ТРЕНЕР ФРИЛАНСЕРОВ pinned «📈 Я ушел в арбитраж крипты и заработал первый лям уже через два месяца. Как? Рассказываю в конце поста … Охх, давно мы с вами здесь не общались… Я долгое время работал с продажами, обучал ребят и помогал фрилансерам зарабатывать больше, но, я устал. …»

Channel
ТРЕНЕР ФРИЛАНСЕРОВ
@polishuk_channel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
197subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001184556146 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @polishuk_channel |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/polishuk_channel |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 11:59 | 197 | -3 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 200 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 197 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 196 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 196 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 28 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
228 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 209 | 91.7% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 5.70% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2022 to 23 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📈 Я ушел в арбитраж крипты и заработал первый лям уже через два месяца. Как? Рассказываю в конце поста … Охх, давно мы с вами здесь не общались… Я долгое время работал с продажами, обучал ребят и помогал фрилансерам зарабатывать больше, но, я устал. Не хотел этим заниматься больше, а если я не хочу что-то делать — я не делаю. Это мое правило 🏄🏻♂️ … Начал искать новую нишу. Увидел арбитраж — он был на жестком …
👍4
Signed Михаил Полищук
Пока я тут немного отсутствую в канале, закину небольшую затравочку 😄 Приходишь учиться ко мне, получаешь инструкции, получаешь заявки на услуги —> продаёшь и зарабатываешь деньги. Работаем, друзья ✊🏻
🔥15
Signed Михаил Полищук
💎 Сейчас я и моя команда начинаем набор в предзапись на наставничество по росту заработка для фрилансеров. 10 поток. Уже 60+ человек учеников, более 20 кейсов с ростом в доходе в 3-4 раза за счет системы стабильного привлечения клиентов и правильных продаж. Старт в 20х числах июня, за поток я беру всего 6-8 человек, каждый проходит собеседование. 🧐 Зачем? Мне нужны те люди, которые будут делать результат и работа…
🔥9
Signed Михаил Полищук
Вот так надо хотеть вырасти в заработке 🔥 Таких людей уважаю, есть много ребят, которые ставили себе цель попасть на наставничество по заработку для фрилансеров именно ко мне. Попадали, а потом создавали мощный результат в деньгах 💰 Почему? Потому что есть система роста в заработке для фрилансера, отработанная уже более чем на 60 человек.
🔥10
Signed Михаил Полищук
💰 Как за счёт больших чеков выйти на 120.000₽/мес? История моей ученицы Насти, которая почти год сидела на доходе 30-40.000₽/мес. Не получалось стабильно находить клиентов и продавать. Особенно на большой чек. … По итогу наставничества Настя начала продавать услуги по таргету на чеки 20-30.000₽! 💵 Что больше всего повлияло на результат? Рассказал в кейсе ученицы по ссылке: ТУТ 👈🏻
🔥9
Signed Михаил Полищук
📈 Фрилансер может расти влияя всего на два основных показателя: 1. Количество продаж/клиентов. 2. Средний чек за услугу. … То есть по сути можно расти либо через количество клиентов, либо через, так скажем, качество (стоимость услуги). Второй вариант лучше, так вы работаете меньше, а зарабатываете больше. 👾 А многие фрилансеры пытаются развиваться через количество клиентов. «Эх, вот возьму себе сейчас 10 клиент…
🔥13👍2
Signed Михаил Полищук
🤔 Что является главным ограничителем роста у фрилансера?
- Количество клиентов8%
- Средний чек14%
- Правильная ниша14%
- Все вместе81%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Михаил Полищук
В видео выше ⬆️ сказал пару слов о результатах этого опроса по росту в доходе)) Ребята, если у нас так много тех, у кого все хорошо, зачем вы в этом канале сидите? 🙃 Но, чаще всего, всё хорошо💰 и хочется ещё лучше. Это я тоже понимаю. … Сейчас ниже запущу ещё один тест, постарайся ответить на него правильно 👇🏻
👍3
Signed Михаил Полищук
Video message, posted without a caption
❤6
Signed Михаил Полищук
Тут есть те, кто стоит на одной планке в заработке на фрилансе уже более 6 месяцев?
- Я из таких 🙋🏻♂️58%
- Не я 🙅🏻♂️42%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Михаил Полищук
Друзья, хочу задать один вопрос 👇🏻
Signed Михаил Полищук
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @polishuk_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤔 Что является главным ограничителем роста у фрилансера?
- Количество клиентов8%
- Средний чек14%
- Правильная ниша14%
- Все вместе81%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Тут есть те, кто стоит на одной планке в заработке на фрилансе уже более 6 месяцев?
- Я из таких 🙋🏻♂️58%
- Не я 🙅🏻♂️42%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2022 to 23 December 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@polishuk_channel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ТРЕНЕР ФРИЛАНСЕРОВ” (@polishuk_channel), 197 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polishuk_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.