Channel
@polinamuz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,291subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001455962894 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @polinamuz |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/polinamuz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 1,291 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 1,292 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 1,288 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 1,288 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,575 |
| Reactions total | 54 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
54 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5269389547468245998 | 36 | 66.7% | |
| custom 5976429846874559466 | 17 | 31.5% | |
| custom 6043983763975707368 | 1 | 1.85% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
а вообще на сентябрь по старым ценам почти не осталось мест, за что вам огромное спасибо🥺🤍 сентябрь - пик моей загруженности + часть октября я буду в отпуске идеальное время для записи, потому что в это время стартует закрытый канал и можно записаться просто на разбор, а находки для своего гардероба найти в подписке всех жду! (особенно девочек из Питера)
custom 52693895474682459986
мои хорошие, планирую снова командировку в Питер в конце сентября (по старой цене) 15.000₽ за два часа работы (каждый доп час 5.000₽) Шопинг/Разбор гардероба поездка пока под вопросом, так как у меня еще нет запросов на Питер именно в это время🤍
custom 59764298468745594661custom 60439837639757073681
вчера забегала в reflection, у них уже пришла осень на удивление, мне подошли по длине джинсы (это чудо какое-то) у меня рост 172 и ноги непропорционально длинные юбка мини для миниатюрных девочек (не мне размер L) там внутри шортики пиджак просто мед и рубашка с подплечниками - 11/10 на новую коллекцию всегда действует мое промо pmuz
custom 526938954746824599817
я вам пост из Питера со всеми локациями собрала! Завтра выложу;) пока сижу над каналом, и я уже собрала наполнение практикума этот практикум будет последним, в нем я объединила все 3, которые были до. Вместо привычных 4/5 дней, в этот раз их 7(!) вот краткая выжимка того, что будет (мб, конечно, еще изменю что-то) день 1 найти свой стиль какой «характер» вашего стиля? Разбираемся к чему лежит душа и причем тут …
custom 597642984687455946616custom 526938954746824599813
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @polinamuz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 373,347 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“style guide | p.muz” (@polinamuz), 1,291 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polinamuz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.