Channel
@post101drop
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,015subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001718521708 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @post101drop |
| Created | 27 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/post101drop |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 3,015 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 3,018 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 3,020 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 3,020 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
463 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 119 | 25.7% | |
| 💯 | 111 | 24.0% | |
| 👍 | 89 | 19.2% | |
| 👏 | 76 | 16.4% | |
| 🤔 | 25 | 5.40% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 4.97% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 1.73% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 0.648% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 0.648% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.432% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.432% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.216% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.216% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 463reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2025 to 26 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Some food for thought: Does anyone feel like at some point AI will get strong enough that they will create AI military bots to basically keep law and order like they do in those dystopian novels do u? I mean they’re not people so they lack any empathy and they learn from people so they continuously evolve. And do you think us creating these data plants and investing into these AI platforms is basically just us sett…
💯11🤔3❤1
👀
👍17🤔2🔥1
Happy New Year! 🥳 USA’s 250th birthday is going to be a great year, no better president to have during this time. 🇺🇸
❤36
Most relevant post I’ve seen so far. A true hero and legend. RIP.
💯27❤5
BREAKING: Texas Governor Abbott signs new law declaring gold and silver as legal tender for everyday financial transactions. @GeneralMCNews
👏13❤10
Elon and Trump = OPTICS. Everyone criticized Trump for bringing Elon into the office and having too much power for not being a politician - so they needed to have a “falling out.” Optics are very important 😎
👍17💯9🤔3
(Yesterday) lol
💯7❤2👍2
🪙❤️👇🏻
BREAKING: Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has signed a bill into law making gold and silver legal tender for transactions in the state. @GeneralMCNews
👏24❤3👍3
Anyone in healthcare knows prostate cancer is screened for yearly and is typically slow growing. Having prostate CA Mets to bones would have had to be undetected for a while. Shouldn’t they be watching a (former) president’s health more closely? What other large political figures like a President has passed away from cancer before? 🤔
👍10💯4❤1
"The United States Government will never default. We will raise the debt ceiling." @ShadowofEzra
👍5❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
👏2🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @post101drop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Qdrops_post101_group” (@post101drop), 3,015 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/post101drop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.