Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Aigar | PostCryptom

@postcryptom

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,898subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001692449999
TypeChannel
Username@postcryptom
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/postcryptom

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,8985,9175,907.57 August 2026 — 5,917 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,914 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,904 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,898 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,895–5,920 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:465,898-6
10 Aug 2026, 15:285,904-10
7 Aug 2026, 22:355,914-3
7 Aug 2026, 06:175,917first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 10s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

801 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡53266.4%
👍9812.2%
🔥9211.5%
364.49%
😁253.12%
😱121.50%
🎉20.25%
😢20.25%
🎄10.125%
🤯10.125%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 801reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @postcryptom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 February 2026 to 12 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC368 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Получил первую выплату ✌🏻 Всего 100 баксов, но приятно, что без нервов и рисом на собственный капитал. Взял себе челлендж на 10 000$ Чтожж поехали! Если хочешь затестить то можешь сделать это по ссылке: https://hashhedge.com/?fpr=aigar По промокоду AIGAR — 10% скидка на первую покупку.

👍4🔥31🤡1

16 Jun 2026, 13:44 UTC745 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Спросить когда $ETH по 5000? 👀

3🔥2😱2

12 Jun 2026, 13:12 UTC602 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Майкл Сейлор. Оправдывается почему продал 32 биткойна.

🔥3😱3😁2

12 Jun 2026, 12:14 UTC501 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня я в Праге 🇨🇿 На конференции BTC Prague Средний возраст на конференции по ощущениям 40+ я бы даже сказал 50+ Видно что взрослые дяди и тети любят «деда» в крипте а все вот это новое им не нужно)) Через час выступает Майкл Сейлор и через 2 часа я еду в аэропорт и лечу в Берлин на следующую конференцию ✌🏻 Хороших выходных и дайте знать интересно вам вообще чем я занимаюсь и куда пропал 🥹 простите что мало д

🔥3😱31👍1😢1

3 Jun 2026, 08:25 UTC811 views17 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я прошёл челлендж на HashHedge 🔥 На это у меня ушло почти 6 месяцев, но если считать именно торговые дни — их было всего 46. Да, кто-то может сказать: «долго». Но для меня главное другое: я прошёл пропку сам, с первого раза, не слил депозит и дошёл до результата спокойно. И я реально этому безумно рад. Что теперь? Я получил $5,000 в управление, потратив на челлендж всего $79. Теперь я буду торговать на этом акк

🔥112😁2🎄1🎉1

11 May 2026, 15:36 UTC≈1,180 views550 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Почему старые Move-to-Earn / GameFi проекты уже не воскреснут Хочу разобрать один показательный проект из прошлого. Без названий. Потому что здесь важнее сама механика смерти. Был хайп. Были NFT. Был внутриигровой токен. Было комьюнити. Было “ходи / играй / зарабатывай”. Была вера, что проект станет большим. Но сейчас, если смотреть объективно, такой проект уже мёртв. И нет, проект мёртв не потому, что токен упал

🤡516🔥20👍64😁2🎉1😱1

8 May 2026, 20:02 UTC≈1,090 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

До конца недели будет пост. Рабочая неделя была не простой. Может как то поделюсь кем и где работаю 😁 но кому интересно итак найдет.

👍4🔥1🤡1😁1

22 Apr 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,790 views72 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

#мысливслух Наткнулся я тут на мысли одного человека, кто купил миллионы бесполезных токенов кое какого НФТ ГЕЙМИФАЙ проекта ( к моменту написания поста по словам человека у него 15 млн токенов) и он слепо верит, что однажды это сделает его супер богатым человеком и вообще нужно подержать и потерпеть. В целом, многие поняли о каком проекте речь и о каком человеке)) Ну в целом если вам интерсно, то дайте реакций хо

👍43🔥20😁9

16 Apr 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,350 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#инфоцыган Просто торгую, сам аккуратно, может быть когда нибудь начну делиться своими сделками, но пока я не готов к этому 🥲 Торгую все так же на HashHedge ✌🏻 🚀 Telegram | 💬Чат| 💬 Twitter | 📹 YouTube

3😁3👍2🔥2🤡2

14 Apr 2026, 06:05 UTC≈1,210 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

К сожалению тут словил стоп, но ничего стоп - часть игры 😁 благо торгую соблюдая РМ

🤡5👍1

13 Apr 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,670 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ДРОП ОТ JUPITER! 💲 Прошел еще один квартал голосований и участия в DAO и пришло время забирать награду! Бежим и забираем: https://jup.ag/rewards/asr-2026-q1 Чтобы забрать дроп нужен кошелек Jupiter, скачать можно ТУТ Забрать дроп можно до 8 июля 2026 года. Стоит ли покупать $JUP писали ТУТ Как стейкать $JUP описывали ТУТ 🚀 Telegram | 💬Чат| 💬 Twitter | 📹 YouTube

🔥3👍21

13 Apr 2026, 15:14 UTC552 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Закрыл прошлый Шорт и зашел в новый 🤣✌🏻 Закрыл шорт на отметке 70700 и по лимитке на 71150 зашел в новый шортец. Торгую все так же на HashHedge ✌🏻 🚀 Telegram | 💬Чат| 💬 Twitter | 📹 YouTube

👍32🔥2🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @postcryptom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 285,247 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aigar | PostCryptom” (@postcryptom), 5,898 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/postcryptom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.