Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Empathy Lab (ux/cx-research)

Channel

Empathy Lab (ux/cx-research)

@polzovatelurulya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

146subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002175864112
TypeChannel
Username@polzovatelurulya
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/polzovatelurulya

Growth

145146145.57 August 2026 — 145 subscribers8 August 2026 — 145 subscribers15 August 2026 — 146 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 145–146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:15146+1
8 Aug 2026, 21:15145no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:17145first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 12 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
52s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

108 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4743.5%
3835.2%
😁1513.9%
👍87.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 27 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Apr 2026, 15:04 UTC257 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ребят, а расскажи плз о чем написать в след посте! Я в каком-то кризисном состоянии по контенту) P.S. ток не про ИИ ради Христа...

27 Apr 2026, 13:57 UTC252 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мне кажется, что пока ты продолжаешь волноваться перед презентацией результатов своей работы - ты живой и ты еще не замылился. Сегодня чет сильно переживала, аж даже макияж сделала)) Еще раз скажу, что мне помогает подготовиться к спич презентации: 1. Репетирую выступление 3-4 раза прям вслух, прям можно под запись. 2. Смотрю на данные с критической точки зрения и задаю себе вопросы (надеваю маску слушателя). Сама

🔥16👍1

6 Apr 2026, 14:45 UTC277 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

сегодня мне подкинули вот такую схему про вину) Мне оч от нее смешно ахахха

😁156

10 Feb 2026, 10:53 UTC365 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @heads_ecosystemPhoto

✏️ Как изменятся интерфейсы под влиянием AI AI и LLM уже начинают менять логику интерфейсов, встраиваются в привычные продукты и влияют на то, как пользователи с ними взаимодействуют. Где-то AI встраивают в существующие интерфейсы, чаще всего в виде чата. А в других кейсах он изначально становится частью логики продукта, а не отдельной функцией. Что из этого временно, а что задержится надолго — показываем в карточ

🔥3

7 Feb 2026, 17:56 UTC304 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ищем исследователя 💖 https://career.avito.com/vacancies/ux-issledovaniya/18670/

🔥6👍4

29 Jan 2026, 15:20 UTC350 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кстати! Я теперь отвечаю за исследования всего баерского (пользователи, которые снимают жилье посуточно) опыта в Авито Путешествиях. Честно, я не знаю…хорошо это или плохо…знаю одно, что мне пизда точно удастся вырасти 😂 В общем...такие новости...работки и ответственности прибавилось и не знаю будет ли время на канал( Хочется жить жизнь!

19🔥8

26 Jan 2026, 11:01 UTC357 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В прошлом году 3 моих команды решили 5 проблем из ux-бэклога (где лежат проблемы в том числе из Аудита) и еще 10 проблем сейчас "в работе" 🤘 Инструментик рабочий!!

🔥4

26 Jan 2026, 10:43 UTC327 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, выбралась из послепраздничной апатии! Делюсь свежим опытом - как UX-аудит запускает эмпатию, формирует бэклог и подводит к OKR. 🌟 Что такое UX-аудит в нашем случае: командная сессия, где все от дизайнеров и редакторов до ЛПР - проходят ключевой сцеанрий как пользователи. 👀 Цель простая: выявить и сократить критические UX-боли в топ-сценариях. Те самые, что убивают конверсию и бизнес-результаты. 🔨Как подгот

🔥105👍3

12 Jan 2026, 14:58 UTC296 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Состояние примерно такое Всем привет! Возвращаемся из загула в трудовые будни!🎅

8

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @polzovatelurulya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Empathy Lab (ux/cx-research)” (@polzovatelurulya), 146 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polzovatelurulya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.