Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⋆ 𝐏𝐎𝐈𝐒𝐎𝐍 ⋆

Channel

⋆ 𝐏𝐎𝐈𝐒𝐎𝐍 ⋆

@poiissonss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

159subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002093329720
TypeChannel
Username@poiissonss
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/poiissonss

Growth

15916116010 Aug 2026, 07:46 — 161 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 00:01 — 159 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 07:4611 Aug 2026, 00:01
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 159–161 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 00:01159-2
10 Aug 2026, 07:46161first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

102 reactions across 8 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52604182326652600431615.7%
custom 52355016241426183111312.7%
custom 52607195160311396811211.8%
custom 528952129184021143398.82%
custom 538901428656146217198.82%
custom 546763893713457817898.82%
custom 546776569020942039176.86%
custom 523574094401531480965.88%
custom 537076206712286276454.90%
custom 539345295057827943643.92%
custom 533903138990590134232.94%
custom 543406579625703837332.94%
custom 534137385647920709921.96%
custom 535029614423050178021.96%
custom 537969163054878178121.96%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Apr 2026, 05:06 UTC733 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52355016241426183112custom 52895212918402114332custom 53390313899059013422custom 53707620671228627642custom 53934529505782794362custom 54677656902094203912

Signed 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗢𝗠⁶⁹

23 Mar 2026, 11:55 UTC680 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52607195160311396813custom 52895212918402114333custom 53890142865614621713custom 52355016241426183112custom 52604182326652600432

Signed 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗢𝗠⁶⁹

23 Mar 2026, 11:55 UTC653 viewsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗢𝗠⁶⁹

19 Feb 2026, 00:33 UTC551 viewsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗢𝗠⁶⁹

19 Feb 2026, 00:33 UTC482 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Всё именно так и было

custom 52355016241426183112custom 52357409440153148092custom 52604182326652600431custom 53890142865614621711custom 54676389371345781781

Signed 𝗩𝗘𝗡𝗢𝗠⁶⁹

19 Feb 2026, 00:32 UTC717 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 52607195160311396814custom 52355016241426183112custom 52604182326652600432custom 53890142865614621712custom 54677656902094203912custom 52357409440153148091custom 52895212918402114331custom 53934529505782794361

30 Jan 2026, 19:30 UTC389 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🤩 Обои подождут. 🤩 Их любовь в этот раз была другой. Не той дикой, неистовой схваткой у стены. Это было осознанное, медленное, но от того не менее страстное завоевание. Томирис повернул Дилана лицом к стене, к их «историческому» месту, и вошёл в него сзади, плотно прижимая всем телом. Каждое движение было глубоким, властным, утверждающим. Он не просто занимался с ним любовью. Он отмечал его. Снова и снова. Зная, что

custom 54676389371345781784custom 54340657962570383733custom 52355016241426183111custom 52357409440153148091custom 52604182326652600431custom 53413738564792070991custom 53502961442305017801custom 53707620671228627641

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @poiissonss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jan 2026, 18:13 UTCAnonymous Poll38 voters

Скинуть вторую часть?

  1. Конечно!!!61%
  2. Хватит мне на сегодня интернета... Ладно, давай21%
  3. Нееет18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 432,120 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⋆ 𝐏𝐎𝐈𝐒𝐎𝐍 ⋆” (@poiissonss), 159 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poiissonss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.