Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 42 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 114–117 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 15:41
114
-1
9 Sept 2026, 17:00
115
-1
16 Aug 2026, 04:28
116
-1
9 Aug 2026, 05:01
117
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:11
117
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 02s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
36 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
15
41.7%
🔥
11
30.6%
👍
5
13.9%
👏
2
5.56%
😍
2
5.56%
🥰
1
2.78%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Аквамарин цвета ледника
Эдвардианская подвеска в форме банта, начало XX века.
В центре украшения - грушевидный аквамарин весом 22 карата. Его редкий холодный оттенок напоминает голубой лёд, внутри которого застыл свет.
Камень обрамляет изящный бант, вручную выполненный из платины на основе 18-каратного золота. Общий вес бриллиантов составляет 0,50 карата.
Ювелирное искусство эдвардианской эпохи ценило лёгкость, т…
88 карат света: редчайшее колье Bulgari
Около 1935 года.
Это впечатляющее бриллиантовое колье Bulgari относится к эпохе расцвета ар-деко.
В его центре - пятнадцать бриллиантов кушоновидной огранки, постепенно увеличивающихся в размере по направлению к передней части украшения. Они чередуются с более мелкими бриллиантами аналогичной огранки, установленными на звеньях с багетными камнями. Композицию дополняют брилли…
«Три рыбы» Рене Лалика
Брошь Trois Motifs Poissons, около 1900 года.
Рене Лалик создал украшение, в котором три зелёные стеклянные рыбы словно движутся в прозрачной воде. Композицию обрамляет рама из 18-каратного золота и бриллиантов.
Размер броши - 9,2 сантиметра.
Лалик изменил само представление о ювелирном искусстве. Для него ценность украшения определялась не стоимостью материалов, а силой художественного обр…
Драгоценное насекомое конца XIX века
Эта необычная подвеска в форме насекомого выполнена из цельного жёлтого золота 14 карат.
На груди сверкает овальный опал-кабошон. При каждом движении в нём вспыхивают голубые, зелёные и розоватые оттенки. Крылья созданы из натурального блистерного жемчуга из Миссисипи, а брюшко украшено вертикальным рядом из пяти мелких жемчужин.
Размер подвески - около 3 × 1,9 сантиметра. Вес …
Тиара, которая превращалась в созвездие брошей
Англия, около 1870 года.
Эта викторианская тиара украшена бриллиантовыми звёздами и синей эмалью. Но самое интересное скрывается в её конструкции: звёзды можно было снять с основания и носить отдельно как броши.
Трансформируемые украшения были особенно популярны в XIX веке. Драгоценность должна была не только впечатлять, но и соответствовать разным обстоятельствам. Дн…
Колье «tutti frutti» от Cartier, 1936 год.
Создано под влиянием индийского стиля по заказу Дейзи Феллоуз - иконы стиля и наследницы компании «Зингер», производителя швейных машин.
КОЛЬЦО С ЭМАЛЬЮ В СТИЛЕ АР-НУВО
Москва, 1908–1917
Изучаем историю моды. Смотрите, какое восхитительное украшение!
Выполнено из зелёного золота; центральный элемент - бриллиант старой европейской огранки цвета шампанского (приблизительно 0,85 карата) в обрамлении листьев из эмали plique-à-jour с жемчужным акцентом. Шинка кольца оформлена в виде стилизованной ветви дерева.
(Фотография любезно предоставлена: romanovrus…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @poesiabrand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Poesia Натальи Коныховой - бренд украшений ручной работы” (@poesiabrand), 114 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poesiabrand.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.