Пишем об управлении цветочным бизнесом, увеличиваем продажи, даем контроль над всеми показателями
Сайт posiflora.com
Youtube https://clck.ru/FXz87
MAX: https://max.ru/posiflora
Регистрация в РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/690daed7fa96105ef0b81b41
#AMC2
Created
Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
8 measurements spanning 8 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,062–13,099 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 12:07
13,095
+20
13 Aug 2026, 02:33
13,075
+3
12 Aug 2026, 01:16
13,072
+6
10 Aug 2026, 04:35
13,066
-13
9 Aug 2026, 03:54
13,079
-10
8 Aug 2026, 03:37
13,089
+19
7 Aug 2026, 03:40
13,070
no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:31
13,070
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.24%
avg views ÷ 13,095 subscribers
Avg views / post
948
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 37 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
39 (2 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
36,963
Reactions total
897
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,250
Videos
≈1,280
Links
≈2,750
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 07s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
897 reactions across 37 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
301
33.6%
🔥
231
25.8%
😁
120
13.4%
custom 5375196487712009242
110
12.3%
custom 5316703431186997675
56
6.24%
💔
44
4.91%
custom 5395507233435974619
35
3.90%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 897reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Почему вы отправили мой букет не на тот адрес? Возвращайте деньги!
Такое сообщение пришло флористу из видео 👆🏻
Клиент указал в заказе квартиру 31 вместо 21. Флорист отправил букет по указанному адресу и даже прислал фото готового заказа перед доставкой.
Когда выяснилось, что букет получила не та квартира, клиент спросил: почему вы сами не уточнили адрес перед доставкой? 🥲
Кто прав, кто виноват? А главное — что де…
Вместе с ROSENWAY провели большой эфир по «Честному знаку» для цветочного бизнеса 🌷
К эфиру ребята подготовили подробную рабочую тетрадь, о которой вы часто спрашивали, практически пошаговое руководство: какие дополнительные товары цветочного магазина попадают под маркировку, в каких случаях товар может законно не попадать под требования, в том числе разобран кейс с ремесленниками.
Удобный материал, который можно с…
Мишки с «Садовода»: что с ними делать до 1 сентября? 🧸
Это был, пожалуй, самый частый вопрос на нашем эфире:
Игрушки годами покупали на Садоводе. Накладных нет, сертификатов нет, поставщика уже не найти. Что теперь — выбрасывать всё?
Сразу важное: место покупки само по себе ничего не меняет. Для «Честного знака» важно, относится ли товар к остаткам, которые находились в обороте на 1 декабря 2025 года и были произв…
Всё, про «Честный знак» на сегодня хватит 😅 Теперь открывайте галерею
Если день был такой, что вы успели собрать десяток букетов, ответить всем клиентам и только сейчас добрались до телефона — есть шанс, что где-то среди сегодняшних фото затесался букет с георгинами 📸
Не оставляйте его просто в фотоплёнке. Он может принести вам 15 000 ₽ 💸
У нас продолжается конкурс вместе с Lacy Bird Academy, и призовых мест целых…
«Я все игрушки уже отдала в приют, не хочу ничего маркировать» 🧸
На форуме флористов обсуждают «Честный знак», и мнения разделились. Кто-то уже промаркировал остатки, кто-то только пытается понять, с чего начинать, а один цветочный вообще посчитал продажи игрушек за несколько лет и решил отказаться от категории: остатки отдали, а освободившееся место заняли более продаваемыми товарами
✅ И это, кстати, один из вариа…
15 тысяч за букет — дорого? 👇🏻
А мы как раз готовы столько заплатить за фото лучшего летнего букета с георгинами 🌸
И не только 15 тысяч, в конкурсе 12 призовых мест: деньги, сертификаты в «Золотое Яблоко» и Ozon, Telegram Premium.
До 24 августа ещё можно успеть: соберите свой букет и пришлите его в комментарии к этому посту 👈🏻
Сносят Рижский цветочный рынок? Москва уже успела попрощаться 💔
Появились кадры демонтажных работ, одна из самых известных цветочных точек Москвы действительно уходит в историю. Здание цветочного рынка у «Рижской» начали сносить ради строительства крупного транспортного узла.
⏰ Но буквально 50 минут назад Администрация Рижского цветочного рынка сообщила РИА Новости, что сам рынок никто не сносит и он продолжает раб…
Кто здесь из Санкт-Петербурга? 👋
Уже 13 и 14 августа проводим 2 живые встречи для владельцев цветочного бизнеса и флористов. Выбирайте свою тему — или приходите на обе!
🌿 13 августа в 14:00
«Российский цветок: бизнес или патриотизм?»
Елена Попова расскажет:
— может ли российский цветок конкурировать с импортным;
— выгодно ли работать с фермерами;
— как продавать сезонные цветы дороже.
🎁 Мастер-класс по сборке букет…
Схлопнется эта контора без меня!
А у вас были такие сотрудники?
❤️ — Да
🔥 — Нет
😁 — Я и есть такой сотрудник
😁16❤11🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @posiflora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@posiflora edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 261,098 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌸POSiFLORA: всё для цветочного бизнеса” (@posiflora), 13,095 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/posiflora.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
