Channel
@poslushala
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
49subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002249836385 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @poslushala |
| Description | Заметки о книжечках, которые я слушаю, и других историях Банк приколов @begitoret |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 November 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/poslushala |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 49 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:50 | 49 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 22 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (22 April 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 74 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
46 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 54.3% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 13.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 10.9% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Брала с собой на сплав Чёрные кувшинки Мишеля Бюсси. Вообще я расчитывала на второй подход к Саспыге, которая усыпляла меня в прошлом году в поезде и я отложила. Или хотя бы Шурале. Но в моей библиотеке, на бумаге, их не было, а Кувшинки были. Хотя я планировала атмосферно обсираться и бояться выйти в туалет из палатки… Крч, я вообще не выкупаю восторгов по поводу Кувшинок. Товарищ Мишель буквально меня обманул с п…
🤝3❤1👌1🔥1
Смотрю сейчас Бухту вдов: обсираюсь и крякаю. Вычитала, что сценаристка Бухты Кэти Дипполд написала так же Парки и зоны отдыха, а я их обожаю. Поэтому хоть и хоррор, но я превозмогаю — ну смешно же. Я обычно, когда смотрю что-то с потенциальными скриммерами, стараюсь сначала прочитать содержание серии, чтоб как-то морально себя подготовить. Но сейчас смотрю под завтрак и быстрый гуглинг не дал желаемых результатов.…
❤4
🔊🔊🔊
💯1🔥1
Я должна признаться — мне понравилось. Хотя, может, лет 5 назад я просто по приколу решила посмотреть первый фильм. И это закончилось мыслью «ну и хрень». И вот мы здесь: спустя 15 лет, благодаря книжным клубам сомнительной литературы, я открыла для себя Сумерки. Теперь я заканчиваю слушать вторую книгу и начала смотреть третий фильм. Несмотря на гирлянды редфлагов от обеих «команд», меня удивительно комфортит эта…
❤2
Посмотрела ГКС. Сент-Луис После просмотра появилась слабая надежда, что мужчины — нормальные люди и у них есть чувства. Ужасно жалко всех героев в этой очень человечной истории. Я даже к бумеру-следователю прониклась, ведь и у этого персонажа случилась какая-никакая арка. Может показаться, что не хватает динамики. Но думаю, что так даже лучше. Сериал надо смотреть вдумчиво, а не фоном. Мне понравилось, что это кор…
❤4
Решила полистать Шум Рои Хен. Такое мы слушаем. #держувкурсе
❤5😁2
Тут и там слышу хорошее про Препараторов. К третьей главе сердечко уже разочек сжалось, но книга пока не затянула по уши… #держувкурсе
Я продолжаю участвовать в причинении добра! Давайте со мной!
Благотворительный книжный клуб по роману Стефани Майер «Сумерки» к 125-летию Эдварда Каллена. Хоахоахоахоахоа… всем подпевающим целую мысли, остальным поясню. Сумерки, как книга, так и фильм - культурный феномен, который не просто потряс мир, но и стал неотъемлемой частью его повседневности. Историю о вампирах либо любят, либо ненавидят; с презрением насмехаются над чувствами «волка, влюбившегося в овечку», либо до …
Я тут в рамках гигиены сна (ничего не получается, но я не унываю) шуршу по библиотекам всякое. Я умираю с этих маркировок. Сразу видно — книга стоящая.
Провели финальный созвон благотворительного книжного клуба, где мы читали не побоюсь этих слов «Шепот глубин» Эммы Хэмм Собрали рекордную в истории клуба сумму, которая уже ушла в фонд помощи животным, пострадавшим от разлива мазута в Чёрном море Жемчужная 🙏 Разложили лютый кринж во кринже на аллюзии к Шекспиру, Руссо, Золушке и Красавице и чудовищу Горжусь нами, Таня и Лада❤️ Выдыхаем)
❤4
В хорошей компании даже самые сомнительные книги лечат сердца. Если мне когда-нибудь предложат повторить опыт совместных кринж-чтений, я непременно повторю!
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @poslushala. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Основано на нереальных событиях” (@poslushala), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poslushala.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.