Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

АЛЬFА k₽ЙПТА v2.0

@polyy

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,026subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001511030299
TypeChannel
Usernames@a1pha_crypto @polyy
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/polyy

Growth

5,0265,0445,0356 August 2026 — 5,044 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,044 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,044 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,043 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,043 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,036 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,035 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,026 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,026 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,023–5,047 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:345,026no change
13 Aug 2026, 00:065,026-9
10 Aug 2026, 10:325,035-1
9 Aug 2026, 23:365,036-7
7 Aug 2026, 09:545,043no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:525,043-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:155,044no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:305,044no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:195,044first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

29 Jun 2026, 19:38 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 12 August 2026

х2 за два дня. Устраивает, нет? @a1pha_crypto

29 Jun 2026, 19:38 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ну че, как там ваша встреча в Швейцарии? Днем было х1.06 на НЕТ.

29 Jun 2026, 17:59 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вы думаете они угомонятся когда-нибудь? Я думаю нет. Поэтому, что я делаю? Правильно. Запускаю Portex. И ставлю на ATH по нефти в этом году. Хуй угадаешь, че они там еще заготовили, но всё может быть. х6,25 коэффициент, это пиздец как много. @a1pha_crypto

29 Jun 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Напомнить вам битву за бакинскую нефть? Которая продолжалась десятилетиями и в итоге вообще привела к секретным Анакаррийским соглашениям 1928-го. Их рассекретели спустя 30 лет. Французский знаете? На английском они статью не удосужились написать — https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accord_d%27Achnacarry Те самые американские ковбои и британские джентельмены как обычно собрались в полумраке, в одном из Шотландских замко

29 Jun 2026, 17:56 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Американские ковбои и британские джентельмены продолжают ДЕЛИТЬ МИР между собой. Напомнить вам 1954-й год? Когда иранская нефть сначала на 100% принадлежала Британии, потом пришли америкосы и отжали 40% себе. @a1pha_crypto

29 Jun 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Зашел почитать свежие новости. Пишут: - крупные нефтяные компании переживают самый успешный год. - европейские гиганты BP и Shell превзошли американские ExxonMobil, Chevron А вы нахуй сомневались, что они устроили весь этот переполох в Иране, чтобы свою черную жижу выгоднее торгануть? И в очередной раз блять сцепились между собой ОПЯТЬ ОНИ МЕРЯЮТСЯ ХУЯМИ ДРУГ С ДРУГОМ Кто же больше бабла лутанул, BP или ExxonMo

28 Jun 2026, 19:34 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Скажите мне кем нужно быть, чтобы выиграть этот розыгрыш, имея шанс 1 на 5350? А если бы вы были внимательнее, то наверняка бы знали что везучие люди часто оказываются еще и мощными провидцами. Что я делаю? Аккуратненько выявляю ту самую Вангу, которая затерялась среди 5350 человек. 1. Через сутки будут результаты розыгрыша. Они сразу будут удалены. Нихуя вы не успеете увидеть никнейм победителя. 2. Сам же я связ

28 Jun 2026, 19:26 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 12 August 2026

Я похож на человека, который просто так будет такими деньжищами сорить? Пять тыщ звезд. Нихуя себе. Садитесь и думайте, зачем я втянул 5350 человек в этот жуткий розыгрыш. У вас 3 минуты.

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @polyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 770,006 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BIOMACHINE
@bmchn · 174,941
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АЛЬFА k₽ЙПТА v2.0” (@polyy), 5,026 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polyy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.