Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for POCUS MOSCOW

Channel

POCUS MOSCOW

@pocusmoscow

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,213subscribers

+303 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001526615932
TypeChannel
Username@pocusmoscow
DescriptionPoint-of-Care Ultrasound - экстренная ультразвуковая диагностика и навигация инвазивных манипуляций.
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/pocusmoscow

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,9108,2138,061.56 August 2026 — 7,910 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,911 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,927 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,931 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,940 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,943 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,952 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,955 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,959 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,989 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,997 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,007 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,020 subscribers2 October 2026 — 8,057 subscribers8 October 2026 — 8,062 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,095 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,115 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,127 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,130 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,136 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,149 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,187 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,193 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,208 subscribers10 November 2026 — 8,213 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 96 days, net +303. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,865–8,258 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 22:078,213+5
6 Nov 2026, 23:198,208+15
4 Nov 2026, 01:498,193+6
1 Nov 2026, 04:198,187+38
28 Oct 2026, 17:568,149+13
26 Oct 2026, 02:298,136+6
23 Oct 2026, 02:488,130+3
20 Oct 2026, 00:488,127+12
17 Oct 2026, 00:468,115+20
13 Oct 2026, 23:458,095+33
8 Oct 2026, 15:368,062+5
2 Oct 2026, 05:208,057+37
16 Sept 2026, 15:578,020+13
13 Sept 2026, 02:008,007+10
9 Sept 2026, 13:377,997+8
4 Sept 2026, 04:587,989+30
31 Aug 2026, 21:587,959+4
28 Aug 2026, 20:237,955+3
25 Aug 2026, 23:527,952+9
23 Aug 2026, 05:457,943first reading

Engagement

79 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 8,213 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,180
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 79 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held79 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total35,433
Reactions total383
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 01:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,440
Videos
≈547
Links
≈585

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 13m
Average length
2m 55s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

973 reactions across 78 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥27628.4%
👍24325.0%
❤21422.0%
custom 542734209367463014815115.5%
custom 5427232022252764138373.80%
❤‍🔥181.85%
👏131.34%
🥰70.719%
🤔60.617%
💯50.514%
🌚10.103%
😢10.103%
🙏10.103%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 973 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (13.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 20:29 UTC188 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

🎓 ШКОЛА МОЛОДОГО СПЕЦИАЛИСТА ММНКЦ им. С. П. Боткина 🎥 Продолжаем публиковать записи докладов Школы молодого специалиста по анестезиологии-реаниматологии! «ПАЦИЕНТ В ОПЕРАЦИОННОЙ: ЛОГИКА АНЕСТЕЗИИ» 📖 Доклад №4 «Клиническая фармакология ингаляционных анестетиков» 👩‍⚕️ Докладчик: Самунджян Яна Арменаковна — ординатор 1-го года по специальности «Анестезиология-реаниматология» ММНКЦ им. С. П. Боткина. 💡 Как работают ин…

👍1🔥1custom 54272320222527641381custom 54273420936746301481

11 Nov 2026, 18:17 UTC375 views6 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

📚 POCUS MOSCOW | ДАЙДЖЕСТ 29 октября — 11 ноября 2026 От карточек по КОС до интерактивного VExUS и нового подкаста — собрали главное за две недели. Сохраняйте, чтобы вернуться к материалам между дежурствами. 🫀 Гемодинамика: переосмыслили схему спустя 10 лет Вернулись к нашей старой инфографике по оценке волемического статуса и пересмотрели логику её применения. В центре — состояние сердца, ответ на преднагрузку и рис…

👍3🔥2❤1

10 Nov 2026, 19:03 UTC730 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🎙 Статьи, которые стоит прочитать. Теперь — ещё и послушать. Запускаем новый подкаст «На волне POCUS MOSCOW» на нашем обновлённом сайте! В основе выпусков — дайджест научных статей по POCUS / УЗИ, регионарной анестезии, лечению боли и интенсивной терапии. Обсуждаем, что изучали авторы, какие выводы можно сделать и что это значит для клинической практики. 🎧 Слушайте подкаст: https://pocus.moscow/podcast В описании вып…

👍5👏2🔥2🥰2custom 54273420936746301481

10 Nov 2026, 07:01 UTC931 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

10 ЛЕТ СПУСТЯ. МЫ ПЕРЕОСМЫСЛИЛИ НЕ ТОЛЬКО ИНФОГРАФИКУ. 🫀 Десять лет назад мы создали одну из наших первых образовательных схем — «Ультразвуковая оценка волемического статуса». НПВ, B-линии, сократимость сердца, цветные стрелки и попытка ответить на главный вопрос: «Нужна ли пациенту инфузия?» 💧 Для своего времени это была отличная шпаргалка! Но прошло 10 лет. Изменились технологии, появились новые исследования, р…

❤3custom 54273420936746301483👍1🔥1

9 Nov 2026, 12:34 UTC925 views1 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @interpain_ruPhoto

Внимание! Появилось 2 места на курс по регионарной анестезии 14-15 ноября в Москве. Следующий поток 23-24 января, регистрация открыта. TG / VK / МАХ

🔥1

8 Nov 2026, 04:24 UTC≈1,180 views15 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @interpain_ruVideo

При реанимации в условиях хаоса, нервной нагрузки и необходимости отбиваться от советчиков команда все равно должна работать четко, поэтому существуют протоколы, в частности, Cardiac Arrest Sonographic Assessment (CASA) protocol. Он хорош тем, что в каждую 10-секундную паузу между компрессиями он отвечает на какой-то один конкретный вопрос: — есть или нет тампонада (перед началом компрессии или в первую паузу) — оце…

custom 54273420936746301486👍5❤2🔥2

7 Nov 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,440 views31 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

🚀 POCUS MOSCOW ПРЕДСТАВЛЯЕТ: ИНТЕРАКТИВНЫЙ ТРЕНАЖЁР VExUS! Друзья, у нас новая разработка! 🔥 Мы создали бесплатный интерактивный тренажёр VExUS, который поможет не просто изучить протокол оценки венозного застоя, но и самостоятельно потренироваться в выполнении ультразвуковых измерений. 🩺 Что внутри? 🔹 Протокол VExUS — русскоязычная схема с пояснениями и алгоритмом оценки. 🔹 Иллюстрированный атлас — 9 обучающих …

🔥10custom 54273420936746301489👍5🥰3custom 54272320222527641382❤1❤‍🔥1

7 Nov 2026, 09:57 UTC963 views11 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @interpain_ruVideo

Какие сложности с катетеризацией яремной вены под УЗ? Часть 2. Методика выполнения Настройка аппарата, постановка рук, техника доступов, отработка самостоятельно — на курсах по УЗ-протоколам для анестезиологов, регионарной анестезии, интервенционному лечению боли под УЗ-навигацией. TG / VK / МАХ

👍4🔥4custom 54272320222527641383

6 Nov 2026, 15:14 UTC≈1,180 views19 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

🎓 ШКОЛА МОЛОДОГО СПЕЦИАЛИСТА ММНКЦ им. С. П. Боткина 🩺 АНЕСТЕЗИОЛОГИЯ-РЕАНИМАТОЛОГИЯ 🌟 Сегодня, 6 ноября 2026 года, замечательно прошло очередное заседание Школы молодого специалиста! 🧪 Тема встречи: «КЩС и газы крови — любимый анализ реаниматолога» В этот раз погрузились в одну из самых важных и непростых тем интенсивной терапии! 📚 Разобрали 8 актуальных вопросов: 🔹 Базовый алгоритм оценки нарушений КЩС. 🔹 Ре…

❤8custom 54273420936746301485🔥4👍1custom 54272320222527641381

6 Nov 2026, 11:31 UTC961 views9 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @interpain_ruVideo

Какие сложности с катетеризацией яремной вены под УЗ? Часть 1. Начинается всё еще раньше, с настройки аппарата TG / VK / МАХ

❤4❤‍🔥3🔥1custom 54272320222527641381

6 Nov 2026, 05:31 UTC≈1,280 views13 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

🎓 Школа Молодого Специалиста ММНКЦ им. С. П. Боткина АНЕСТЕЗИОЛОГИЯ-РЕАНИМАТОЛОГИЯ 🎥 Предлагаем вашему вниманию запись доклада с заседания Школы молодого специалиста от 29 сентября 2026 года. 📚 Тема доклада: «Механизмы боли, связанной с оперативным вмешательством. Клиническая фармакология неингаляционных анестетиков». 🎤 Докладчик: Маргарян Лена Араиковна — ординатор 1-го года по специальности «Анестезиология-реанима…

👍6❤3🔥3custom 54273420936746301481

5 Nov 2026, 09:23 UTC≈1,030 views17 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @interpain_ruVideo

Доступ к яремной вене по косой оси и в чем его преимущество ⬆️ TG / VK / МАХ

👍7🔥6❤2custom 54273420936746301482

Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @pocusmoscow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @pocusmoscow as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
28 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
28 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Медицинская Литература
@clinirec · 36,415
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Немедицина
@ybody · 40,205
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 29 August 2026
Анестезиология-реаниматология. Ординаторы Asia+
@orda_air · 20,758
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 October 2026
Клинфарм замес | Евгений Никитин
@tgnikitin · 44,077
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
Аккредитация врачей | Ординатура
@credit_med · 23,151
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
Medbooks
@supermedbook · 20,912
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 28 September 2026
Медицинская Россия
@mediamedics · 142,813
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Медач | Medical Channel
@medach · 27,930
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Поясни за мед
@poyasni_za_med · 22,200
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“POCUS MOSCOW” (@pocusmoscow), 8,213 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pocusmoscow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.