Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Подарки своими руками

Channel

Подарки своими руками

@podar0chek

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

26,467subscribers

-2,143 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002048426285
TypeChannel
Username@podar0chek
DescriptionЛучший подарок — это подарок сделанный своими руками🥰 По всем вопросам @marpal00 #NHVJS
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 October 2026
Measurements held37
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/podar0chek

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

26,46728,61027,538.57 August 2026 — 28,610 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,610 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,584 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,569 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,548 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,507 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,480 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,450 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,388 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,339 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,293 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,270 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,238 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,201 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,169 subscribers22 August 2026 — 28,117 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,050 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,012 subscribers26 August 2026 — 27,972 subscribers27 August 2026 — 27,939 subscribers28 August 2026 — 27,905 subscribers29 August 2026 — 27,877 subscribers30 August 2026 — 27,826 subscribers31 August 2026 — 27,807 subscribers1 September 2026 — 27,748 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27,715 subscribers4 September 2026 — 27,669 subscribers7 September 2026 — 27,572 subscribers10 September 2026 — 27,495 subscribers12 September 2026 — 27,412 subscribers14 September 2026 — 27,352 subscribers15 September 2026 — 27,284 subscribers17 September 2026 — 27,220 subscribers28 September 2026 — 26,868 subscribers5 October 2026 — 26,690 subscribers9 October 2026 — 26,569 subscribers13 October 2026 — 26,467 subscribers7 August 202613 October 2026
37 measurements spanning 67 days, net -2,143. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,146–28,931 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Oct 2026, 11:5826,467-102
9 Oct 2026, 13:5526,569-121
5 Oct 2026, 04:1826,690-178
28 Sept 2026, 12:3526,868-352
17 Sept 2026, 20:0027,220-64
15 Sept 2026, 17:2027,284-68
14 Sept 2026, 04:2127,352-60
12 Sept 2026, 15:3827,412-83
10 Sept 2026, 15:1827,495-77
7 Sept 2026, 13:5727,572-97
4 Sept 2026, 16:1827,669-46
2 Sept 2026, 23:0827,715-33
1 Sept 2026, 17:5727,748-59
31 Aug 2026, 14:5527,807-19
30 Aug 2026, 17:4527,826-51
29 Aug 2026, 14:4727,877-28
28 Aug 2026, 16:5827,905-34
27 Aug 2026, 16:3427,939-33
26 Aug 2026, 17:5427,972-40
25 Aug 2026, 15:1228,012first reading

Engagement

153 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 110 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.47%
avg views ÷ 26,467 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,180
93 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
93
of 153 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 81 of 93 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held153 (12 July 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Views total109,994
Reactions total2,132
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Oct 2026, 16:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
994
Videos
639
Links
34

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
49m 58s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 78 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,463 reactions across 139 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,56783.6%
😢89616.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 140 of the 153 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,463 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Oct 2026, 13:00 UTC368 views13 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Делаем делаем!!! ❤️ - обязательно буду

❤13

13 Oct 2026, 10:00 UTC537 views23 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

Посмотрите какую милоту я нашла Топ? ❤️ - да 😢 - фигня

❤23

13 Oct 2026, 05:00 UTC730 views24 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

Крутой подарок для любителей Brawl Stars Сделали бы такой? ❤️ - да 😢 - нет

❤22😢2

12 Oct 2026, 10:00 UTC924 views16 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Свеча своими руками 🖤 Подойдёт для подарка? ❤️ — да 😢 — нет

❤8😢8

12 Oct 2026, 05:00 UTC909 views14 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Необычное оригами-колесо 🎡 Объёмное, яркое и похоже на настоящий мини-аттракцион — отличная идея для декора стола или подарка! Как тебе такая идея? ❤️ — супер, хочу сделать 😢 — выглядит круто

❤14

11 Oct 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,010 views29 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Photo

Делаем милые вазочки из обычных банок💕 Попробуешь повторить? ❤️ — да, очень мило 😢 — не нравится

❤25😢4

11 Oct 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,020 views28 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Поделки с подругой ❤️ Попробуете вместе? ❤️ — да 😢 — нет

❤26😢2

11 Oct 2026, 05:00 UTC≈1,070 views14 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Подвеска в китайском стиле 😍 Хочешь такое сделать? ❤️ — да очень 😢 — пробовала, не получилось…

❤12😢2

10 Oct 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,160 views30 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Декор джинсов своими руками 😍 Классно получилось? ❤️ — да

❤28😢2

Showing the 12 most recent of 153 posts we hold for @podar0chek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@podar0chek edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 September 2026

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Oct 2026, 17:03 UTCAnonymous Poll111 voters

Какую картину вы бы хотели нарисовать? 🎨 Можно выбрать несколько вариантов 👇

  1. 140%
  2. 258%
  3. 340%
  4. 443%
  5. 550%
  6. 630%
  7. 723%
  8. 849%
  9. 930%

The shares total 363%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Sept 2026, 17:29 UTCAnonymous Poll119 voters

Какую картину вы бы хотели нарисовать? 🎨 Можно выбрать несколько вариантов 👇

  1. 135%
  2. 244%
  3. 343%
  4. 436%
  5. 536%
  6. 635%
  7. 730%
  8. 837%
  9. 947%

The shares total 343%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTCAnonymous Poll267 voters

Какую картину вы бы хотели нарисовать? 🎨 Можно выбрать несколько вариантов 👇

  1. 135%
  2. 232%
  3. 340%
  4. 443%
  5. 543%
  6. 648%
  7. 729%
  8. 839%
  9. 944%

The shares total 353%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTCAnonymous Poll309 voters

Какую картину вы бы хотели нарисовать? 🎨 Можно выбрать несколько вариантов 👇

  1. 140%
  2. 243%
  3. 340%
  4. 425%
  5. 542%
  6. 635%
  7. 734%
  8. 846%
  9. 946%

The shares total 351%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 13 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Подарки своими руками” (@podar0chek), 26,467 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podar0chek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.