Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПОЛИПСИХИАТРИЯ

Channel

ПОЛИПСИХИАТРИЯ

@poli_psychiatris

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,258subscribers

+83 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001573424666
TypeChannel
Username@poli_psychiatris
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/poli_psychiatris

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,1742,2582,2166 August 2026 — 2,175 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,174 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,181 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,182 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,180 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,183 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,188 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,191 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,227 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,246 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,255 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,249 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,258 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net +83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,161–2,271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:382,258+9
14 Sept 2026, 06:402,249-6
5 Sept 2026, 01:202,255+9
1 Sept 2026, 17:482,246+19
29 Aug 2026, 12:072,227+36
26 Aug 2026, 06:032,191+3
23 Aug 2026, 10:392,188+5
19 Aug 2026, 23:222,183+3
16 Aug 2026, 18:282,180-2
13 Aug 2026, 03:282,182+1
10 Aug 2026, 11:462,181+7
7 Aug 2026, 08:012,174-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:502,175first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 30 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8760.4%
🔥2718.8%
👍1611.1%
👏32.08%
😭32.08%
🥰32.08%
💯21.39%
😁21.39%
🤗10.694%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @poli_psychiatris. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 April 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC280 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

🔉СТАВКИ НА СПОРТ! 🔉 🟠 Что сегодня психиатрия называет лудоманией? 🟠 По каким признакам отличить зависимость от эпизодической игры? 🟠 Почему размер проигрыша сам по себе ничего не говорит о диагнозе? 🟠Что такое «погоня за проигрышем» и потеря контроля? 🟠 Как отличить лудоманию от рискованного поведения во время гипомании или мании? Вот такие вопросики по мотивам приема и одного клинического случая. А как часто вам

🔥119😭3

6 Jul 2026, 13:39 UTC519 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

В ПОИСКАХ ТОГО САМОГО Небольшая история и выводы почему бесконечная и частая смена врачей, в поисках «того самого специалиста» или «той самой схемы терапии» может быть вредна. Можно делиться своим опытом и мнением в комментариях, понимаю, что может у кого-то опыт иной и выводы соответствующие. PS: меня так давно не было тут, что я запуталась сначала как истории выкладывать, а теперь как делать нормальный аудио-под

👍5👏32

6 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC468 views24 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что реально помогает двигаться ближе к здоровью? 1️⃣ Основа стабильного состояния - это непрерывность лечения. Если вы можете порекомендовать сестре специалиста, например которого посоветовали ваши знакомые, то стоит предложить такой вариант. Большая проблема для людей с БАР это отсутствие стабильного лечения у одного специалиста, знающего полную картину и работающего поэтапно для подбора эффективной терапии дающей

13🔥6👍4🤗1

6 Jul 2026, 04:57 UTC405 views24 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ОНА НЕ ХОЧЕТ РАБОТАТЬ, НАХОДИТСЯ В ЗАВИСИМЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЯХ И МЕНЯЕТ ПАРТНЕРОВ Начинаю отвечать на вопросы из ДокПсиФеста, и этот будет первым. Сразу оговорюсь: я могу дать общую информацию и рекомендации, но не могу поставить диагноз или заменить лечащего психиатра и терапевта И ещё важное, меня очень трогает и впечатляет то, что вы ищете, как помочь, это уже само по себе много значит. Начну с одного различения, потом

16🔥4👍2💯2

22 Jun 2026, 08:26 UTC501 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Это то самое «искусство» о котором говорит, Валерий Павлович. 🙈🩵

10🥰3

22 Jun 2026, 08:16 UTC473 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Это мы с Валерой готовились утром к лекции, сейчас уже работать пошли 😂 А присоедениться к ДОКПСИФЕСТУ РЕКОМЕНДУЮ НАСТОЯТЕДЬНО!

7🔥2

22 Jun 2026, 08:15 UTC426 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

8😁2

7 Jun 2026, 09:13 UTC626 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mindsetmoscow

😊 Вебинар «Тело помнит роды» начнётся через 30 минут — в 12:00. На эфире специалисты поговорят о темах, с которыми сталкиваются многие женщины после родов: от боли и телесного дискомфорта до самокритики, тревоги и непринятия собственного тела. 🔮Обсудим: ➖восстановление тазового дна, диастаз, интимное здоровье и причины боли после родов; ➖хроническую боль, телесное напряжение и внутреннего критика; ➖связь самокритик

6

7 Jun 2026, 09:13 UTC533 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @psiholog_tanyaVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

2

19 May 2026, 19:14 UTC656 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mindsetmoscowPhoto

ВЕБИНАР: «Тело помнит роды» 🍐 📎[Анкета предзаписи] После родов женщина часто сталкивается не только с физическим восстановлением, но и с непростыми переживаниями, вызванными телесными изменениями. Перемены во внешности и весе, боль, телесный дискомфорт, снижение либидо – всё это может влиять на самоощущение, усиливать тревогу, стыд и самокритику. На вебинаре мы поговорим о двух основных проблемах: ➖изменение внеш

4🔥2

30 Apr 2026, 09:50 UTC616 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mindsetmoscowPhoto

Группа по работе с социальной тревогой Вы готовитесь к разговору заранее и прокручиваете его потом снова и снова. Замечаете, что теряете мысль, краснеете, говорите «да», когда хотите сказать «нет». Вы отказываетесь от возможностей — новой работы, знакомств, выступлений — не потому что не хотите, а потому что страшно. Социальная тревога умеет убеждать, что вы не справитесь, что вас осудят и что лучше не рисковать. Н

5👍2

30 Apr 2026, 09:49 UTC522 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Апрель выдался сложным, но преодолевая трудности пора возвращаться к будням и делам. Я задолжала вам пост про обезьянку и одновременно обзавелась своей. Завтра будет пост. А сегодня хочу порекомендовать одну группу. В комментариях меня недавно спросили, что можно почитать о социальной тревоге для самостоятельного изучения. И я задумалась, а что? В голову пришла лишь глава из книги Роберта Лихи «Свобода от тревоги»

5👍3🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @poli_psychiatris. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПОЛИПСИХИАТРИЯ” (@poli_psychiatris), 2,258 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poli_psychiatris.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.