心情有点烦躁,实验不会写,高数也没复习。脑子里一团乱麻,不知道自己想干什么,现在还瘫在图书馆里。 明明心里很慌,实验要ddl,复习才刚开始,但是就是不想动,什么都不想做,很想回宿舍去摸鱼,好抓狂…… 我在想是不是最近太累了,每天早上很早就醒,学一天之后,晚上还坚持跑步。虽然说很规律,但是睡觉的时间有点少了,要知道之前每天都是睡10个小时的,现在每天睡觉时间还不到7个小时,一定是睡得不好的原因,导致我现在心情极差。 emmm,一定是这样
Channel
二哈的考研日常2020
@postgraduate_husky
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001200783024 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @postgraduate_husky |
| Description | 在这里记录一下我的考研生活 |
| Created | 22 May 2019 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/postgraduate_husky |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 8 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 8 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 22 May 2019 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2019. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
看到一则有趣的推文: "We made computers 100 times faster and made the web 200 times slower." 不难理解,虽然我们在极力发现硬件,但是现在软件越做越大,越来越臃肿,其中一个原因是,很多软件本来挺优秀的,结果不知道在哪看到了某某某领域的火热,于是就“理所当然”的去分一杯羹,然后就美其名曰“重大更新,提升用户体验”。虽然说把功能集中到一起不失为一种解决软件冗杂的方法,但是,怎么说呢,不是所有人都是需要这个需求的(我就想聊个天,你和我整个这秀那秀的有啥子用处),所以,我觉得还是老老实实做好自己本来的一行就好了。另一个原因就是:为了提升用户体验。然后就变成了现在这个局面,很多app都是无所不用其极,从启动画面,到点击特效……只要你能想到的,它们几乎都做到了。但是这背后却隐藏着一个问题:你的设备得足够强(贵), 让你得到最佳体验。 至于为什么现在大多数人能得到不错的体验…
今天读了一篇英文文章,里面提到了一个名词"self-distance",意思是说,和自己保持距离,这样可以让你不被情绪所左右。举个例子就是,当问自己为什么的时候不问“我为什么这么做?”而是问“你为什么这么做?”;作者说这样可以让你在一些比较不理智的情况做出更为理智的决定(虽然我觉得有点难,但是有研究报告已经得出这个结论了🤪)。但是,我觉得这个还是有可取之处的,毕竟可以让我们从一个不同的角度看待同一个问题。
🤪🤪🤪到现在还没开始复习 这实验代码写的我头疼,感觉不是很难,但就是不太懂老师给的提示是什么意思😤
虽然昨天下雨了,但是我还是去跑步了,恩,很好 虽然今天也下雨了,但是我还是很早就来图书馆了,恩,也很好🤪
这学期第一次出门这么早,还是周末🤓 新的一天 Morning!
不过还好keep打卡没废
由于各种不可抗力,今天学的有点少…
笔记本突然没办法翻墙了,好奇怪啊,感觉什么配置都和我的台式一样的,但台式还好好的,手机也可以…找了好久都没找到,无奈只能还原系统了😤 心累
图书馆外面一阵热风一阵冷风的,吹得人好不舒服
买的小米手环到了,但是……我发现没办法连keep😭
研究发现养狗与基因变异相关 根据发表在《Scientific Reports》期刊上的一项研究,瑞典和英国科学家利用 “瑞典双胞胎登记” 提供的 35035 对双胞胎的遗传信息研究了 “养狗的继承性” 问题。他们发现,遗传变异可以解释超过一半的养狗习惯变化,意味着,你领养一只狗的选择很大程度上受到了你个人的基因组成的影响。研究双胞胎可以揭示环境和基因对我们生物学和行为的影响。因为同卵双胞胎共享整个基因组,而非同卵双胞胎平均只共享一半的遗传变异,所以比较两组之间 “是否有狗” 的对内一致性可以发现遗传是否在养狗中起到作用。研究人员发现,同卵双胞胎中养狗的一致性要比不同卵双胞胎大得多,这支持了一种观点,即遗传确实在养狗的选择中起着重要作用。Media https://www.solidot.org/story?sid=60684
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @postgraduate_husky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“二哈的考研日常2020” (@postgraduate_husky), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/postgraduate_husky.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.