Обсуждал с Gemini некотрые тонкости хинди, в том числе kripaya и dilchasp (ну, раз уж у тебя отпуск 😄). В очередной раз убеждаюсь в правильном выборе преподавателя!
❤12😁6custom 53886278597639017676

Channel
@ponyatniy_hindi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,753subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001840455083 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ponyatniy_hindi |
| Created | 4 December 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ponyatniy_hindi |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 1,753 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 1,755 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 1,754 | +5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 1,749 | +10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 1,739 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 1,733 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 1,735 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 1,733 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 1,729 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 1,730 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 1,736 | +6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 1,730 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 1,729 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 1,729 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
290 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 161 | 55.5% | |
| 🔥 | 54 | 18.6% | |
| custom 5388627859763901767 | 26 | 8.97% | |
| 😁 | 22 | 7.59% | |
| ❤🔥 | 20 | 6.90% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 1.72% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.69% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ponyatniy_hindi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Обсуждал с Gemini некотрые тонкости хинди, в том числе kripaya и dilchasp (ну, раз уж у тебя отпуск 😄). В очередной раз убеждаюсь в правильном выборе преподавателя!
❤12😁6custom 53886278597639017676
Только ленивый не знает, что мировое цыганство имеет индо-арийские корни. По самой распространенной теории, цыгане вышли из Индостана лет этак 1000+ назад и пошли на северо-запад до Армении, Балкан и так далее. Я очень люблю Кустурицу, и движимая лигвистическим интересом, посмотрела "Черную кошку, белый кот" на языке оригинала. Язык оригинала - притянутая за уши фраза здесь, потому что в фильмах говорят сразу на все…
❤22❤🔥5
Коротко о том, как я пишу уроки для студентов Б2, с отборными темами про коммерциализацию кино, мемами про бихарцев, поиски драгоценных камней в индийском мусоре и собственный религиозный стартап. Обещаю, таких твистов нет ни в одном ныне существующем учебнике или программе по изучению хинди)
❤16custom 53886278597639017677😁4🔥3❤🔥1
В фильме Darjeeling Limited Уэса Андерсона герои путешетсвуют по Индии в купе скорого поезда в направлении Дарджилинга. Картина, конечно, хоть и красивая, но вообще не претендует на то, чтобы показать нам правдивую Индию. Поэтому фильм про поезд на Дарджилинг ни на кадр не был снят в Дарджилинге. И скорого поезда с конечной станцией Дарджилинг тоже не существует в природе. Тамошняя железная дорога идет в Дарджилинг …
❤20🔥2
Новостишки на сегодня такие, что буду с рассказом про первое путешествие в Индию на фестивале День Индии в Москве, 21 августа в 19.00. Ещё напомню, но кто хотел увидеться - апка свагат 🙏
❤17🔥2
Пишет моя студентка, которая очень тщательно разжевала тему про каузативы и внезапно обнаружила себя на четвёртой картинке ✨ мэджик, реально!
🔥11😁4
Отвечу сослагательным наклонением, и заодно ненавязчиво напомню про завтрашний вебинар ⚠️ Кто еще не успел? Алоха вам. वो लोग मुखौटे उल्टा पहनते हैं ताकि अपनी जान बचाएं Vo log mukhote ulta pehente hain taaki apni jaan bachayen Эти люди носят маски наоборот, чтобы спасти свою жизнь. От тигров-людоедов. Которые втихаря нападают сзади. Маски с лицами не дают тигру сообразить, что это спина. Ну вроде как.
🔥17custom 53886278597639017676❤2
#Индия #хинди #путешествие Пока готовлю лекцию про Восточную Индию, покажу вам сундарбанского жителя в маске, надетой наоборот. Классическая так-то картина для бедных жителей этого региона. Отгадаете, почему они так носят?
❤3👀3
Кому точно нужно на вебинар по сослагательному наклонению, а кому пока может быть рановато
❤9custom 53886278597639017673👀2
В эту пятницу проведу практикум по сослагательному наклонению в хинди. Скажите же, что вы тоже до сих пор енту штуку не до конца поняли, है न? 😅 Разжуем все кейсы, когда оно нам точно пригодится; узнаем лайфхак, как не путать его с условными предложениями; помечтаем, песни послушаем, поговорим по душам, поплачем 🫶 ⏰ 24 июля в 19.00 мск Занимаемся в Зуме, вход на встречу за донаты, запись будет, всё как всегда. П…
❤16🔥11custom 53886278597639017672
⚡️ Сегодня в 21.30 снова хочу читать рассказы индийских писателей на русском языке в Зум. Встреча бесплатная, продолжительность 15-30 минут. Ссылка та же, что и прежде. Если вы еще не были на подобных встречах, но хотите присоединиться, ставьте + в комментариях, я пришлю ссылку Кто планирует присоединиться? 😌
❤10
Успокаивающее видео для тех, кто все еще забывает вставлять ने ne в предложения с однократным завершенным действием в прошлом. Смотрите, что говорят: ...bhagawan Sri Ram kya kiye the? Что сделал бог Рам? Теперь следите за руками: 🔴 не вставили в предложение ne 🔴тогда логично согласовать глагол с тем, кто действие совершил, т.е. так, как мы делаем во всех нормальных предложениях 🔴Рам вообще-то бог, поэтому о нем го…
❤18😁8🕊2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ponyatniy_hindi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Понятный Хинди | Аня Раневская” (@ponyatniy_hindi), 1,753 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ponyatniy_hindi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.