Channel
@port7777_scam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
13subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001794305048 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @port7777_scam |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 19 August 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/port7777_scam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 13 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 14 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 14 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 19 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
34 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 20 | 58.8% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 29.4% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2022 to 12 June 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
киевская принцесса @port7777 глядя на свой полупустой гардероб расстроилась и чуть не упала в глубокое разочарование от бытия "я достойна лучшего" - подумала принцесса про себя и решилась действовать судьба была благосклонна к ней и тут же час объявился принц по кличке "вещевик" на белом пейпале - который обладал способностью взмахом палки ставить хорошие ордера чух-чух 🪄 и ордер на платье Дживанши за 1.200$ был п…
😁6👍1
❌❌❌ #ПРЕТЕНЗИЯ ❌❌❌ Претензия к владельцу PORT LOYAL @port7777 и его саппорту @portvccsupport Работал долгое время с командой Порта, делали работу вовремя и качественно, всегда справлялись с объёмом. После месячного перерыва решил вернуться к работе по ба, обратился к сапу, скинул фулку, чтобы регнули чайм, спустя ~ 1ч получаю данные от чайма и спустя сутки линкую ба с конфига Ovpn под штат и решаюсь сделать депозит…
👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
😁4
❌❌❌ Статус:Кидала Контакты: @port7777 Претензия: Были куплены приемки на общую сумму 1000$ Поданы заявки на выплаты. Из-за войны на родине в Украине через месяц-два начал заходить на аккаунты, для проверки, и как выяснилось на всех аккаунтах был сменён пароль, нет доступа к почтам. Деньги уже в карманах Порта, либо его сотрудников. Пишу, так как это не единичный случай. Будьте бдительны. Переписка: https://t.me/+X…
🤯2👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍7🤡2
Voice message, posted without a caption
👍3
Ничего не напоминает? Ваши приемки (кеш на них) может оказаться в чужих руках. Делайте выводы. ⚓️ = 🐀
Я тебе говорю что они так работают, недостаточно? Мне попались аккаунты их клиентов залитые, чисто из солидарности я балансы не тронул, а мои залитые на десятки К благополучно спиздили другие, а со стороны порта и его саппа сэма я увидел только игнор
В каких бы объёмах ты не работал, пихать одни и те же акки нескольким подряд, а потом игнорить это адекватно?
Если ты про наш случай, то это не сравнимо абсолютно, одно дело когда твой сапп продал мне акки которые не подошли, чисто по незнанию , а другое когда у тебя на купленных аккаунтах оказываются чужие заливы, и ровно так же твои заливы видит другой человек, меняет данные аккаунта и пиздит деньги, сравнимо?
Пост для тех, у кого есть вопросы к @port7777 и его компаньону @mmmrrrda (только для тех у кого есть яйца доказать правду) — Мы поможем Вам составить грамотную позицию, четко подкрепив его доказательствами. Составим текст для открытия арбитража на WWH и прочих площадках где представлен сервис «Port VCC» — Посодействуем в возмещении материальных средств. — Придадим ситуацию к оглазке на просторах тг. Срок претензии …
👍3
❌ Претензия к @port7777 на 10.500$ ❌ Претензия от @mmmrrrda Заебался, приоткроем истину. Помимо претензии на 10.500$, так же претензия касательно 2 видеокарт 3080ti, 2 пары Versace кроссовок и прочего, достаточно много вещей. В кратце: был договор, мы сделали работу, деньги за работу @port7777 не оплатил, уже много месяцев морозит с оплатой. Деньги которые должен был выплатить мне занял своему другу, друг его кинул…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @port7777_scam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@port7777_scam named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@PORT7777 SCAM” (@port7777_scam), 13 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/port7777_scam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.