Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ПАНКУША

@pnksha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

18,658subscribers

+350 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001827082310
TypeChannel
Username@pnksha
Descriptionсамый отвратительный канал((🤮 #punk / dj / по вопросам: @pppunkkk (писать сразу с предложением)
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pnksha

Growth

18,30718,65818,482.56 August 2026 — 18,308 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,307 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,375 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,419 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,416 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,447 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,472 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,473 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,556 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,658 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +350. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,254–18,711 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:2318,658+102
13 Aug 2026, 14:3818,556+83
12 Aug 2026, 11:4318,473+1
11 Aug 2026, 10:2418,472+25
10 Aug 2026, 08:2618,447+31
9 Aug 2026, 08:2118,416-3
8 Aug 2026, 08:5218,419+44
7 Aug 2026, 08:3118,375+68
6 Aug 2026, 05:2518,307-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:3418,308first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 18,658 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,010
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held51 (1 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total153,610
Reactions total7,569
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
191
Videos
130
Links
77

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 58s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,535 reactions across 44 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮5,31281.3%
🤡5107.80%
💩3585.48%
👎3555.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,569reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈1,620 views138 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

жанна орешкина + семьсот семь + 17 SEVENTEEN — «как дура» у моих хороших друзей вышел главный фит альтернативной сцены этого месяца. кстати они почти все выступали на моей последней вечеринке в честь др слушать

🤮108🤡15💩8👎7

14 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,680 views138 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

сегодня вышел альбом marilyn manson — one assassination under god chapter 2 «я использовал каждый камень брошенный в меня чтобы отточить свои грани я перерос чистилище и вырезал эти песни на коже мира надеюсь это оставит шрам который вы не сможете забыть» — пишет мэнсон о релизе этот альбом это логическое продолжение предыдущей части 2024 года и его заключение и кстати на обложке его личный автопортрет. вдумайтесь

🤮111🤡16👎6💩5

14 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC≈1,630 views149 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

когда летом на 0.1 секунду повеяло осенним ветром:

🤮114👎14🤡13💩8

13 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈19,000 views212 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤮158🤡34👎13💩7

13 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC≈2,130 views157 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

первый подкаст с cupsize выйдет завтра на youtube канале VSRAP интересно о чем они будут говорить о музыке и сцене или о том как коля недавно отыграл свой легендарный аукс сет с телефона на моей вечеринке

🤮122💩14🤡13👎8

13 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC≈2,160 views141 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @sasha_trautvein

как же лил дрей ебет эту игру

🤮116🤡15👎6💩4

13 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈2,150 views146 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

@ФакШиза дропает свой первый альбом 21 августа 凸 ◣ _ ◢ 凸 шизу жестко поддерживает сам гоша рубчинский — прохор снимался для его новой коллекции и выступал на афтерпати показа а новый клип с альбома ему снял никита вильчинский. плюс он несколько раз лайвил на тусовках панкуша & friends его сниппет набрал 70к лайков заставив респектовать запад вроде группы the hellp и режиссера из lyrical lemonade. шиза строит карьер

🤮105🤡24💩10👎7

13 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC≈2,150 views144 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

НОВЫЙ альбом crystal castles amnesty (II) полностью ГОТОВ группа уже полностью закончила работу над релизом. сообщается что альбом был создан в трушном духе их первого альбома crystal castles (I) но при этом выдержан в дарковой атмосфере amnesty (I) релиз обещает быть тяжелым по звуку а все треки оттуда будут кардинально отличаться друг от друга. на альбоме есть вокал эдит френсис так что осталось только дождаться

🤮118🤡10💩9👎7

12 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC≈2,020 views143 reactionsread 14 August 2026

вайсолонли с днем рождения брат

🤮129💩6👎4🤡4

12 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC≈2,030 views138 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤮116🤡10💩8👎4

12 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈2,080 views138 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤮119👎7💩6🤡6

12 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC≈2,070 views145 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

huzzy b — lxve cvlt харизма панка в сочетании с романтиком добряком. альбом написан в одной эстетике любви до смерти. реализация стиля и атмосфера без оговорок 10/10 хаззи не теряется на тяжелых битах а структура и ритмика на уровне. проделана огромная работа от вокала до саунд дизайна и звука сочных гитар запомните мои слова — этот лав культ через 2-3 года создаст такой культ на который будут равняться как сейчас

🤮122👎10🤡9💩4

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @pnksha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@pnksha edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 5,220 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПАНКУША” (@pnksha), 18,658 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pnksha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.