Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Поле Поли | О женщинах 🤍

Channel

Поле Поли | О женщинах 🤍

@polinametelitsa98

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,830subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001765564484
TypeChannel
Username@polinametelitsa98
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/polinametelitsa98

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,8303,8783,85417 August 2026 — 3,869 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,874 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,878 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,873 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,867 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,857 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,856 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,845 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,836 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,832 subscribers19 September 2026 — 3,830 subscribers17 August 202619 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 33 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,823–3,885 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:573,830-2
15 Sept 2026, 07:013,832-4
11 Sept 2026, 18:173,836-9
6 Sept 2026, 23:183,845-11
2 Sept 2026, 09:063,856-1
30 Aug 2026, 07:023,857-10
27 Aug 2026, 17:453,867-6
24 Aug 2026, 18:073,873-5
21 Aug 2026, 07:383,878+4
18 Aug 2026, 04:423,874+5
17 Aug 2026, 16:013,869first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23m 16s
Average length
11m 38s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

663 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
36354.8%
❤‍🔥14421.7%
🔥507.54%
🙏406.03%
😍274.07%
💘152.26%
🥰91.36%
👍50.754%
😁50.754%
💯40.603%
💔10.151%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 663 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @polinametelitsa98. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC101 views20 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

А еще одна сильная триггерная тема, которая показывает нутро человека, конечно же, ДЕНЬГИ💵💰💴 Как же они сносят людям крышу. На что люди только не готовы ради них. В какие иллюзии не западают. И на эту тему я не буду разворачивать целый текст, потому что… ЗАВТРА Никита проведет закрытый семинар 💰«ФИНАНСОВЫЙ ГЕН» 💰 18 августа в 19:00 по мск. ЗАРЕГИСТРИРОВАТЬСЯ А еще мы создали классный воркбук «КОД САМОЦЕННОСТИ» -

🔥16😁4

17 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC102 views19 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Может вы встречали тех самых «проработанных» или которые уже годами ходят по психологам/коучам/тренингам… Но стоит им попасть в некомфортную ситуацию там вываливается столько 💩 Самая лучшая проверка собственной «проработанности»: отношения с родителями/родственниками, с партнером и детьми, на работе с коллегами, с обслуживающим персоналом и в нечеловеческих условиях. Вот там становится понятно ХУ ИЗ ХУ (кто есть кт

14🔥5

17 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC104 views6 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Полина, спасибо что поделилась 🙏🙏🙏 очень ценно было послушать 🙏 действительно сохранять спокойствие и человеческое лицо в тяжелых ситуациях это результат осознанности и работы над собой! И что юмор и позитив всегда помогают в этом! Благополучного разрешения Вам ситуации с жильем и хороших людей по пути 🙏❤️❤️❤️

6

17 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC276 views36 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Рассказ из закрытого эфира Вдоха о 50 часах в аэропорту с незнакомыми людьми с рейса. Десяток наблюдений и осознаний. Почему с нами это произошло? Для чего? Остались ли мужики в нашей стране? Человек в нечеловеческих условиях. Одна и та же ситуация и абсолютно разные реакции людей. Слушая этот рассказ, многие прослезились. Для тех, у кого не грузится здесь видео: https://kinescope.io/sJVsR3gms5AVvM9Ms6f55m *Прош

❤‍🔥20😍10👍5🥰1

17 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC294 views54 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Спустя 50 часов ожидания - мы наконец добрались до пункта назначения. И вчера я даже успела провести финальную 12ую практику на женском проекте «Вдох». Для меня это куда больше, чем проект или работа - это живая жизнь, где я наблюдаю за девушками и женщинами: за их реакциями, осознаниями, состояниями. И главное за изменениями 🫰🏻 Вчера я им рассказывала про эти 2 суток задержки рейса и какую целую маленькую жизнь я

52❤‍🔥2

17 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC295 views10 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Всем прекрасного, доброго понедельника. Чтобы не откладывать на потом, хотела проговорить о том, что программа ВДОХ вдохнула в меня ту самую женственность, спокойствие, гибкость, чувственность. НО, самое главное, что я более чутко стала слышать свою интуицию и принимать себя с отёками, несовершенствами и тем уникальным человеком, которым я являюсь, как и каждая из нас. Заметила, что глядя на других, у меня нет желани

10

14 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC560 views110 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

29 часов в аэропорту. За тысячи своих перелетов и десятки лет полетов такого опыта у меня еще не было. Беременная приболевшая я с мужем ждем вылета со вчерашнего дня 16:00 по мск (сейчас 20:36 по мск). Аэропорт постоянно закрывается из-за атак в Сочи. За это время нас уже ночью вывозили в гостиницу (это был гостевой дом в Адлере в условиях которых я никогда не жила… как общага….), потом вернули утром в аэропорт. В

71🙏39

10 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC784 views15 reactionsread 17 August 2026

В вопросе денег я очень доверяю своему мужу 🫂 Не потому что «мужчина должен решать финансы» и не потому что я сама ничего в этом не понимаю:)) А потому что я вижу, как Никита мыслит, принимает решения. Потому что очень легко объяснить свои денежные сложности внешним миром, кризисом, ростом цен и «ИИ уже забирает часть профессий» 🫠 18 августа в 18:00 по мск, мы проведём закрытый семинар «ФИНАНСОВЫЙ ГЕН» 🧬 Будут го

12🔥3

1 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC925 views17 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Огромная благодарность за практику ❤️🫂 это мой второй вдох и я в восторге!! Все практики просто божественно прекрасны и эффективны 🙏🏻

12❤‍🔥5

1 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC870 views58 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Вопрос любой - ответ любовь.

36🥰8😍7❤‍🔥5🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @polinametelitsa98. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Поле Поли | О женщинах 🤍” (@polinametelitsa98), 3,830 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polinametelitsa98.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.