Channel
@politiquess
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
199subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002574010337 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @politiquess |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/politiquess |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 199 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 196 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 196 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 404 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Mr. President, I am disappointed in you! Mr. President! Various parts of your recent interview were truly neither befitting of the dignified nation of Iran nor worthy of this great and powerful country. Has America attacked China, or assaulted its leader, citizens, and scientists, that you hold up the absence of war between China and America as an example for us?! Do you not realize that in a situation where we were…
Trump rejects US missile shortage claims as sources say stockpiles running low Sources tell ABC News that when the president called off a new recent attack on iran he took into consideration warnings from his advisors that the missile stockpile was dwindling. #ABC #News
CNN, citing sources: Trump has been aware of potential ammunition shortages for months, and the reports were not surprising to him. Trump is furious that this information has been leaked at a critical juncture in the confrontation with Iran, when he wants to project a position of strength. Oh, look at that—Big Strongman Donald, the guy who promised to be the toughest kid on the block, suddenly finds out that his "…
"Iran's economy has suffered more from the repetition of tried-and-failed policies than from a lack of ideas. As long as 'the same thinking,' 'the same people,' and 'the same policies' persist, one can expect nothing but inflation, declining purchasing power, and a shrinking table for the people." You know, when I read something like this, I just nod my head like, yep, been saying that for years. It’s not that we do…
🔻The Option of Assassinating Trump: Tomorrow Is Too Late... Trump, that despicable American devil, said in his latest remarks: "I wanna give them every last chance before decapitation." The word "decapitation" means beheading and severing the head. In political and military science, the "decapitation strategy" refers to eliminating the leaders or the apex of an institution. Therefore, there is no doubt that Trump i…
Man, I gotta get this off my chest. Every time I turn on the news and see more about this Iran thing, I just feel sick. This isn’t politics anymore—this is just pure, stubborn stupidity. We keep hearing about "surgical strikes" and "sending a message," but come on. Who are we kidding? We’re poking a hornet's nest with a stick, and we’re shocked when we get stung. There’s no knockout punch here. You can’t bomb an id…
Scott Morefield The Iran war isn't just the biggest misstep of Trump's presidency so far, it's one of the greatest strategic blunders in modern American history. The worst part is there is no making things better, only worse, and the longer we keep at it the worse it's going to get. There is no chance for 'victory' here, at all. There never was. Best case would be to stop cold turkey, cut our losses, and get the bes…
The Difference Between Ashura and Arbaeen What Ashura and Arbaeen of the year 61 share is clear and profound: both represent a current of jihad, opposition to tyranny, resistance against an unjust ruler, devotion to duty, and the pursuit of noble ideals. But Arbaeen is the harder of the two. Until the afternoon of Ashura, the Imam was still alive—the great calamities and unprecedented atrocities had not yet unfolde…
🔻The People's Miracle of Arbaeen Through the Eyes of a Western Media Activist! 🔹American media activist Jennifer Kings' account of the human ocean of Arbaeen: "No government pays for anything here; everything is spontaneous and driven by the people!"
Informed sources: In the event of an attack on Iran's energy infrastructure, as a first step, these two major power plants of the Zionist regime will be destroyed with dozens of missiles. They can try it and experience hell. 1. Orot Rabin Power Plant – located in the city of Hadera, on Israel's coastal strip, approximately midway between Tel Aviv and Haifa. Its exact location is along the Mediterranean coast, with …
A Brotherly Word to My Honorable Sister, Ms. Mohajerani! (A Note) 1. What follows are excerpts from the recent remarks of Ms. Mohajerani, the esteemed government spokesperson. Please read: a. "Our enemy has correctly identified the economic and social resilience of the people as a target, and is rightly aiming at it (and by 'rightly' I mean it has chosen the right target), whereas our approach is far more correc…
⚫️ If it's not for us, then to hell with it... A friend from one of our regions sent me a message after American and Zionist media, citing sources close to the lying Trump, reported on a joint Crusader-Zionist attack on our country's infrastructure. His message was remarkable and significant: 🔸 "In just 45 minutes, we will plunge the entire West Asia and the occupied territories into absolute darkness; one hour aft…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @politiquess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 371,485 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📡Learn English with Politics” (@politiquess), 199 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/politiquess.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.