4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,128–1,141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 06:05
1,129
-6
10 Aug 2026, 03:20
1,135
-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:47
1,136
-3
7 Aug 2026, 00:47
1,139
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,694 reactions across 20 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
489
28.9%
custom 5141092487720338116
385
22.7%
🔥
349
20.6%
👏
183
10.8%
👍
63
3.72%
🕊
34
2.01%
🥰
32
1.89%
🍾
27
1.59%
⚡
23
1.36%
💘
19
1.12%
🦄
16
0.945%
🐳
14
0.826%
🆒
11
0.649%
👨💻
6
0.354%
👀
5
0.295%
👎
5
0.295%
👻
5
0.295%
👾
5
0.295%
🏆
3
0.177%
💯
3
0.177%
12 further kinds
17
1.00%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,694reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2025 to 6 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
59
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 20 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
22
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @policriptoLab. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2025 to 6 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📊🔥 Confirmed Marketing Campaign for @AtomFoundation
Let's take ⬆️$Atom to the moon!
💰Whitelist | Telegram😀 | Twitter❌ | Website😀
🆓 POLICRIPTO GIVEAWAY 0.1 SOL
💎 Tasks:
+0.1 SOL 🪙 (random)
▶️ React this message + Follow Atom in X and & RT + Like this post on Twitter
▶️ React Star = Double the chance of winning
▶️ Send proof here
Draw Date: May 20th 15:00 UTC
🏆 Winner @Ernandkp
📊🔥 Confirmed Marketing Campaign for @Ultima
Let's take ⬆️$ultima to the moon!
Telegram😀 | Twitter❌ | Website😀
🆓 POLICRIPTO GIVEAWAY 0.1 SOL
💎 Tasks:
+0.1 SOL 🪙 (random)
▶️ React this message + Follow Ultima in X and & RT + Like this post on Twitter
▶️ React Star = Double the chance of winning
▶️ Send proof here
Draw Date: April 30th 15:00 UTC
🏆 Winner: @D_NTOT
📊🔥 Confirmed Marketing Campaign for @BasePerp
Let's take ⬆️$BPERP to the moon!
Telegram😀 | Twitter❌ | Website😀
🆓 POLICRIPTO GIVEAWAY 0.1 SOL
💎 Tasks:
+0.1 SOL 🪙 (random)
▶️ React this message + Follow BasePerp in X and & RT + Like this post on Twitter
▶️ React Star = Double the chance of winning
▶️ Send proof here
Draw Date: Dec 15th 15:00 UTC
🏆 Winner @g_brielz
📊🔥 Confirmed Marketing Campaign for @MiloGold
Let's take ⬆️$MLGD to the moon!
Telegram ANN 😀 |Telegram😀 | Twitter❌ | Website😀
🆓 POLICRIPTO GIVEAWAY 0.1 SOL
💎 Tasks:
+0.1 SOL 🪙 (random)
▶️ React this message + Follow MiloGold in X and & RT+ Like this post on Twitter
▶️ React Star = Double the chance of winning
▶️ Send proof here
Draw Date: Nov 30th 15:00 UTC
🏆 Winner @LitlleDark
📊🔥 Confirmed Marketing Campaign for @HyperSui
Let's take ⬆️$HypeSui to the moon!
Telegram😀 | Twitter❌ | Website😀
🆓 POLICRIPTO GIVEAWAY 0.1 SOL
💎 Tasks:
+0.1 SOL 🪙 (random)
▶️ React this message + Follow HyperSui and & RT+ Like this post on Twitter
▶️ React Star = Double the chance of winning
▶️ Send proof here
Draw Date: Nov 10th 15:00 UTC
🏆 Winner: @AddyDax88
📊🔥 Confirmed Marketing Campaign for @DeltaProtocol
Let's take ⬆️ $DLT to the moon!
🐰Buy on Pankake🐰
https://pancakeswap.finance/swap
Contract 🔶: 0x4106993E91bc2ABEaf40F56cf3B6a49b2FB194B8
Telegram😀 | Twitter❌ | Website😀 |
🆓 POLICRIPTO GIVEAWAY 0.1 SOL
💎 Tasks:
+0.1 SOL 🪙 (random)
▶️ Follow Delta Protocol and RT & React this post
▶️ React Star = Double the chance of winning
▶️ Send proof here
Draw Date: Nov 5…
📊🔥 Confirmed New Marketing Campaign for @LayerBTC
Let's take ⬆️$DeFi to the moon!
Telegram😀 | Twitter❌ | Website😀
🆓 POLICRIPTO GIVEAWAY 0.1 SOL
💎 Tasks:
+0.1 SOL 🪙 (random)
▶️ React this message + Follow $LTBTC and & RT+Like this post on Twitter
▶️ React Star = Double the chance of winning
▶️ Send proof here
Draw Date: Oct 25th 15:00 UTC
🏆 Winner: @msbreewwwc
📊🔥 Confirmed New Marketing Campaign for @DeFi
Let's take ⬆️$DeFi to the moon!
Telegram😀 | Twitter❌ | Website😀
🆓 POLICRIPTO GIVEAWAY 0.1 SOL
💎 Tasks:
+0.1 SOL 🪙 (random)
▶️ React this message & RT this post on Twitter
▶️ React Star = Double the chance of winning
▶️ Send proof here
Draw Date: Oct 16th 15:00 UTC
🏆 Winner: @RobenBrandt
📊🔥 Confirmed Marketing Campaign for @snappyapp now in Weex Exchange
Let's take ⬆️ $SNAP to the moon!
💰Buy PIX or CRIPTO:
https://criptonopix.app.br/SNAP
Telegram😀 | Twitter❌ | TikTok✅ | Website😀 | DApp🛡
🆓 POLICRIPTO GIVEAWAY 0.2 SOL
💎 Tasks:
+0.1 SOL 🪙 (random)
▶️ React this Post
▶️Join Group + Send /Snappy_Listing_in_Weex_And_go_to_the_Moon in group telegram
+0.1 SOL 🪙 (random)
▶️ Follow Victor Lacorte and R…
📊🔥 Confirmed Marketing Campaign for @Verem
Let's take ⬆️ $VEREM to the moon!
Contract 🔶: 0x550da9AC3e1CfaE9bAf7AF637d5fF6E0455198EB
Telegram😀 | Twitter❌ | Website😀 | RWA 🛡
🆓 POLICRIPTO GIVEAWAY 0.1 SOL
💎 Tasks:
+0.1 SOL 🪙 (random)
▶️ React this Post
▶️Join Group + Send /VEREM_is_confirmed_new_listing_Soon 5x or more in Telegram Group
▶️ React Star = Double the chance of winning
Draw Date: Sept 30th 13:00 UTC
…
🔥82❤28👏6custom 51410924877203381164💯2🕊2🍾1🏆1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @policriptoLab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 266,693 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
14
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
14
vacant every time we have ever looked
@policriptoLab named 14 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@snappyapp named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@atomfoundation named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@aurafarming_portal named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@chaddie66 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@deltaprotocol named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@john_aparty named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@leadarmy256 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@milogold named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@musbal2 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@refundyousol named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@robenbrandt named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@sarahkate811 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@addydax88 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@verem named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“POLICRIPTO - LAB | Partners | Projects | Calls” (@policriptoLab), 1,129 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/policriptoLab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.