Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

По сучеству

@posuchestvu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001718433113
TypeChannel
Username@posuchestvu
DescriptionЕсли ты говоришь с Богом - это молитва, а если он с тобой, то это шизофрения. Но, простите, с кем мне обсуждать прочитанное в сети?
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/posuchestvu

Growth

87 August 2026 — 8 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:328no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:188first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 26 October 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
336
Videos
89
Links
90

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬240.0%
💩120.0%
💯120.0%
🤣120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2023 to 7 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Dec 2023, 16:42 UTC142 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А мы считаем, что хоть в жопу там все переебитесь уже. Задолбали, клянусь! https://t.me/BlackSeaStrategyInstitute/19594

💯1

4 Dec 2023, 17:41 UTC145 viewsread 12 August 2026

Почему мужчины живут меньше женщин? В этом видео ужасно все: дурь молодецкая, высота и то, что мальчик одет не по погоде. https://t.me/kgavrilovnanews/68053

14 Nov 2023, 10:41 UTC160 viewsread 12 August 2026

Тут не могу определиться: ни то "зовите санитаров", ни то "снимаю шляпу". Что за адские глазища Саурона? Чисто день города с салютом в Мордоре. Но нет, это талисман "Игр будущего" https://t.me/tass_agency/218615

9 Nov 2023, 13:09 UTC159 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Яндекс ходит по тонкому льду

9 Nov 2023, 13:09 UTC141 viewsread 12 August 2026

Только попробуйте, сволочи, я сожгу вашу Алису в куче рекламного мусора, что до сих пор щедро суют в почтовый ящик. У вас и так, что не решишь включить так "правообладатель блаблабла запретил, недоступно". Фак ю, Яндекс 👊

8 Nov 2023, 20:02 UTC110 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Денискины рассказы значит... Итак 2023 год, выясняется, что одни друзья несколько лет от души наебывали пару других друзей на много миллионов рублей. И не только их 😜 Пугали ФСБ, носили сами в Большой дом взятки, сбегали на частном джете из Петербурга, жили одной комунной в Армении, ой, где их только не носило... Товарищ Адамович, продавайте права на экранизацию, отобъете долги и, может быть, вполне может, хватит н

🤣1

8 Nov 2023, 07:56 UTC83 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Вы, наверное, не в курсе, но я работаю на Собчак, монтаж там, то-сё, в общем-то Собчак тоже не в курсе, что у нее есть такая творческая рабочая единица. Кароч, вью с Моргеном унылое и зрелище печальное, спасибо флэшбэкам, благодаря им было смешно. Господи, Алишер, ну как под копирку, ну! Банька, блять, русское радио🤣

7 Nov 2023, 19:51 UTC70 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Блин, ну вдруг вы весь день держались, а теперь хотите услышать как Моргенштерн у Собчак склоняет "хуй" по падежам и сильно боится вернутся домой. Даня Милохин, у нас оказывается нежный ребёночек, дебилёнку 22 года если чо. Ну, в общем, Собчак пацана дострелила, контрольным. Зато 8!!! рекламных интеграцией всунула, 9ая контекстная. Поюзала лысого. https://t.me/bloodysx/31737

🤬2

7 Nov 2023, 15:40 UTC58 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как я смотрю ленту в социалках: Кент на фоне городского пейзажа (набережная, гаражный массив людная улица) - бля, фотка в стиле "сфоткай, чтоб все видели, что я на выходных дома не сижу". О, подпись есть даже, "прекрасные выходные". А по твоей и роже не скажешь. И костюм этот, блядский, твой спортивный, один на всю жизнь, и в пир и в мир. Ставлю лайк, листаю дальше. Дальше шапошная знакомка, красивая девка в платье,

7 Nov 2023, 07:31 UTC53 viewsread 12 August 2026

Ой, товарищ Рамзан так тонко в юмор пошел, а я уж волноваться начала, что растет маленький Брежнев, что любил себя самого представлять к различным наградам. https://t.me/lastoppo/3255

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @posuchestvu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“По сучеству” (@posuchestvu), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/posuchestvu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.