Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝓟𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓪

Channel

𝓟𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓪

@pollylastochka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

385subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002550948884
TypeChannel
Username@pollylastochka
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pollylastochka

Growth

374385379.57 August 2026 — 375 subscribers8 August 2026 — 374 subscribers8 August 2026 — 374 subscribers15 August 2026 — 385 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 372–387 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 08:34385+11
8 Aug 2026, 06:18374no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:17374-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:09375first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.2%
avg views ÷ 385 subscribers
Avg views / post
189
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held9 (22 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,704
Reactions total308
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

308 reactions across 9 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53012863583152118536119.8%
custom 54338219194240606495116.6%
custom 54293903807579693163310.7%
🙈299.42%
custom 6309749859146537744237.47%
custom 5445154663080940811196.17%
custom 5303174529017737126175.52%
custom 6194820313876795593175.52%
🔥165.19%
custom 5318893220262868359154.87%
custom 5431421307583503983154.87%
❤‍🔥61.95%
💯61.95%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 308reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC106 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уже видели, новую уходовую линейку от Гоар? 🪷 Меня вот заинтересовал спрей-тонер, думаю, стоит заказать 💜

custom 54451546630809408118🙈6custom 53188932202628683596custom 54314213075835039831

4 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC124 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

medicube - моя новая любовь 🤩🌸💗

custom 544515466308094081110custom 54293903807579693168custom 63097498591465377446🙈1custom 53012863583152118531

1 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC166 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

они издеваются, выпустили 2 версию 🙄🗿

custom 530128635831521185315🙈10💯6custom 54338219194240606492custom 54451546630809408111

30 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC180 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

новинки от DOPE, что твориите 🥺 моя самая любимая пудра сейчас со скидкой в 50% 🥥

🔥11custom 54314213075835039838custom 53031745290177371267🙈3custom 53012863583152118531

29 Jul 2026, 05:54 UTC180 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

вкусные новинки с наших магазинов, рааай для девочек 🤩🤩

custom 530128635831521185316custom 542939038075796931613custom 530317452901773712610custom 54314213075835039833🙈1

23 Jul 2026, 01:50 UTC293 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

два месяца непрерывно хожу в это место,кажется,я тут надолго ещё 🙄

custom 543382191942406064922custom 542939038075796931612❤‍🔥6🙈4custom 54314213075835039831custom 63097498591465377441

22 Jul 2026, 05:56 UTC232 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ещё, что успела попробовать рекомендуую! 😍💔

custom 530128635831521185321custom 543382191942406064910custom 63097498591465377449🙈2custom 54314213075835039831

22 Jul 2026, 00:50 UTC217 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

телефон тоже обновился 🤎

custom 619482031387679559317custom 63097498591465377447🔥5custom 53188932202628683592🙈1

22 Jul 2026, 00:40 UTC206 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

последние покупки 🧺💜

custom 543382191942406064917custom 53012863583152118537custom 53188932202628683597🙈1custom 54314213075835039831

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @pollylastochka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,232,840 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝓟𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓪” (@pollylastochka), 385 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pollylastochka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.