Блять какого хера нельзя теперь пересылать соо без ника бещ према вы ебнутые
🥰8🔥4
Signed Ребузость некая

Channel
@policyconf
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,476subscribers
-99 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002272475073 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @policyconf |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/policyconf |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 04:42 | 2,476 | -11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 2,487 | -12 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 2,499 | -9 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 2,508 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:53 | 2,523 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 2,533 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 2,538 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 2,537 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 2,547 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 2,556 | -11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 2,567 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 2,569 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 2,575 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:20 | 2,575 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
208 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 98 | 47.1% | |
| 👍 | 60 | 28.8% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 5.29% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 4.33% | |
| 🥱 | 7 | 3.37% | |
| 🤪 | 5 | 2.40% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 1.92% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 1.92% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.44% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 1.44% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.962% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.481% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.481% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Блять какого хера нельзя теперь пересылать соо без ника бещ према вы ебнутые
🥰8🔥4
Signed Ребузость некая
Posted without readable text
❤3
Signed Соси обезьяна
какие итоги вы ожидаете после выборов в госдуме? я считаю что ничего не изменится, а новые люди просто замолчат ⚡️#тейк 🗞 предложка: @policytakebot
👍8👎1
Signed Соси обезьяна
всем здравствуйте. не знаю, можно ли такое публиковать, но совсем скоро, как вы знаете, пройдут выборы в парламент. это действительно важное событие для РФ. я не агитирую за конкретную партию, однако агитирую за явку в избирательный участок и проявления гражданской позиции и ответственности. эта картинка заказана мной для распространения в сети. ни в коем случае не занимайтесь не санкционированным расклеиванием ли…
❤14
Signed Соси обезьяна
Всем кто поддерживает Израиль вопрос, какое по вашему соотношение гражданских потерь к военным со стороны газы? 30% гражданских? 40%? Давайте рассмотрим данные: •IDF признает потери со стороны газы в 70к человек: https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-believes-70000-gazans-killed-in-war-as-claimed-by-hamas/ •в той же статье указано, что IDF признает, что на одного террориста приходится 2-3 смерти гражданских. В итоге мы и…
🥱7❤2👍1
Signed Соси обезьяна
Для тех, кто думает, что Зеленский реально хочет победить в войне, а не просто убивать украинцев, то объясните почему же он просто силами СБУ не собрал дитяток росиянских чиновников в странах НАТО и не взял их в заложники. Можно было бы их пытать на видео пока в стране пынякратии не закончат войну. Буржуйскиз дяток можно было бы скальповать, свежевать, распинать и так далее, но челики так не делают. Вы реально верите…
❤3💯1
Signed Соси обезьяна
че ждем прорыва к 100 друзья? мб все-таки до выборов потянут, так что отскок небольшой вниз все-таки еще возможен, но с октября чет я не верю, что мы устоим в районе 72-81 ⚡️#тейк 🗞 предложка: @policytakebot
💯4
Signed Соси обезьяна
⚡️#тейк 🗞 предложка: @policytakebot
❤12💘2
Signed Соси обезьяна
Почему? ⚡️#тейк 🗞 предложка: @policytakebot
❤13🥰1
Signed Соси обезьяна
Если почувствуете себя позором семьи, то вспомните людей, которые пишут про госдолг сша под видео с потопом в Тюмени ⚡️#тейк 🗞 предложка: @policytakebot
❤28🤪5💯4❤🔥3
Signed Соси обезьяна
охх, как же откровенно заебали левые американцы которым нужно все плохое ассоциировать с Израилем. нет, даже не с правительством, а с населением. “[…..] is spiritually Israel” “i’m from Israel and i love your videos” и все в том же духе. неужели они сами не видят, как они противоречат сами себе в убеждениях, что не нужно ненавидеть и презирать людей по определенному признаку. создается очень зловещее ощущение, что вс…
👍23👎3❤1
Signed Соси обезьяна
⚡️#тейк 🗞 предложка: @policytakebot
👍2❤1
Signed Соси обезьяна
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @policyconf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🗞⚡️POLITICAL CONFESSIONS” (@policyconf), 2,476 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/policyconf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.