Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

💰ПЛАНЫ ПУТ@НЫ

@planyputany

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,671subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001874270729
TypeChannel
Username@planyputany
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/planyputany

Growth

2,6712,6782,674.57 August 2026 — 2,678 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,677 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,671 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,670–2,679 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 04:312,671-6
8 Aug 2026, 12:342,677-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:192,678first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 27 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

399 reactions across 11 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18746.9%
👍4912.3%
🔥348.52%
😢164.01%
❤‍🔥153.76%
👏143.51%
💯133.26%
😨112.76%
😱92.26%
🤨92.26%
🤝82.01%
👀71.75%
🗿61.50%
41.00%
🤔41.00%
😁30.752%
🙈30.752%
🥰30.752%
👎20.501%
👌10.251%
1 further kind10.251%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 399reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2025 to 9 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Apr 2026, 16:12 UTC≈2,660 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Какой женщине ДАЮТ?❤️ Дают подарки, букеты, оплачивают отпуск.. И это еще помимо дани, которую оставляют нижние. И даже просить и намекать не надо💸😉 Мужчины сами дарят и получают от этого орг*зм❤️‍🔥 Вот реальный кейс: одной из девушек с канала Той самой Госпожи мужчина скинул 6000€ за то, что не смог встретить ее в аэропорту🤭 Могла бы она сказать: "Да все нормально, не переживай"?. Могла😉 Но она знает себе ценно

10🗿6👍2💯2🔥1

8 Apr 2026, 16:20 UTC≈2,270 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Познакомились на мальчишнике его друга 😅 Напишу об этом отдельный пост, потерпите 🫶🏻

25😱4👏1

8 Apr 2026, 16:10 UTC≈2,160 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Причина ухода простая - отношения, в которых я счастлива. Не думала, что смогу кого-то так сильно полюбить 🙈💔. Конкретно сейчас не работаю. Развиваюсь в сфере эзотерики, начала разбираться в лунных днях, матрице судьбы, таро и нумерологии. Видимо скоро начну дышать маткой 😂👌🏻 и учить этому вас. В общем занимаюсь своими хобби, а за остальное отвечает мужчина.

23❤‍🔥6👏5🥰3😁2

8 Apr 2026, 15:58 UTC≈1,930 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я тут описание канала сменила… Соскучилась по вам ❤️. Поболтаем? Спросить анонимно 👇🏻 https://sprosi.link/planyputany@2

8😱4👍2😨2

27 Jul 2025, 16:21 UTC≈8,510 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Девочки и мальчики. Вы знаете, что я давно не веду канал, как раньше, в связи с тем, что практически ушла из сферы. Но! Опыт, как говорится, не пропьешь 😁. И даже не смотря на отсутствие постов на канале, ко мне все равно часто обращаются девочки с просьбой провести им консультацию. Некоторых я беру, но очень многим отказываю, так как на подготовку мне требуется время (я всегда очень тщательно готовлюсь и индивидуа

28❤‍🔥9👍5🔥3

19 Jun 2025, 07:26 UTC≈7,390 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я считаю, что люди разучились общаться и решать проблемы разговором. Теперь при каждом удобном случае все просто блокируют друг друга и уходят в игнор. Но помните, сбегая от других - вы сбегаете от самих себя. Лично я никого никогда не блокировала, если этот человек не представлял для меня угрозу (мошенники) или неприятности (преследование, навязчивые менеджеры продаж, рассылки, на которые я не давала согласия). Ос

41👍15🤝8🔥5👏3💯2

6 Jun 2025, 14:07 UTC≈6,470 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как думаете, правда?)

😨8👀6👍6👎1🤔1

6 Jun 2025, 14:07 UTC≈6,360 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @exploitexPhoto

6 лет тюрьмы за НЮДСЫ — в России начали массово ловить авторов телеграм-каналов с эротикой. В Екатеринбурге — новый кейс. Девушка вела блог, по её словам «для творчества», доход составил всего 10 тысяч рублей. Теперь ей грозит от 2 до 6 лет лишения свободы. Творчество отменяется. @exploitex

😢16🤨9👍76🙈2😁1😨1

28 May 2025, 10:47 UTC≈5,910 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У меня часто спрашивают: — К кому пойти на съёмку? — Кто реально понимает, как должно выглядеть портфолио, чтобы анкета не просто была красивой, а работала? И я каждый раз вспоминаю Mr.Brass — Александра. У него не раз снимались мои девочки, и я видела «живой» результат: анкеты стали заметнее, фотки — словно из рекламы чего-то дорогого, а не просто кадры ради лайков Это инструмент👌🏼 У Александра очень крутое портф

12💯9🔥84🤔2👎1🙏1

28 May 2025, 10:45 UTC≈4,530 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На самом деле мне нравятся все фото без исключения, но если рассмотреть конкретно образы и саму композицию фото - 3 и 5 кадры откровенно проигрывают остальным. Я думаю вы согласитесь, что ни для тем, ни для сайтов эти кадры выигрышными не будут. А вот в остальные снимки я влюблена, и даже скажу вам кое-что по секрету 🤫

26👍7👏5🔥2👀1👌1

27 May 2025, 17:24 UTC≈4,530 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Так вам будет проще, поехали 👇🏻 (Какие фото дешевят? 🤔)

  1. 🟣 1 и 320%
  2. 🟣 4 и 710%
  3. 🟣 6 и 810%
  4. 🟣 3 и 542%
  5. 🟣 4 и 618%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @planyputany. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 May 2025, 17:24 UTCAnonymous Poll543 voters

Так вам будет проще, поехали 👇🏻 (Какие фото дешевят? 🤔)

  1. 🟣 1 и 320%
  2. 🟣 4 и 710%
  3. 🟣 6 и 810%
  4. 🟣 3 и 542%
  5. 🟣 4 и 618%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2025 to 9 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💰ПЛАНЫ ПУТ@НЫ” (@planyputany), 2,671 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/planyputany.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.