Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Тонально ваша

Channel

Тонально ваша

@poop_culture

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,011subscribers

-177 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001326624065
TypeChannel
Username@poop_culture
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/poop_culture

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,0113,1883,099.57 August 2026 — 3,188 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,188 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,180 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,162 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,145 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,120 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,105 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,096 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,083 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,073 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,060 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,039 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,031 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,011 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -177. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,984–3,215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:203,011-20
14 Sept 2026, 01:013,031-8
10 Sept 2026, 16:373,039-21
6 Sept 2026, 00:203,060-13
1 Sept 2026, 19:043,073-10
29 Aug 2026, 11:483,083-13
26 Aug 2026, 14:193,096-9
23 Aug 2026, 23:473,105-15
20 Aug 2026, 06:553,120-25
16 Aug 2026, 22:023,145-17
13 Aug 2026, 09:463,162-18
10 Aug 2026, 19:143,180-8
7 Aug 2026, 15:013,188no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:593,188first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 25 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

345 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10731.0%
🥰5114.8%
👍4713.6%
😁3911.3%
custom 51949365513850862043510.1%
😢257.25%
custom 5325551635047390647205.80%
🤩185.22%
👎20.58%
😱10.29%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 345 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC304 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✳️Если бы вы могли выпустить гель для душа с ЛЮБЫМ ароматом, то что бы это было? Чего вам не хватает среди всех этих кокосов/персиков и тд?

4

22 Jul 2026, 11:18 UTC336 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы?

👍16😁5custom 51949365513850862045

21 Jul 2026, 19:39 UTC382 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мир сошел с ума? Или почему от меня прятали этот СС-крем… внимание всем белоснежкам: ОН НЕ ОКИСЛЯЕТСЯ В ОРАНЖЕВЫЙ! А ещё я наносила его руками. Я никогда так не делаю! Потому что обычно получается говно Но тут — роскошно! Если честно, я очень скептически относилась к бренду и его возможностям в декоративной косметике, но от этого удивления ещё больше. Я могу сказать, что это лучший CC-крем, который я пробовала

11👍6🥰4

21 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTC341 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вывод за последние дни: нет никакой ориентации, мы все любим Шакиру

😁149🥰3

20 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC346 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Розмаринового настроения 🌿 Мои любимые TaShe обошли всех на Женском фестивале спорта — у них был самый красивый поп-ап! 🥹 Ну что тут сказать — если вы не пробовали пилинг для кожи головы из этой линии, то попробуйте. И везде, где видите бренд, обязательно подходите знакомиться: у ребят такая замечательная команда! Если вы это читаете — люблю вас, дорогие 🤍

11👍6custom 51949365513850862044

20 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC346 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я всё ещё люблю дурацкие мемы

😁20🥰5👍3custom 51949365513850862042

19 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC402 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Причина хеира ✍🏻 Нашла бренд, который меня реально удивил. А это редкость) Основала его девушка из Петербурга. И сделала то, что почти никто не делает честно — несмываемый уход с ароматами уровня нишевой парфюмерии. Не «как Tom Ford», не оммаж, не заигрывание на популярных ароматах — это я не понимаю... Тут у всех средств свой характер запаха, который сразу считывается как дорогой. 🩷Это Elletodo. Тестирую две сыв

8🥰5👍4

19 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC351 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Объёмчика захотелось 💨 Как вам хеир?

21🤩8custom 51949365513850862046

18 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC382 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤩109custom 51949365513850862042

18 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC393 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

P.S. Картинка — чисто реклама спрея glance от LIMBA. Клянусь, он такой же блеск даёт волосам!

custom 519493655138508620498👍5

18 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC408 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новая жизнь — новая аватарка — новое название ❤️ Давно пора было обновиться, всё тянула. Теперь делаю! Мне хотелось объединить в названии одновременно суть близости и теплоты, которые я стараюсь в этом канале собрать и косметику 🧴 Тональность канала во всех смыслах раскрыта ❤️‍🔥 Так что не теряйте! Тонально ваша, Полина

20🥰7👍4

17 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC385 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вернулась и как будто из меня вытащили заряд. С понедельника выхожу делать маркетинг в новый бренд — потрясающий, вы его знаете и я скоро поделюсь подробностями, я правда рада — но плотность каждого дня по событиям уже на 150%, а сил… ноль целых ноль десятых. И вот что бесит: единственное, что стабильно работало всё это время — это посылки с косметикой. Они приезжали, а я даже коробки не открывала. Сейчас у меня скл

🥰21😢9custom 519493655138508620474

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @poop_culture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Big Beauty Boss
@bigbeautyboss · 84,131
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тонально ваша” (@poop_culture), 3,011 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poop_culture.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.