Channel
@political_aya_tweetbank
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,307subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001648510128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @political_aya_tweetbank |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/political_aya_tweetbank |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 1,307 | -6 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 1,313 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 1,312 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 1,315 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:04 | 1,317 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 1,319 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 1,320 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 1,322 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 1,323 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 1,327 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 1,329 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 1,329 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
267 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 195 | 73.0% | |
| 💯 | 41 | 15.4% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 4.49% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 2.25% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.87% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 1.50% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.12% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.375% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 267 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
If Iran hadn't responded, they would have said Iran is all talk, no action. Now that Iran has responded, their argument is, "Why didn't Iran do this for the South," knowing well that most of these people do not even care about the South, and supported the Lebanese president in his positions when he surrendered it to the enemy. Such statements simply aim to sow discord. When Iran set the condition that all wars in the…
💯28❤3👍2🔥1
Statement Issued by the Operations Room of the Islamic Resistance Regarding the Enemy's Presence at the Historic Beaufort Castle (Qal'at al-Chqif) In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful {Those who are fought against are permitted [to fight] for they have been wronged, & Allah is indeed able to help them prevail} Due to the significant negative impact that the footage released by the Islamic Resi…
❤14
The Resistance and its people are delivering an extraordinary performance that has astonished both friend and foe, so do not stab it in the back. We are not calling on you to adopt its convictions, but we call on you not to serve the enemy’s trench in this sensitive phase. As for the State, their duty is to preserve national unity, achieve sovereignty, order the army to defend the country, ensure protection for all c…
❤11
Statement by His Eminence Sheikh Naim Kassem, Secretary-General of Hezbollah: In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful Praise be to Allah who guided us to carry the banner of truth, and peace and blessings be upon the Master of Messengers, Mohammad (PBUH), his pure and guiding progeny, and his chosen companions. We are facing a dangerous phase in the history of our region and the future of our co…
❤4
Statement by His Eminence Sheikh Naim Kassem, Secretary-General of Hezbollah: The "israeli" enemy, supported by the American tyrant, wagered on eliminating Hezbollah, its Islamic Resistance, and the public united with the Resistance, dignity, and honor. It left no method, crime, conspiracy, or path unused, yet it has failed from the beginning of the “Uli al-Ba’as” battle on September 23, 2024, until now. The enemy'…
❤6
Why did the authority become so rigid? If a ceasefire comes through any mediator, we should accept it, and no one will negotiate Lebanon’s terms for a solution except Lebanon. Then came the bloody black Wednesday, with "israeli" aggression against Beirut and all of Lebanon with 200 airstrikes within ten minutes, more than 300 civilian martyrs, and more than 1,200 wounded, while the "israeli" enemy justified its actio…
❤9
On the 2nd of March, 2026, the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon decided to respond to hundreds of "israeli" aggressions committed against Lebanon and its people for 15 months. The "israeli" enemy continued its aggression, and Hezbollah was accused of "starting a war" that had never ended to begin with. After 46 days, a so-called truce was announced by the United States as a result of Iranian pressure, where Iran refuse…
❤11
Statement issued by Hezbollah: Today, the criminal Zionist enemy’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, claimed that “Hezbollah is the one undermining the ceasefire,” and that the enemy has a right to “freedom of action” in Lebanon “in accordance with the agreement with the United States and Lebanon.” Hezbollah condemns Netanyahu’s remarks and strongly warns of their grave danger, particularly in terms of attempting …
❤5
A ceasefire means a complete halt to all hostile actions. Since we do not trust this enemy, the Resistance fighters will remain in the battlefield with their fingers on the trigger, responding to violations of aggression accordingly. A ceasefire cannot be one-sided, applied by the Resistance alone; it must be observed by both parties. We will not accept a repetition of fifteen months of patience in the face of "israe…
❤20
Statement issued by the Secretary-General of Hezbollah, Sheikh Naim Kassem: The battlefield has proven to be the decisive authority, and successful politics is that which benefits from its outcomes as a source of strength to compel the "israeli" enemy to submit, in order to secure the rights of Lebanon and its citizens to their land and sovereignty, within a framework of cooperative national integration that closes …
❤9
Statement issued by Hezbollah: Hezbollah denies any connection to the incident that occurred with the UNIFIL forces in the Ghandourieh–Bent Jbeil area, and calls for caution in assigning judgments and responsibilities regarding the incident until the investigations by the Lebanese Army are completed and the full circumstances of the incident are clarified. Hezbollah also stresses the continuation of cooperation bet…
💯7❤1👍1
Deputy head of Hezbollah's Political Council, Mahmoud Qamati: • We condemn the blatant official ingratitude that falls outside the bounds of diplomacy. • The state is running and rushing toward humiliation and disgrace, and toward surrendering sovereignty step by step, instead of holding on to its strongest cards. • The President of the Republic thanked the killer and criminal, and did not thank the one who saved …
❤5👏3💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @political_aya_tweetbank. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@political_aya__ (tweet bank)” (@political_aya_tweetbank), 1,307 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/political_aya_tweetbank.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.