Channel
@podarkidaf1ka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
191subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002899146435 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @podarkidaf1ka |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/podarkidaf1ka |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 191 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 193 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 193 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 1 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
121 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5379850840691476775 | 48 | 39.7% | |
| custom 5449857802593901902 | 34 | 28.1% | |
| custom 5267500801240092311 | 32 | 26.4% | |
| 🍌 | 7 | 5.79% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2026 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @podarkidaf1ka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 January 2026 to 20 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Крупный розыгрыш от Муси 😘 Будет 5 победителей 🤩 1 место - Telegram Premium на 3 месяца ⭐ 2 место - Кубок 🏆 3 место - Букет 💐 4-5 место - Мишка 🧸 Условия просты: 1. Быть подписанным на канал 2. Поставить реакцию на розыгрыш(пост) 3. Нажать кнопку ниже ⬇️ Итоги по достижению 150 подписчиков в канале Лучший VPN с обходом и безлимитным трафиком
🍌4
Если кому-то нужно, то держите 🙂 Лучший VPN с обходом и без, с полным безлимитом и до 5 устройств
🍌1
Розыгрыш от Муси Будет 3 победителя 🏆 1 место - Кубок 🏆 2 место - Букет 💐 3 место - Роза 🌹 Условия просты: 1. Подписка на канал 2. Поставить реакцию на розыгрыш (пост) 3. Нажать кнопку ниже ⬇️ Итоги 17.06 в 22:00
🍌2
кстати, там розыгрышы тоже будут
custom 52675008012400923113
@teftelkis перехехал на новый тгк
custom 52675008012400923112
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 54498578025939019024custom 52675008012400923112
new gifts released 🧸 15 ⭐️ UPD: удалили нового мишку
custom 53798508406914767757custom 52675008012400923114
😄Что по новостям? 1. Новых подарков почти больше не будет; 2. Добавят функцию сжигания подарков, чтобы сократить саплай; 3. Добавят функцию передачи неулучшенных гифтов.
custom 52675008012400923117custom 54498578025939019021
Давайте, кто первые двое перейдут в бота и скинут сюда в комменты скрин "нажав старт" - кину по сердечку 💝
custom 52675008012400923113custom 53798508406914767751
что по активу?
custom 52675008012400923118custom 53798508406914767756custom 54498578025939019026
Video, posted without a caption
custom 54498578025939019026custom 53798508406914767751
😄Итак, многие спрашивают где купить звезды⭐ 😎Нашел вам бота с очень доступными ценами на звёзды и не только: - Telegram stars⭐️ - TON 💎 - Telegram Premium ✉️ Оплата как рублями (СПБ, QR) так и Криптовалютой (CryptoBot, Ton) Купить звёзды по низкой цене⭐
custom 52675008012400923113custom 54498578025939019023custom 53798508406914767752
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @podarkidaf1ka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 770,762 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Подарки Daf1k’a” (@podarkidaf1ka), 191 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podarkidaf1ka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.