفع این مشکل، از فایل پیوست‌شده استفاده کنید و بخش $id را بررسی نمایید. با احترام 🫶🏼

9👍3😱1

26 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC927 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

کاتالوگ دوره آموزشی Power BI منطبق با ورژن 2026 ‌ لینک اطلاعات کامل دوره: https://tahlilgary.com/2 ‌

10👍3👎1

25 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈1,120 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

نحوه معرفی کردن افراد به شرکت‌ها... https://tahlilgary.com/powerbi-portfolio/ ‌

9👍7

25 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC≈1,320 views67 reactionsread 28 August 2026

راه‎های ارتباطی شغلی خودتون را قطع نکنید من توی شهرهای مختلف افرادی می شناسم وقتی می خوام بابت Power BI به کارفرما معرفی کنم می بینم فردی که مد نظرم هست 2 روزه پیام من را در تلگرام چک نکرده! توی بله هم نیست تماس هم پاسخ نمی ده این موضوع رایج هست، مال یک بار و دو بار نیست! شاید هم اعتماد به نفس ندارن و میترسن! نمی دونم...

👍4518😱3👎1

19 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈2,080 views35 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🏷 https://www.linkedin.com/in/hossein-taeb-b94b8351/ در این سال ها من از آقای طائب خیلی آموختم و امروز افتخار دارم اعلام کنم که بابت داوری اولین مسابقه تحلیل داده ایران از حضور ایشان بهره مند می‌شویم. بیشتر خواهم گفت... ارادت 🫶🏼

28👍6👎1

18 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC≈2,350 views48 reactionsread 28 August 2026

به نظر من، شرکت‌هایی که نرم‌افزارهای سازمانی در حوزه‌هایی مانند حسابداری، منابع انسانی، فروش، CRM، ERP و سایر زمینه‌ها ارائه می‌کنند، می‌توانند با در اختیار گذاشتن یک دیتابیس یا بکاپ نمونه از نرم‌افزار خود و برگزاری یک مسابقه کشوری طراحی داشبورد با Power BI، چند هدف مهم را هم‌زمان محقق کنند: از یک طرف استعدادهای برتر حوزه تحلیل داده و هوش تجاری را شناسایی و حتی برای همکاری جذب کنند؛ از طرف دیگر، قابلیت‌ها و داده‌های

28👍17👎3

16 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈2,490 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

21👍5👎1

16 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC≈2,420 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026

در مورد مسابقه تحلیل داده توضیح صوتی تقدیم خواهد شد...

16👎1

16 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC≈2,540 views26 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

اولین مسابقه تحلیل داده ایران لینک اطلاعات بیشتر و دریافت فایل‌ها ارتباط با من کانال تحلیلگری وب سایت ‌‌

17👍8👎1

15 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC≈2,470 views65 reactionsread 28 August 2026

سلام. درود. به زودی مسابقه داریم. 🫶🏼 تحلیل داده. خروجی با کمک AI. فرمت HTML. تحلیل‌ها مهم است. امتیاز طراحی 20%. امتیاز تحلیل 80%. عشقید...

55👍9👎1

11 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC≈3,060 views42 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

در مورد تفاوت های XLOOKUP و VLOOKUP یک ویدئو منتشر کنم؟

  1. بله ✅90%
  2. خیر، بلدم ❌10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍2118👎2😱1

11 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC≈3,050 views34 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

27👍6👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @pouriyabaghdadi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTCFinal Results298 voters

در مورد تفاوت های XLOOKUP و VLOOKUP یک ویدئو منتشر کنم؟

  1. بله ✅90%
  2. خیر، بلدم ❌10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTCFinal Results280 voters

کدام مسابقه برای شما اولویت دارد؟

  1. مسابقه Power BI50%
  2. مسابقه تحلیل داده با AI50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Jul 2026, 19:33 UTCAnonymous Poll587 voters

به عنوان متخصص اکسل یا پاور بی‌آی با کدام هوش مصنوعی آشنایی ندارید؟

  1. Claude80%
  2. Chatgpt20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Power BI | تحلیل داده | SQL
@PowerBI_ir · 21,709
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
آموزش اکسل | Ms Excel
@VBA_Excel · 101,861
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
حرفه ای شو اکسل | Power BI
@herfeish0 · 46,375
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
آموزش کامپیوتر | سمانه سلاجقه
@icdlclass2023 · 43,048
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
مهارت های اکسل
@excel_skills · 37,325
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
🟡 حسابداری دات کام
@hesabdarycom · 23,999
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
جاب‌ویژن | Jobvision | استخدام | کاریابی
@jobvision · 59,285
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تحلیل داده | پوریا بغدادی” (@pouriyabaghdadi), 9,019 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pouriyabaghdadi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.