Channel
@politikszt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001242330017 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @politikszt |
| Description | Аналітика, юмор, раследования |
| Created | 20 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/politikszt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 19 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 19 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 24 October 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 8 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 17 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 30 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
Вышел материал, где упоминается ключевое слово: [Житомир, Сухомлин]; Категория: Региональные СМИ; Потенциальный охват: Очень низкий Ссылка: https://www.zhitomir.info/news_196220.html
«Чесна» виборча система: депутатами стають кандидати, які набрали значно менше, ніж інші кандидати в списку партії! До прикладу: від ОПЗЖ ПРОЙШЛИ в депутати Житомирської міської ради Гринчук - 72 голоси; Самборський - 120 голосів; Півоварова - 198 голосів. НЕ ПРОЙШЛИ: Юзвинський - 604 голоси; Маліновський - 506 голосів; Тичина - 421 голос! P. S. Виборчий кодекс не відображає ВОЛЕВИЯВЛЕННЯ ГРОМАДИ https://www.faceb…
Житомирська міська ТВК оголосила РЕЗУЛЬТАТИ ВИБОРІВ 1⃣ Сергій Сухомлин перемагає у першому турі з результатом - 29 185 голосів. 2⃣ На другому місці Віктор Євдокимов – 7 136 голосів. 3⃣ Третя – Наталія Леонченко – 5266 голосів. Кількість голосів виборців поданих за кожного кандидата: – Демчик Євгеній, «Радикальна Партія Олега Ляшка» – 1 078 – Дяченко Андрій, «За Майбутнє» – 570 – Євдокимов Віктор, «Слуга народу» …
🇺🇦 Кто прошёл в Житомирский областной совет? — список партий и депутатов. Официальные данные ТИК 👉: https://freshnews.zt.ua/news/kto-proshyel-v-zhitomirskiy-oblastnoy-sovet-spisok-partiy-i-deputatov-foto/
😆 Кривую свастику и надпись "уроды" защитали как голос за партию ✅ Вчера на пересчете голосов на одном из избирательных участков Житомира представители ТИК в ходе беседы, аргументируя законодательством, что учитывается любое обозначение в квадратике, признали бюллетень с неким солярным знаком и ругательством возле кандидатов действительным. Смотреть фото. +1 голос за "Европейскую солидарность"! Члены ТИК, как бы, …
Офіційно. В Житомирську міську раду пройшли 42 депутата від 6 партій.
ЗВІТ-2016 - Бази водних видів спорту немає, виріс лише приватний будинок. - Транспортна концепція: хаос, а пріоритет комунального транспорту залишився десь в минулому. - Е-квиток: постійне списування коштів, пільги діють лише з карткою «Житомирянина», а перевізники, що хочуть те і роблять - Рекламні конструкції ростуть як гриби, вся концепція закінчується на вулиці Михайлівській. - Якщо подивитись на «Жовтень» сього…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @politikszt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@politikszt named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Местные Выборы” (@politikszt), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/politikszt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.