she no longer counts her tears even tragedies become routine when they overstay
❤32😢3👀2

Channel
@poetryandverse
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,573subscribers
+56 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002165342741 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @poetryandverse |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/poetryandverse |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 2,573 | +6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 2,567 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 2,569 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 2,572 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:12 | 2,570 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 2,574 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 2,568 | +7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 2,561 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 2,557 | +5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 2,552 | +10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:39 | 2,542 | +18 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:26 | 2,524 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 2,517 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 2,517 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
517 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 433 | 83.8% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 3.87% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 1.93% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 1.74% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 1.55% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 1.16% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 1.16% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 0.967% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 0.58% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.387% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.387% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.193% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.193% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.193% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.193% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 517 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
she no longer counts her tears even tragedies become routine when they overstay
❤32😢3👀2
There comes a point where you stop asking, “Who am I becoming?” and begin asking, “How long have I been pretending this wasn’t always me?” Some discoveries don’t illuminate. They convict….convict you to the core.
❤23👏4
Send me an anonymous message or gift:
❤7
Let’s listen what you guys have to say 🗣️ reviews,criticism,suggestions,your stories,your poems,what’s going in your life,head blah blah
🤩6🎉2
and like millions of others, i dream of being loved without condition, yet i hand the world nothing but conditions before it can reach me !!
❤21💔5🔥2
A letter to her That will never fly to her address. But it just flew from my heart Maybe i fell in love Maybe only i fell in love. And you You never felt the same way. The charm i saw in your eyes I thought it was reflection Of your love. But now Maybe I know It wasnt. And that makes me fall even harder. All those butterflies you fed me with. It wasnt your love It was just. You. Maybe i fell in love And tried to d…
❤16👏2🔥1
2:44 am If, decades from now, we accidentally become strangers introducing ourselves for the first time, I hope you won’t apologize for not recognizing me. How could you? You never met the version of me that loved you. He existed only after midnight, filling page after page with your name carefully omitted, terrified that ink might disclose what silence had protected for years. And perhaps that is the final act …
❤26👏4🕊1😱1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤19
They called me “too sensitive” while turning my heart into a battlefield, then acted surprised when I came home covered in bruises and blemishes.
❤22🫡3🔥1
“IT’S NOT YOU, IT’S ME” ______________________________ I literally used to crack up at people who ended things with, “It’s not you, it’s me.” It sounded lazy…..like a sentence stitched together because they were too terrified to tell the truth. I’d think, What does that even mean? If it’s you, then say it’s you. If it’s me, then explain yourself as simple as that. But you know life has this cruel habit of dragging …
❤21🔥7💔4
“darkness” did not find me. it recognized its own.
❤24🔥1
The nation was never theirs to own (politicians’). Only history is patient enough to distinguish its lovers from its loudest advertisers.
❤30🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @poetryandverse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Accidental Poet” (@poetryandverse), 2,573 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poetryandverse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.