Video, posted without a caption

Channel
Polygon nft's Channel
@polygonnftsofficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001658295320 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @polygonnftsofficial |
| Description | We aim to transform Ethereum into a multi-chain ecosystem with secured Layer 2 & standalone chains | support polygon nft. COMMUNITY CHAT @polygonnftsofficialgroup |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 11 December 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/polygonnftsofficial |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 9 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 9 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 31
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2021 to 25 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
SHALL WE START COMMUNITY AMA'S WITH PROJECTS & 50$ - 100$ FOR COMMUNITY PEOPLE? Reply vote guys...
- Yes!95%
- No!5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
SHARE THIS LINK WITH YOUR NFT CREATORS FRIENDS AND LET'S HELP THEM TO SELL THERE ART WORKS. FREE WEEKLY AMA's ARE GOING TO START SOON. 🌌 Only NFTs 🌌 No bans 🌌 Media Allowed 🌌 All NFT shill groups __ For collaborations contact us | Support us on twitter @0xpolygonnft JOIN NOW POLYGON NFTS https://t.me/polygonnftsofficialgroup
SEND YOUR NFT GIFTS OR ANY CONTRIBUTION TO THE OPENSEA LINKED ADDRESS OF OWNERS. https://opensea.io/0xPolygonnfts
POLYGON TICKETS https://opensea.io/collection/polygontickets?search[sortAscending]=true&search[sortBy]=CREATED_DATE
OUR FIRST EVER COLLABORATED NFT PROJECT WITH @SwarrowNfts WEEKLY 100$ USDT CONTEST. ONLY 100 TICKETS IN PHASE 1. PARTICIPATE NOW! POLYGON TICKETS! opensea.io/collection/pol… #POLYGONTICKETS #opensea #Collection #NFTCommumity https://twitter.com/0xpolygonnft/status/1565456995498721280?t=gUQyfta5FluJRmpjO-2Cqw&s=19
https://twitter.com/sandeepnailwal/status/1552414895764697088?t=SWZRLUD4B46JiFDO-6WQLw&s=19
ARE YOU LOOKING TO DEPLOY YOUR OWN COLLECTION CONTACT ON BSC OR POLYGON? IF YES! YOU ARE AT RIGHT PLACE, WE ARE HERE TO HELP YOU DEPLOY YOUR OWN COLLECTION CONTRACT ON POLYGON OR BINANCE. NEED 5$ TO DEPLOY YOUR BINANCE COLLECTION CONTRACT AND 2$ FOR POLYGON COLLECTION CONTRACT. NO INITIAL FEES OR CHARGES ITS FREE FOR ALL. CONTACT:- @abedali702
🔥1
A suggestion for polygon nft's Lovers For POLYGON NETWORK NFT'S. Please be sure to mint atleast 50 or 100 items in a single collection related item to each other. Please be kind with eachother and add your known artists to develop the community. welcome new members and praise their art work doesn't cost you, Love you all 💗
❤2
May the high spirits of Eid Al-Adha fill our homes and hearts with happiness and hopes. Happy #EidAdhaMubarak FROM POLYGON NFT'S COMMUNITY
SHALL WE START PUSHING YOUR NFT PROJECTS WITH AMA OR TWITTER SPACES?
- Yes!88%
- No!13%
- Not sure!0%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Keep showering your love on each other by supporting each others projects. THIS IS HOW WE CAN BUILD A GREAT NFT COMMUNITY Soon we will start pushing your projects on twitter spaces and telegram AMA. HOPE YOU ALL LOVE TO SHARE YOUR ART EXPERIENCE WITH EACH AND EVERYONE. FOLLOW US ON TWITTER. TAG US & GET RETWEETED. https://twitter.com/0xpolygonnft
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @polygonnftsofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
SHALL WE START COMMUNITY AMA'S WITH PROJECTS & 50$ - 100$ FOR COMMUNITY PEOPLE? Reply vote guys...
- Yes!95%
- No!5%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
SHALL WE START PUSHING YOUR NFT PROJECTS WITH AMA OR TWITTER SPACES?
- Yes!88%
- No!13%
- Not sure!0%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2021 to 25 December 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@polygonnftsofficial named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Polygon nft's Channel” (@polygonnftsofficial), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polygonnftsofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.