Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Постіронічний метамодерн

Channel

Постіронічний метамодерн

@postironichniymetamodern

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,450subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001450572707
TypeChannel
Username@postironichniymetamodern
Created17 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/postironichniymetamodern

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,4444,4824,4636 August 2026 — 4,481 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,481 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,482 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,475 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,474 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,471 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,470 subscribers22 August 2026 — 4,469 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,471 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,466 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,461 subscribers5 September 2026 — 4,455 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,444 subscribers13 September 2026 — 4,452 subscribers17 September 2026 — 4,450 subscribers4,4506 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,438–4,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 15:384,450-2
13 Sept 2026, 21:204,452+8
9 Sept 2026, 21:584,444-11
5 Sept 2026, 00:414,455-6
1 Sept 2026, 02:044,461-5
28 Aug 2026, 16:364,466-5
25 Aug 2026, 09:364,471+2
22 Aug 2026, 04:354,469-1
19 Aug 2026, 06:144,470-1
15 Aug 2026, 19:294,471-3
12 Aug 2026, 02:524,474-1
9 Aug 2026, 12:024,475-7
6 Aug 2026, 14:064,482+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:354,481no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:464,481first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

420 reactions across 28 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁18343.6%
🤣6214.8%
🔥378.81%
😭266.19%
🥰245.71%
❤215.00%
💯215.00%
👍122.86%
🫡92.14%
😢71.67%
🤮61.43%
🤯40.952%
🗿30.714%
🌚20.476%
🤔20.476%
👎10.238%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 420 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC222 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍8😭2

Signed Edward Ronald

8 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC381 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁13

Signed Edward Ronald

7 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC424 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁8

Signed Edward Ronald

7 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC496 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁14❤2

Signed Edward Ronald

7 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC497 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤9😁4

Signed Edward Ronald

7 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC531 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣14🤔2🤮1😭1

Signed Edward Ronald

6 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC620 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣10😢6🤮4🌚2🔥2👎1

Signed Edward Ronald

6 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈3,420 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁17🤯4

Signed Edward Ronald

5 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC421 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @iuwiusometimePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣8😁4❤1🫡1

Signed Edward Ronald

4 Aug 2026, 22:59 UTC651 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣10😁7❤1

Signed Edward Ronald

4 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC604 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁15

Signed Edward Ronald

4 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTC565 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @plitu_indesitVideo

Video, posted without a caption

😁4

Signed Edward Ronald

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @postironichniymetamodern. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Постіронічний метамодерн” (@postironichniymetamodern), 4,450 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/postironichniymetamodern.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.