Channel
@pontemnetworkchannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,327subscribers
-51 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001499287475 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pontemnetworkchannel |
| Created | Between 1 June 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pontemnetworkchannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 8,327 | -31 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 8,358 | -15 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 8,373 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 8,378 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 8,378 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 2 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
55 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 34 | 61.8% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 14.5% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 10.9% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 9.09% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2025 to 2 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Security notice from Pontem🚨 We’ve noticed an increase in impersonation attempts involving people claiming to represent Pontem team members. To be clear: • Pontem team members never initiate private messages first. • We never ask you to run unknown code locally or share any sensitive data. • All official communication happens only via our verified channels. If someone claims to be from Pontem and contacts you dir…
❤2🕊1
❗️Pontem Network provides an alternative way to withdraw funds via Liquidswap DEX Client. Due to Pontem Wallet and Liquidswap being disconnected from the Aptos Indexer, withdrawals now need to be completed manually. How to withdraw funds: 1. Connect Petra Wallet to https://pontem-network.github.io/liquidswap-client/ 2. Select the required liquidity pool 3. Withdraw liquidity If you have active liquidity positions…
👏3
New look on X. Take a peek and share your thoughts👀
👏5
⚡️ So what’s DAT? Let’s break down a trend that could have as much impact as ETFs. Check out our X post so you don’t miss it: click here 🖱
👍2
LP issue is fixed. We're currently working on displaying balances ASAP. Stay tuned for updates.
🔥2
What’s happening with $LSD? ⚡️ Investor tokens have officially unlocked and are being distributed in line with the vesting schedule. 🔗 Read more Here’s a glimpse of what’s coming: - Multi-chain expansion: support for more Move-based chains - Massive UX improvements: across Liquidswap, Pontem Wallet, and our other core products - Powerful new trading tools: including features designed to increase volume, efficie…
❤3
There’s a new chapter unfolding at Pontem👀 We’ve been building quietly and deliberately, laying the groundwork for what’s next. And now, it’s almost time. Before we show you what we’ve been working on, we’re making sure everything is rock solid. Here’s what’s coming: → Support for more Move chains → Major UX upgrades across our core products → Powerful new trading features and products → Stronger $LSD integration…
🔥6
GM, fam 🫡 Big thanks to everyone who joined. We really appreciate the love🤝 Congrats to the winners🎉 Check your DMs on X 💌 For transparency, the selection video is attached to this post. And if you commented, don’t forget to check your DMs too 👀
🔥2
Hey community, We’re looking for skilled traders experienced with prop firms. Help us spread the word by retweeting this post👉 https://x.com/PontemNetwork/status/1944808061907943675 💰On July 21, we’ll pick 5 lucky winners to receive $20 USDC each. Thanks for your support🫶
GM🫡 We’re looking to connect with traders currently working with prop firms or actively exploring that path. If that sounds like you, we’d love to hear from you. Drop a “ME” in the chat or reach out via DM. Let’s talk👇
🔥3
Happy 4th to the sleepless devs, wild traders, and quiet lurkers 🇺🇸💜
🔥5
🏁The Liquidswap Trading Competition is officially over🏆 4 weeks. 40 winners. 30,000 $MOVE prize pool. 🔥 Winners for the last 3 weeks have been selected and rewards have been sent. 🔗 Check the lists: - Week 2 winners - Week 3 winners - Week 4 winners 🏅 Week 1 winners are listed in this post. 📹For full transparency, we’ve attached a video with all results. 💬Share your feedback about Liquidswap on Movement in our…
🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @pontemnetworkchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 287,239 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pontem Lumio Announcements” (@pontemnetworkchannel), 8,327 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pontemnetworkchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.