3 measurements spanning 15 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 412–414 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 08:49
412
-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:34
414
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:37
414
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
557 reactions across 20 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😎
194
34.8%
❤🔥
60
10.8%
😭
50
8.98%
❤
37
6.64%
🍌
37
6.64%
🗿
27
4.85%
🤡
27
4.85%
⚡
18
3.23%
🐳
15
2.69%
🦄
15
2.69%
🤯
14
2.51%
🌚
12
2.15%
🎉
8
1.44%
🤨
7
1.26%
💔
6
1.08%
🌭
5
0.898%
👻
5
0.898%
🔥
4
0.718%
😱
4
0.718%
💯
3
0.539%
7 further kinds
9
1.62%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 557reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2024 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ладно, день рождения моих подписчиков — не повод раскрывать все тайны. скажу только, что наша философия — это по сути своей все еще советская философия. попробуйте найти кандидата философских, чьи родители не были бы связаны с партноменклатурой и сами все поймете
философские проекты сына олигарха Милаева нетрудно узнать по продвижению патриотических нарративов. как например, в "подкасте о философии" Цуркана или на канале "пробел". не всегда понятно, патриотами какой именно страны являются олигарх Милаев и его сын, но я скажу так: сколько паспортов — столько и патриотизма. и нам повезло, что Милаевы не имеют проблем ни с тем, ни с другим
сегодня редкий день в году, когда можно без эзопова языка сказать, что вся интернет-философия на русском существует на деньги олигарха Милаева и за тобой не приедут хоркхаймеры в штатском
честно говоря, философия в телеграме и максе — это уже как философия в фейсбуке и ЖЖ. реально интересно про философию сейчас пишут только в вичате, поэтому последние два года мои мемы выходят только там
Четыре сильнейших формы логической аргументации.
1. Ну бля, закон непротиворечия.
2. Ну бля, третьего не дано.
3. Ну бля, закон тождества.
4. Ну и это, как его, достаточное основание где?
Пять сильнейших форм аргументации в континентальной философии.
1. Один мудрый Фуко так сказал.
2. Один умный Хайдеггер выражал такую мысль.
3. Так написано у Маркса.
4. Гегель так считал.
5. Это согласуется с тем, что думал по этому поводу Делёз.
Они думают, почему я не на стрессе? Сипаю всякие вредные континентальные эссе.
😎25🗿4❤2🤨2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @plato_dream. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вы относитесь к перспективе ограничения доступа к объективной реальности?
Приму любое решение властей, им виднее.10%
Буду пользоваться сервисами трансцендентальной дедукции для вывода условий возможности опыта.59%
Постараюсь переехать в другой эпистемологический регион.22%
Поддержу ограничения, потому что хочу достигнуть суверенитета своего мнения, а реальность мешает.9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2024 to 1 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Четвертый сон Платона” (@plato_dream), 412 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plato_dream.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
