Channel
@poq_official
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,311subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002260923755 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @poq_official |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/poq_official |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 1,311 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 1,312 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 1,311 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 1,311 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,815 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
22 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 72.7% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 18.2% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Your soul will not obey on its own. It needs to be trained. It needs to be tamed. But it will submit — if you are diligent enough. 🤍 Are you ready to bend your soul to the obedience of Allāh? community.peopleofthequran.com
👍1
Not everyone who claims Tawheed will enter Jannah. There are criteria. There is a starting point. And most people don't know what it truly is. Learn the very first thing you need to have, to do, to be from the people of Tawheed. community.peopleofthequran.com
Struggling to Read the Quran? Listen to This Advice https://youtu.be/LsFAxS0Eh60?si=w_qiHcZ8eqfXYH2m Are you struggling to maintain a daily connection with the Qur’ān? In this uplifting reminder, we explore the immense spiritual necessity of dedicating time every single day to the Book of Allāh. Just as water gives life to plants, daily recitation sprouts īmān (faith), love for Allāh, and true happiness within you…
👍1
Nothing is Hidden From Him: Exploring Allah's Names of Knowledge — Lecture 23 In yesterday's session we learned that Al-Muhaymin is not simply a name about protection — it is a name that connects Allah's guardianship directly to His perfect, all-encompassing knowledge. Because true guardianship without complete awareness is impossible, and with Allah, both are absolute. From there we explored As-Shaheed, Al-Muhaymin…
🎬 We're Live! Click to Enter: https://community.peopleofthequran.com/c/live-lectures/lecture-23-nothing-is-hidden-from-him-exploring-allah-s-names-of-knowledge
🎯 60 Minutes - Get Ready Now: https://community.peopleofthequran.com/c/live-lectures/lecture-23-nothing-is-hidden-from-him-exploring-allah-s-names-of-knowledge 🎓 Your Tafsir Essentials Hub: https://tally.so/r/3xO54y?source=tg
🎯 Prepare Now - Class in 4 Hours: https://community.peopleofthequran.com/c/live-lectures/lecture-23-nothing-is-hidden-from-him-exploring-allah-s-names-of-knowledge ⏮️ Missed Last Class? Join the community and Watch the Replay: https://tally.so/r/3xO54y?source=tg
Tadabbur of the Qur'ān is an obligation upon every Muslim — the layman, the scholar, and the student alike. As for Tafsīr, that's a whole different subject. Learn tadabbur and tafsīr here: community.peopleofthequran.com
What do you know about the da'wah of Shaykh Muḥammad Ibn 'Abdul Wahhāb? Learn about the Qur'ān, the ultimate book of Tawḥīd: community.peopleofthequran.com
❤2
The Qur'ān You Read Today Is the Same One Read Thousands of Years Ago https://youtu.be/vvGy2GJQ734 What you recite today is the exact same revelation recited in the time of the Prophet ﷺ. The same words recited in Cairo. In Algeria. In the Levant. In India. In Makkah al-Mukarramah. Unchanged. Unaltered. Undefeatable. In this profound reminder, we reflect on a ḥadīth that places the miracle of the Qur'ān above eve…
❤1
You see the Qur'ān every day; you might even read it every day. But have you ever consciously thought to yourself, this is the very Qur'ān that the Prophet ﷺ received from Jibrīl 'Alayhi al-Salām. These are the very Words of Allāh that were on the tongue of our Prophet ﷺ and his companions. This is the same Qur'ān from thousands of years ago, unchanged! Do we really know the worth of this Book that we have today? L…
❤4
Have you heard people say something along the lines of: "Don't worry about it, it will be worth it in the end.", when doing something that is against the commands of Allāh? Maybe for doing something illegal, something haram, for the 'greater good'? Is this allowed in Islām? Is this the path that our Prophet ﷺ took in his da'wah and his struggles? Watch this reminder and find out. Join our community for free: commu…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @poq_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 160,600 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“People of the Quran” (@poq_official), 1,311 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poq_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.