Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Подлинник

@podlinnik999

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001364777132
TypeChannel
Username@podlinnik999
DescriptionДоподлинно о неизвестном
Created16 January 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/podlinnik999

Growth

207 August 2026 — 20 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–21 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 15:1720no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:5820first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 24 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
117
Videos
45
Links
118

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 01s
Average length
4m 01s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2025 to 5 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Mar 2026, 21:14 UTC6 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Metamorphosis_dieiPhoto

Рональд Рейган Уильям Кейси Оливер Норт (смотрим,как обычно, в обратной последовательности) Интересно… когда и кто именно вспомнит про «Ирангейт». По моему, самое время окунуться в анналы истории. Не самой давней, между прочим, не самой давней.) Про прекрасные годы «дружбы» Америки и Ирана.)) Кого первыми всколыхнут волны памяти? Про Ронни, про Вилли, про Оливера… Про зенитные комплексы в обмен на заложников, про н

16 Aug 2025, 09:39 UTC586 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Сашеньке Невзорову, записному метафизику и пристежной бляди всего и вся, пламенный привет из Анкориджа!) Встреча лидеров состоялась!

16 Aug 2025, 08:53 UTCviews —

Подлинник pinned «Не знаю, насколько верны данные инсайдеров, но вероятное назначение Александра Ивановича станет одним из самых годных ходов Верховного!»

16 Aug 2025, 08:50 UTC503 viewsread 11 August 2026

Не знаю, насколько верны данные инсайдеров, но вероятное назначение Александра Ивановича станет одним из самых годных ходов Верховного!

22 Jun 2025, 06:21 UTC656 viewsread 11 August 2026

Пока все чисто,слава богу! https://t.me/irna_1313/346566

10 Jun 2025, 14:01 UTC282 viewsread 11 August 2026

Экономной экономики вам в вечеру. Если ошибаюсь, поправьте меня. В Осетии, в обозримом прошлом, никаких девелоперских съездов и конгрессов не было! Так, чтобы мощно, с телевизионщиками, с глубоким анализом спроса, предложения и «прибавочной стоимости»!)

10 Jun 2025, 14:01 UTC56 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @economismrussia

Добиваем тему недвижки. ЦБ счел продажу новостроек в рассрочку угрозой для кредитоспособности застройщиков. Небезосновательно, но есть несколько "но". 1. Первый взнос там очень приличный. На рынке нет кейсов, когда рассрочку одобряют с нулевым или оконулевым первоначальным взносом. Как правило, он не меньше 50%, а у ЛСР, если верить недавнему интервью его босса, вообще 70%. Так что риски здесь все-таки преувеличены

1

4 Jun 2025, 09:52 UTC170 viewsread 11 August 2026

Вот эта психоневрологическая субстанция и была задержана-похищена, как уверяют, чеченскими силовиками. Здесь необходима работа врачей, убеждён в этом. Кому пришло в голову устраивать силовой флешмоб, пёс его знает. Плохая работа, непрофессиональная! В центре Москвы, под софиты и камеры гостей и зевак. За подобную оперативную работу можно и неполное служебное схлопотать. Это не говоря о правовых и процессуальных аспе

1 Jun 2025, 15:53 UTC314 viewsread 11 August 2026

Не верю в стамбульские рауты. Ни на йоту не верю! Америки, конечно, не открыл. И сегодняшняя попытка атаковать центры стратегической авиации РФ совершенно точно увеличивает шансы начала новой фазы и новой формы противостояния. Не думаю, что Верховный приостановит стамбульские встречи, но переформатирование будет точно. И очень жесткое.

24 May 2025, 18:27 UTC396 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Михаилу Александровичу 120. Спасибо за казацкую сагу! Спасибо за «Тихий Дон»!

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @podlinnik999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Подлинник” (@podlinnik999), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podlinnik999.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.