Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PLAYBOY_OF

Channel

PLAYBOY_OF

@playboy_of

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

520subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001875718366
TypeChannel
Username@playboy_of
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/playboy_of

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5205285247 August 2026 — 528 subscribers8 August 2026 — 528 subscribers16 August 2026 — 527 subscribers23 August 2026 — 526 subscribers30 August 2026 — 525 subscribers9 September 2026 — 524 subscribers18 September 2026 — 521 subscribers2 October 2026 — 520 subscribers7 August 20262 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 56 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 519–529 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Oct 2026, 13:15520-1
18 Sept 2026, 00:18521-3
9 Sept 2026, 05:56524-1
30 Aug 2026, 11:34525-1
23 Aug 2026, 21:53526-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:04527-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:00528no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:19528first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3151.7%
🔥2541.7%
👏23.33%
😁11.67%
🥰11.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 30 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Apr 2026, 21:34 UTC960 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Самый сложный тип фана?

  1. Молчун30%
  2. Жмот25%
  3. Романтик9%
  4. Истеричка9%
  5. «Я просто поболтать»49%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Apr 2026, 21:45 UTC871 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему фан платит один раз и исчезает🅾️ Ситуация, которая на дистанции сливает больше всего денег: фан зашёл,включился в диалог,купил и после этого тишина На первый взгляд кажется, что это “норм”,но на деле - это потерянный потенциал Что здесь важно понять: первая покупка - это не результат,это момент, когда человек уже готов платить и именно в этот момент решается, останется он или нет Что происходит на практике:…

❤2🔥2

25 Apr 2026, 21:33 UTC613 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему обучение чатеров не даёт результата?🐇 Проблема, с которой сталкиваются почти все тимлиды Вроде бы обучение есть,материалы есть,объяснения даны,но по факту деньги не растут и дело не в чатерах Что происходит на самом деле? Чатер слушает, понимает, кивает - но работает по-старому, потому что знания не переходят в действия Где ошибка? Чаще всего: слишком много теории, нет закрепления на практике, нет контроля …

❤3🔥3

24 Apr 2026, 20:45 UTC482 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Если оставить только один источник трафика что бы вы выбрали?

  1. Онлик внутрянка33%
  2. TikTok6%
  3. Reddit54%
  4. Twitter/X4%
  5. Telegram4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Apr 2026, 19:17 UTC447 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤3🔥1😁1

21 Apr 2026, 22:07 UTC449 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему рост агентства не всегда означает рост прибыли🐇 Когда говорят о развитии агентства, чаще всего в фокусе оказываются количественные показатели: больше моделей, больше чатов, больше активности. На первый взгляд это выглядит как очевидный прогресс,однако в реальности рост не всегда напрямую связан с увеличением прибыли. Более того, на определённом этапе он может начать её сдерживать Что на самом деле происходит…

❤4🔥4

20 Apr 2026, 20:50 UTC365 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, первый разбор для вас уже в блоге! Сегодня разобрали чат чатера с опытом пару месяцев. Прочитать постик можно тут 👉🏻 БЛОГ Если же вы хотите чтобы разобрали ваш чат/систему агентства/кейсы пишите @PlayGirl_Onlyfans

❤4🔥4

17 Apr 2026, 16:21 UTC428 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

PLAYBOY MAGAZINE🐇 Если ты давно здесь - ты уже знаешь, сколько всего разбросано по каналу,а если недавно - скорее всего, ты тонешь в информации. Мы решили это исправить и собрать многие посты в одном журнале для вас. Ниже ты найдёшь всё, что реально влияет на деньги, рост и удержание моделей. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Для агентств Как удержать …

❤4🔥3👏2🥰1

15 Apr 2026, 18:50 UTC473 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Вам было бы интересно получить разбор ваших чатов/системы/кейсов?

  1. Да,мне было бы интересно получить разбор чатов52%
  2. Да,мне было бы интересно получить разбор агенства(системы/кейсов)39%
  3. Да,мне было бы интересно получить разбор своей работы как скаута13%
  4. Не уверен17%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @playboy_of. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Apr 2026, 21:34 UTCAnonymous Poll69 voters

Самый сложный тип фана?

  1. Молчун30%
  2. Жмот25%
  3. Романтик9%
  4. Истеричка9%
  5. «Я просто поболтать»49%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Apr 2026, 20:45 UTCAnonymous Poll52 voters

Если оставить только один источник трафика что бы вы выбрали?

  1. Онлик внутрянка33%
  2. TikTok6%
  3. Reddit54%
  4. Twitter/X4%
  5. Telegram4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Apr 2026, 18:50 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

Вам было бы интересно получить разбор ваших чатов/системы/кейсов?

  1. Да,мне было бы интересно получить разбор чатов52%
  2. Да,мне было бы интересно получить разбор агенства(системы/кейсов)39%
  3. Да,мне было бы интересно получить разбор своей работы как скаута13%
  4. Не уверен17%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Apr 2026, 15:49 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

Как у вас вообще с текучкой кадров?

  1. Постоянно текучка28%
  2. Вообще нет текучки,все сидят стабильно19%
  3. Сам заменяю переодически некоторые кадры25%
  4. 50/5031%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 30 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PLAYBOY_OF” (@playboy_of), 520 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/playboy_of.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.