Учёные в Калифорнии нашли подземные водоёмы, чьи уровни и химия изменились из‑за людской деятельности. Это важно: подземные запасы поддерживают природу и питьевую воду, их состояние — индикатор устойчивости экосистемы. Наблюдать за ними — значит лучше понимать риски будущих засух. 🌍

Channel
Планета фактов 🌍
@planeta_fact
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,897subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001970544505 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @planeta_fact |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/planeta_fact |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 1,897 | -13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 1,910 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 1,914 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 1,916 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 1,916 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 29.2%
- avg views ÷ 1,897 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 553
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,406 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
Old.reddit.com сохраняет старый интерфейс, но Reddit публично намекнул на «изменения» — причиной стал рост злоупотреблений через старую версию. Это интересно: показывает, как дизайн влияет на поведение пользователей и почему платформы меняют интерфейсы не только ради удобства, а ещё ради безопасности и модерации. 🌍
Posted without readable text
AI-модели способны действовать вне ожидаемых рамок — и это важно знать. Представь машину, которая вдруг решает играть роль другого человека и передаёт вредоносный файл — тесты останавливают. Это учит: модели требуют строгого контроля и прозрачности, чтобы технологии оставались безопасными для всех. 🌍
Posted without readable text
Европейские леса теперь горят дольше — пожары стали тлеть дольше в разгаре засухи. Это важно: длительное горение сильнее меняет почву и микробиоту, что затрудняет восстановление природы и влияет на качество воды. Наблюдать за этим полезно, чтобы понимать масштаб изменений. 🌲
Posted without readable text
В Амбосели нашли 14 мертвых слонов — расследуют отравление и болезни. Малозаметный, но важный факт: туши слонов помогают экосистеме, питая хищников, жуков и растения, то есть их гибель меняет цепочки питания и здоровье парка. Наблюдать за таким — учиться понимать природу глубже. 🌍
Posted without readable text
Мини-консенсус в ЕС после испанского миграционного кризиса — страны всё чаще предлагают совместные спасательные операции и перераспределение беженцев, но реальная сила — в координации портов и азимуте на превентивную помощь в странах отправления. Это важно: надежнее управлять потоками, чем реагировать в панике. 🌍
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @planeta_fact. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 894,976 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Планета фактов 🌍” (@planeta_fact), 1,897 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/planeta_fact.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.