Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
ПОДСЛУШАНО СТУДИИ
@podlyshanostudioorig
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
146subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 25 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004497818320 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @podlyshanostudioorig |
| First recorded | 25 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/podlyshanostudioorig |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 146 | no change |
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:47 | 146 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 24 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 68.1%
- avg views ÷ 146 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 99.4
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 6.29%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (24 September 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,292 |
| Reactions total | 32 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 01:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 28
- Links
- 108
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
32 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 9 | 28.1% | |
| 😐 | 7 | 21.9% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 21.9% | |
| 🤨 | 4 | 12.5% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 9.38% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🤩🤩💎 @. ꪀew 𑜀̤essage 🤩блять, как же меня заебали бессмысленные щп в кбаных студиях. и максимальное комментирование всего нахуй что происходит в жизни у админов, вплоть до того, что они делают из тгк флуд. и окей, если бы это был вопрос-ответ, но зачем мне ваше расписание и домашнее задание по окружающему миру 🤩🤩🤩🦢 anσnbot .
🤩🤩💎 @. ꪀew 𑜀̤essage 🤩а теперь поднимем РЕАЛЬНО фактовую и важную тему. я уверена что многие из вас хотели высказаться на эту тему, поэтому выскажусь за всех. меня уже заебали владельцы которые берут голоса своих любимых персов. ладно, если голос к ним подходит, НО НЕТ. они просто берут голоса своих любимых персонажей, хотя голос к ним у них ВООБЩЕ не подходит. 🤩🤩🤩🦢 anσnbot .
🤝2
🤩🤩💎 @. ꪀew 𑜀̤essage 🤩Почему никто не говорит про студию "Teyvat Voices"? Это же просто ужас какой-то, во первых влд как будто набирает админов и совладельцев из воздуха, ставя каких-то рандомных людей которые ничего не делают?🤐 Влд ноет из за каждой отписки типо : "ЫЫЫЫ МИНУС 1 ПОДПИСЧИК ЫЫЫ" Видео вообще не выходят А ролик с Водяницей, вы вообще слышали вокал актера озвучки?!! актера как будто на рандом взяли…
😐7🤨3
🤩🤩💎 @. ꪀew 𑜀̤essage 🤩мне оченб жалко владельцу мелоди.. какие же подонки добили ее за считанные дни. я оченб хочу ее обнять 🤩🤩🤩🦢 anσnbot .
😢9🤝4❤3
🤩🤩💎 @. ꪀew 𑜀̤essage 🤩Итак, давайте в последний раз Слово «студия» (от итальянского studio) имеет несколько значений, связанных с творчеством, обучением и производством. 1. Мастерская художника или скульптора, помещение, где художник работает над своими произведениями 2. Специальное помещение для ведения радио, и телепередач, звукозаписи, фото, и киносъёмок. Например, телевизионная студия или студия фирмы грамзапи…
🤩🤩💎 @. ꪀew 𑜀̤essage 🤩Бля, ваще не похоже, да? А особенно посмотрите на текст, который я обвёл(а), не похоже? КОНЕЧНО ПОХОЖЕ, там просто точь в точь текст...Ну типо это нормис? Да, может вы не знали что есть такая студия, но почему главный персонаж там ТОЖЕ Люцифер? Не похоже на совпадение. И да, если вы придумали это первее почему не создали студию сразу? Популярная Robir точно создана не недавно, а довольно долго…
🤩🤩💎 @. ꪀew 𑜀̤essage 🤩Здравствуйте, А вот с вами святая женщина!!! Которая услышала, что новая «абсолютно самостоятельно придуманная» студия скопировала название студии у студии « https://t.me/roobiss ». Влд этой новой студии, который сразу, как я и некоторые люди пишут, что название студии скопировано, начал переходить на семью и маты, говоря что название придумал сам. Когда я попросила поменять название, мне отка…
🤩🤩💎 @. ꪀew 𑜀̤essage 🤩Хочу рассказать о студии которая взяла чужое название студии которая популярная и создана раньше. На это указывают так же даты. Буквально то же название но другое оформление. Взять у популярной студии название а потом выдавать что ты сам придумал это название гадко. Да и просто брать чужие посты/названия это не приемлемо. Я против этого... 🤩🤩🤩🦢 anσnbot .
🤩🤩💎 @. ꪀew 𑜀̤essage 🤩Моё мнение о моём влд @ccaesar228 она тупая, дура она не даёт нам нормально работы, и кто уже она не верит какой то девчонки что она сказала что это экспериментальная студия, ну нет @ccaesar228 ДУРА ТУПАЯ, и скажу по секрету она мне сказала что это её BloodMoon studio создала чтобы ей верили и она мошенница 🤩🤩🤩🦢 anσnbot .
🤩🤩💎 @. ꪀew 𑜀̤essage 🤩В одной студии я выцграла кастинг на серу, (вроде называлась bananako studio не помню точного названия) И когда я чистила тг, случайно удалила чаты актеров озвучки, не заметив этого, и вместо того чтобы написать мне, что случилось и почему я вышла, мне нашли замену!!!!! Я спрашиваю в коммах, а почему мне ничего не сказали и взяли на мою роль другого человека? На что мне ответили "вы просто выш…
🤩🤩💎 @. ꪀew 𑜀̤essage 🤩А поч эта @MyLittlk persona скопировала название ориг студии робир. Её студия https://t.me/roBirrr0 Эт что зайка 🤩🤩🤩🦢 anσnbot .
🤝1🤨1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @podlyshanostudioorig. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@podlyshanostudioorig named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 25 September 2026 – 25 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПОДСЛУШАНО СТУДИИ” (@podlyshanostudioorig), 146 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podlyshanostudioorig.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.