Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Подслушано HUUE

Channel

Подслушано HUUE

@podslurggu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,570subscribers

+332 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002232333395
TypeChannel
Username@podslurggu
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/podslurggu

Growth

3,2383,5703,4046 August 2026 — 3,238 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,238 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,244 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,429 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,506 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,570 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net +332. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,188–3,620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 09:073,570+64
13 Aug 2026, 05:073,506+77
10 Aug 2026, 03:503,429+185
7 Aug 2026, 09:173,244+6
6 Aug 2026, 22:453,238no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:373,238first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.4%
avg views ÷ 3,570 subscribers
Avg views / post
872
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held32 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total27,904
Reactions total405
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

405 reactions across 22 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13533.3%
👎7418.3%
😁389.38%
👀338.15%
💯286.91%
🖕184.44%
🎉133.21%
💘122.96%
💋102.47%
👍92.22%
🍓71.73%
😢71.73%
💩61.48%
🔥61.48%
🤣51.23%
😭10.247%
🤡10.247%
🤮10.247%
🥰10.247%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 405reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC752 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

вопрос к челам которые переводились с платки на бюджет вы где то на сайте приказ видите??

🍓7

7 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC756 viewsread 7 August 2026

Какова вероятность, что после заключения договора меня оставят в покое и просто зачислят для равновесия вселенской несправедливости? Я хочу уехать в глушь, но приходится мониторить списки

7 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC765 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ребят, кто знает про бакалавриат факультет истории театра и кино и факультет археологии в вузе? 1. Качество преподавания 2. Контингент, потому что знакомые говорят, что например на ф-т истории кино и театра поступают ребята с низкими баллами, неохотно учащиеся Хочу разузнать чуть побольше об обоих факультетах

💩4

7 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC701 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

абитуриенты сколько у вас айкью скажите пожалуйста. Идите сайты чекайте на списки, а не в чатах сидите идиоты бляяяя. Квотникам списки заливали в 8-9 часов вечера, уведомление сразу пришло на гос услуги, расслабьте свои жопы ☹️☹️☹️ Ненадо вам в чатах сидеть и всему верить, идите воздухом подышите

9👎3😁1

7 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC677 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/podslurggu/1896 с писки вышло 😂

🤣5

7 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC670 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

что делать если чувствуешь что на твоем направлении будет 3 человека?

9

7 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC677 viewsread 7 August 2026

подскажите, а сначала создают чат с поступившими бюджетниками на направления и потом добавляют платников? или всех разом, когда будут известны результаты у платки

7 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC687 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ищу ребят из РГГУ которые пойдут на Фурмаркет 15 августа, окликнитесь в комментариях, а то мой хэндлер не сможет пойти и мне нужен человек, который поможет с перевозкой сьюта (фулл). С меня билет!!!!

7 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC746 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026

заранее, на всякий случай: тимлидеры и прочие ебалаи (ботаны в очках) будут рассказывать вам, что на посвяте вас изнасилуют/ограбят/накачают наркотиками — скажем один раз. ни одной такой хуйни у нас на посвяте не было, посвяты максимально цивильные, мы как орги следим за комфортом вообще всех гостей, как пацанов, так и девчонок. тебя кто-то доебывает? объясним человеку, что так делать не надо. не поймет? выведем. ч

38💋10💘7💩1

7 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC931 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026

дорогие друзья, пишут админы скоро заанонсим ебейший посвят на 100 человек, это мероприятие мы будем проводить уже третий год подряд. поэтому заранее освобождайте себе числа в конце сентября. вход будет СТРОГО 18+ ждите анонс!

38👎11😢4😁1

7 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC≈1,040 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ну че кого зачислили

🖕18🎉13👀42😁1

7 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈1,310 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Списки вышли!

👎36👍9🔥6👀1💯1🤡1😁1😭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @podslurggu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 356,047 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Подслушано HUUE” (@podslurggu), 3,570 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podslurggu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.