Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Plan B

Channel

Plan B

@planbch

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

25subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002201476273
TypeChannel
Username@planbch
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged5 times, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/planbch

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

252625.57 August 2026 — 26 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 22 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–26 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 05:4325-1
11 Aug 2026, 08:0526no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:4826first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

64 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3656.3%
👍1625.0%
custom 528533623275731220934.69%
custom 532585019540400521734.69%
custom 532795807515856815834.69%
🤡34.69%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2025 to 1 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2025, 17:30 UTC76 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52853362327573122093custom 53258501954040052173custom 53279580751585681583

8 Feb 2025, 13:53 UTC250 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Как и обещал, статья как лоу-банкам немного заработать Спойлер: Для этого вам будет нужен паспорт и карта (можно родителей) 1 - Регистрируемся на MEXC (можете использовать эту ссылку, если не хотите попасться на фишинг — она безопасна и ведет на официальный сайт) 2 - Проходим верификацию по паспорту или другому документу (вроде достаточно просто фото) 3 - Переходим в раздел 'Купить крипто' и выбираем подраздел P…

🔥3

7 Feb 2025, 21:25 UTC219 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Хотите расскажу, как лоу-банкам немного заработать буквально за 10 минут?

🔥4

29 Jan 2025, 14:37 UTC230 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

В опросе лидирует Solana Сейчас, конечно, на Solana куда больше хайпа, ведь эфир полностью пропустил мету мемов. Что это значит? Это значит, что на коротком промежутке времени Ethereum Foundation была неэффективна, и упустила мету мемов. Я не думаю, что это отставание говорит о том что solana полностью заменит эфир. В экосистеме Ethereum до сих пор сосредоточена большая часть ликвидности и DeFi-протоколов. И что …

🔥3

28 Jan 2025, 11:25 UTC176 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🚀 Rocket-cheque for 0.4 TON (2.0$) Inside cheque: 8 activation(s) for 0.05 TON (0.2$)

👍3🔥1

27 Jan 2025, 15:47 UTC149 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

На сегодня, всё Где торговать, Вы знаете - https://mexc.com/planbch

🔥3

27 Jan 2025, 15:31 UTC165 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Отпишитесь от всех Решил написать еще один пост про эту тему... Как же у меня горит, от этих всех каналов в телеграм, инфлюенсеров, предпренимателей, и разного рода "экспертов". Все как один пишут, про deepseek, и что рынок упал из за него. Напоминаю Deepseek r1 вышел 21 января, после чего цена акций nvidia выросла на 8%. Где были неделю назад все те кто сейчас пишет о Deepseek? Для вашего понимая, до r1 у deepse…

🔥3

27 Jan 2025, 14:08 UTC118 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Это NVDA. Для наглядности

🔥4

27 Jan 2025, 12:39 UTC121 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Почему весь рынок это просто манипуляция? Вы уже, наверняка, слышали новости о том что Индекс Nasdaq 100 снизился и вместе с ним и криптовалютный рынок. А снизился он, якобы, из за китайского DeepSeek, это такая llm, которая оказалась сильно эффективнее американских аналогов, и мол поэтому весь рынок обвалился. Но, это просто смешно, потому что последняя модель deepseek r1 вышла уже 21 января, но рынок это понял т…

🔥3

26 Jan 2025, 12:02 UTC92 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Я думаю, у эфира большой потенциал

🔥2

26 Jan 2025, 11:54 UTC99 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Про что делать посты?

  1. Ethereum38%
  2. Solana50%
  3. Ton25%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @planbch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jan 2025, 11:54 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

Про что делать посты?

  1. Ethereum38%
  2. Solana50%
  3. Ton25%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2025 to 1 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Plan B” (@planbch), 25 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/planbch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.