Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pop Music History Trip

Channel

Pop Music History Trip

@popmusichistory

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,890subscribers

+27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001425298777
TypeChannel
Username@popmusichistory
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/popmusichistory

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8571,8901,873.56 August 2026 — 1,863 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,863 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,862 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,857 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,867 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,866 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,867 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,870 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,874 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,878 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,887 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,886 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,884 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,887 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,890 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net +27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,852–1,895 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:181,890+3
15 Sept 2026, 12:381,887+3
12 Sept 2026, 00:191,884-2
7 Sept 2026, 09:161,886-1
2 Sept 2026, 08:041,887+9
30 Aug 2026, 02:111,878+4
27 Aug 2026, 07:551,874+4
24 Aug 2026, 00:091,870+3
20 Aug 2026, 18:041,867+1
17 Aug 2026, 21:331,866-1
15 Aug 2026, 03:081,867+10
11 Aug 2026, 22:451,857-5
6 Aug 2026, 12:211,862-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:481,863no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:211,863first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC186 viewsread 7 August 2026

That’s entertainment (1980) Sound Affects另一首名曲,它宏大的英伦浮世绘其实也是Weller一气呵成迅速写出的白描,就像它朴素的扫弦。但在冷眼旁观

2 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC169 viewsread 7 August 2026

Pretty green (1980) 五专sound affects开场曲或许是乐队伴奏层次张力设计得最强的,从bass前奏到鼓的空气感到第二段躁动的吉他,都是契合主题的硬朗。旋律又炮制了一首耐听重复+惊喜转折。

1 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC159 viewsread 7 August 2026

Start! (1980) 著名的照搬披头士Taxman经典riff的冠单,即使有着自己的独特旋律发展 (怪不得Noel Gallagher人称Paul Weller门徒)与同时更张扬而微妙的演绎。它对变革的牵头与展望也奠定了Weller教父般的气场。

1 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC165 viewsread 7 August 2026

Going underground (1980) The Jam所有专辑外单曲最重量级的,或许也是他们演绎最具侵略性的,有着国歌式热血煽动力。Paul Weller在这里将流行性与时代发言人完美融合,为他们随后商业的进一步登顶铺平了道路。

31 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC151 viewsread 7 August 2026

Smithers jones (1979) The Jam少见由贝斯手Bruce foxton写的杰作,小职员的荒唐辛酸泪。专辑的弦乐版与单曲B面的吉他摇滚各有特色,流畅的巴洛克风味,令人唏嘘的欧亨利式结尾。

31 Jul 2026, 00:03 UTC138 viewsread 7 August 2026

Private hell (1979) 在我最喜欢他们的setting sons专辑 (虽然因为半概念半散装显得有些割裂) 里在上首他们最热烈的歌之后便是这首音乐最阴狠但力度与激情不减的。bass存在感很强,也有着一贯的精心设计的重复旋律与惊喜的bridge转折,和手术刀般的歌词。

30 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC118 viewsread 7 August 2026

Thick as thieves (1979) The Jam最浪漫的歌,可能也是我听过最美的关于“少年兄弟情”的,现实与滤镜的你中有我。演绎更是没有一秒拖泥带水,遗憾得如此激荡飞扬,到了bridge的stranger/ lone ranger的那两句词曲更是将浓度完全升华。

30 Jul 2026, 00:03 UTC134 viewsread 7 August 2026

Eton rifles (1979) Paul Weller的社会抨击在这首四专先行单曲里来到了新高。主副歌各自的重复理论上的有点单调也被音乐厚重的质感,表达出的理想的怒火完全化解。bridge与间奏则贡献了带着无奈的最大惊喜。

29 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC134 viewsread 7 August 2026

To be someone (1978) 另一首来自三专All mod cons的,也是乐队结构最出人意料的,虽然仍是短小精悍。从抓耳riff到节奏型的转折,从前面伴奏加入的对话到随着歌曲发展出现新的旋律,过山车般的精彩。它说的名利场难道不也是如此吗,即使也是一地鸡毛。

28 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC153 viewsread 7 August 2026

Down in the tube station at midnight (1978) The Jam生涯最“长篇”的名曲,也有着他们最独特的前奏,仿佛同年的the police的标志性律动,在这里则为地铁里的可怕故事做了贴切的铺垫。主歌的不祥烘托与副歌平铺直叙的转折撑起了它的篇幅。

28 Jul 2026, 00:03 UTC133 viewsread 7 August 2026

Aunties and uncles (1978) The Jam和许多经典英国乐队都在专辑外有许多高质量单曲,但其中我相对最有感觉的之一却是这首B面,在轻松与严肃,熟悉与惊喜之间的平衡。

27 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC112 viewsread 7 August 2026

Life from a window (1977) The Jam二专虽然总体更平淡但也开始了对深度的追求,这首苦乐参半的基调经过Weller旋律灵感的表达令人难忘。

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @popmusichistory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pop Music History Trip” (@popmusichistory), 1,890 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/popmusichistory.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.