Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐ฏ๐š๐ ๐š๐›๐จ๐ง๐๐ฌโš”๏ธ

Channel

๐ฏ๐š๐ ๐š๐›๐จ๐ง๐๐ฌโš”๏ธ

@plastunstr777

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Cite this entry

176subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001975226336
TypeChannel
Username@plastunstr777
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/plastunstr777

Growth

1761801787 August 2026 โ€” 180 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 180 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 177 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 176 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 175โ€“181 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 00:17176-1
14 Aug 2026, 23:54177-3
8 Aug 2026, 13:01180no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:27180first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
64.1%
avg views รท 176 subscribers
Avg views / post
113
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.27%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 July 2026 โ€“ 6 August 2026)
Views total2,142
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ”ฅ3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC68 viewsread 8 August 2026

ะ•ัะปะธ ะธะฝั‚ะตั€ะตััƒัŽั‚ ะฐั€ะฑัƒะทั‹ ะพะฑั€ะฐั‰ะฐะนัั

Signed ะญะดะณะฐั€ ะšะตััะฝ

6 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC69 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed ะญะดะณะฐั€ ะšะตััะฝ

2 Aug 2026, 02:19 UTC118 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/7_efo_7?igsh=MWMxdGNleXRucWJjNw%3D%3D&utm_source=qr

Signed ๐•ฐ๐–‹๐–” ๐•ฒ๐–†๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–Š๐–“๐–˜๐–๐–Ž๐–ž ๐Ÿฆ…

2 Aug 2026, 02:19 UTC118 viewsread 8 August 2026

ะŸะพะถะฐะปัƒะนัั‚ะฐ

Signed ๐•ฐ๐–‹๐–” ๐•ฒ๐–†๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–Š๐–“๐–˜๐–๐–Ž๐–ž ๐Ÿฆ…

2 Aug 2026, 02:19 UTC117 viewsread 8 August 2026

ะะพะฒะพะต ะฒะธะดะตะพ ะฟั€ะพะดะฒะธะณะฐั‚ัŒ

Signed ๐•ฐ๐–‹๐–” ๐•ฒ๐–†๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–Š๐–“๐–˜๐–๐–Ž๐–ž ๐Ÿฆ…

2 Aug 2026, 02:18 UTC98 viewsread 8 August 2026

ะ’ัะต ะฒ ะธะฝัั‚ัƒ

Signed ๐•ฐ๐–‹๐–” ๐•ฒ๐–†๐–Ž๐–˜๐–๐–Š๐–“๐–˜๐–๐–Ž๐–ž ๐Ÿฆ…

30 Jul 2026, 21:45 UTC113 viewsread 8 August 2026

ะกะฟะฐัะธะฑะพ

Signed ะะฝะดะพ

30 Jul 2026, 21:19 UTC111 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ะกะบะธะฝัŒั‚ะต ะดะตะฝะตะณ ะฝะฐ ัะธะณะฐั€ะตั‚ั‹ ะฟะถ

๐Ÿ”ฅ3

Signed ะะฝะดะพ

30 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC104 viewsread 8 August 2026

ั ะฒะฟะฝ ะฝะต ั€ะฐะฑะพั‚ะฐะตั‚ ัั‚ะฐั€ั‹ะน ั‚ั‚

Signed เธ€

30 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC98 viewsread 8 August 2026

ัะบะฐะถะธั‚ะต ั‡ั‚ะพ ะผะฝะต ัะดะตะปะฐั‚ัŒ ั‡ั‚ะพะฑ ั‚ะธะบ ั‚ะพะบ ั€ะฐะฑะพั‚ะฐะป

Signed เธ€

30 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC96 viewsread 8 August 2026

ะตัะปะธ ั‚ัƒั‚ ะพัั‚ะฐะปะธััŒ ะถะธะฒั‹ะต ะปัŽะดะธ

Signed เธ€

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @plastunstr777. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jul 2026, 18:19 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

ะกั‚ะพะธั‚ ะปะธ ะšะฐั€ะตะฝัƒ ะฟะพะฒะตัะธั‚ัŒัั

  1. ะ”ะฐ50%
  2. ะšะพะฝะตั‡ะฝะพ70%
  3. 100%90%

The shares total 210%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐ฏ๐š๐ ๐š๐›๐จ๐ง๐๐ฌโš”๏ธโ€ (@plastunstr777), 176 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plastunstr777.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.