📈GRAM взлетает на луну 📞Павел Дуров выложил еще один пост, в котором заявил, что за последние 2 дня активировалось более 1 млн кошельков GRAM! 🤩🤩 @PodarkiTG 🤑GRAM ⭐️ Купить дешевые звезды
🎃1custom 57759106786614349971custom 58664009065341946661

Channel
@podarkitg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
8,642subscribers
+4,446 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002946031867 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @podarkitg |
| Description | Всё о новых NFT подарках в Telegram: новости, когда выйдут? Дата выхода новых ТГ подарков Сотрудничество: @MMA_METR |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/podarkitg |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 18:09 | 8,642 | -84 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:46 | 8,726 | -66 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:20 | 8,792 | +123 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:25 | 8,669 | +370 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:15 | 8,299 | -36 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:47 | 8,335 | -24 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:29 | 8,359 | -29 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:58 | 8,388 | -49 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 8,437 | -74 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 8,511 | -233 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 17:40 | 8,744 | -703 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 9,447 | +880 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 8,567 | -172 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 8,739 | -171 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 8,910 | +677 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 8,233 | +1,214 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:24 | 7,019 | -75 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 7,094 | +1,566 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 5,528 | +666 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 4,862 | first reading |
75 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 75 (1 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 48,694 |
| Reactions total | 859 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 13:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,236 reactions across 69 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5866400906534194666 | 368 | 29.8% | |
| custom 5890911279870119913 | 266 | 21.5% | |
| custom 5775910678661434997 | 229 | 18.5% | |
| 🏆 | 102 | 8.25% | |
| 🎃 | 80 | 6.47% | |
| custom 5803123037398109867 | 72 | 5.83% | |
| 🔥 | 68 | 5.50% | |
| 😁 | 29 | 2.35% | |
| ⚡ | 22 | 1.78% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,313 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 17 of 41 posts held from the last 30 days (41.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📈GRAM взлетает на луну 📞Павел Дуров выложил еще один пост, в котором заявил, что за последние 2 дня активировалось более 1 млн кошельков GRAM! 🤩🤩 @PodarkiTG 🤑GRAM ⭐️ Купить дешевые звезды
🎃1custom 57759106786614349971custom 58664009065341946661
🚀Полетел грам Дурева 📞Купить GRAM можно в нашем боте @PodarkiStarsBot 🤩🤩 @PodarkiTG 🤑GRAM ⭐️ Купить дешевые звезды
custom 57759106786614349976🎃3custom 58664009065341946663
💎GRAM в ТОП-3 крипте? 🤡Павел Дуров опубликовал пост, в котором обратил внимание на рост TON на 7% на фоне сильного падения всего крипторынка 🤙Более того, Дуров заявил, что однажды GRAM войдет в ТОП-3 криптовалют по версии CoinMarketCap 🤩🤩 @PodarkiTG 🤑GRAM ⭐️ Купить дешевые звезды
custom 58664009065341946663🎃2custom 57759106786614349972
👮♀️Дешёвые офферы – ВСЁ 💰Больше не получится кинуть оффер в ⭐125 звёзд на дорогую Plush Pepe 🕵️♂️Скоро владелец подарка сможет сам выставлять минимальную цену оффера на свой подарок. В бета-версии уже нашли новый параметр offer_min_amount отвечающий за минимальную сумму оффера 🤩🤩 @PodarkiTG 🤑GRAM ⭐️ Купить дешевые звезды
🎃4custom 57759106786614349974custom 58664009065341946663
🍗Дешевые Telegram подарки начали расти 👍Меньше чем за сутки GRAM вырос на 6% до почти $1.1 – и вместе с этим начали расти и дешевые подарки! 🎁Флорные Telegram подарки же показали рост с $3.7 до $4.7 — почти на 27%! 🤩🤩 @PodarkiTG 🤑GRAM ⭐️ Купить дешевые звезды
🎃5custom 57759106786614349975custom 58664009065341946665
🚨Новые виды кружков в Telegram В следующем обновлении добавят возможность отправлять кружки в виде 💖сердечек, 🌟звездочек, 🐈⬛котиков, 🌸цветков, а также 👻призраков и многих других. ✔️Данная функция будет доступна только пользователям с Premium 🤩🤩 @PodarkiTG 🤑GRAM ⭐️ Купить дешевые звезды
custom 57759106786614349976🎃4custom 58664009065341946662
🚀Жаль, конечно, этого добряка 🤩🤩 @PodarkiTG 🤑GRAM ⭐️ Купить дешевые звезды
🎃6custom 58664009065341946666custom 57759106786614349975
💥Цены Telegram подарков скорректировались из-за изменений курса GRAM Большую просадку заметил в Кепках 🎁 — они сейчас торгуются за минимальную цену почти за все время 🤩🤩 @PodarkiTG 🤑GRAM ⭐️ Купить дешевые звезды
🎃4custom 57759106786614349972custom 58664009065341946661
📞Самое время закупить дешевый GRAM через нашего бота @PodarkiStarsBot 🚬Через 2 дня, 11-го ноября будет еще разблокировано грамчиков на 36млн$ 🤩🤩 @PodarkiTG 🤑GRAM ⭐️ Купить дешевые звезды
custom 57759106786614349978🎃5custom 58664009065341946665
🧻GRAM упал до 1$ бакса 🍗Теперь хоть считать удобно 🤩🤩 @PodarkiTG 🤑GRAM ⭐️ Купить дешевые звезды
custom 577591067866143499711🎃4custom 58664009065341946663
🎁Улучшение на самый дорогой подарок выйдет уже через неделю? 🗓15 ноября у Telegram подарка Airplane будет годовщина — ровно год с момента начала аукциона! 🕵️♂️Идейный аниматор допустил, что вероятность выхода улучшений для самолётика к годовщине его выпуска довольно высока 😱Так же дизайнер сообщил, что уже практически готовы 50 моделей! 💰На данный момент это самый дорогой подарок. Средняя цена на покупку самолё…
custom 57759106786614349976custom 58664009065341946664🎃3
🚨140 бесплатных Telegram подарков уже завтра разыграют в StonksGifts 🎁 30 шт. Low Riders 🎁60 шт. Pool Float 🎁40 шт. Myth Mask 💰Залетаем в раздел задания и лутаем халявные подарочки 🤩🤩 @PodarkiTG 🤑GRAM ⭐️ Купить дешевые звезды
custom 58664009065341946666🎃3custom 57759106786614349973
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @podarkitg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@podarkitg edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 2 posts on @podarkitg as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Подарки ТГ | Telegram” (@podarkitg), 8,642 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podarkitg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.