Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

План Б

@plan_b_collective

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,837subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001370352397
TypeChannel
Username@plan_b_collective
Created31 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/plan_b_collective

Growth

1,8361,8381,8376 August 2026 — 1,838 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,838 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,836 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,837 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,836–1,838 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:161,837+1
9 Aug 2026, 23:361,836-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:321,838no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:571,838first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 12 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.7%
avg views ÷ 1,837 subscribers
Avg views / post
766
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (12 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,595
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC234 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Математика и предвзятость науки. Савватеев | 1 часть Смотреть - PBvideo Смотреть - ВК Посмотреть остальные части вы можете, подписавшись на закрытый контент ПБ: https://t.me/PBSubscribe_bot

2 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC584 viewsread 7 August 2026

Когда как не в день ВДВ писать о роли десантных войск в современной войне? Коротко, ВДВ не нужны. Всех причастных с праздником. Чуть раскроем мысль. Прямая роль ВДВ, согласно советским доктринам - проведение операций с десантированием. Под эту задачу была разработана и линейка десантируемой бронетехники. С развитием ПВО более актуальной и гибкой концепцией стали не десантируемые, а аэромобильные войска. Собст

31 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC593 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Философия Дугина. Часть 3 Смотреть - PBvideo Смотреть - ВК Посмотреть остальные части вы можете, подписавшись на закрытый контент ПБ: https://t.me/PBSubscribe_bot

24 Jul 2026, 13:31 UTC924 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Космополит Дёмушкин и русские националисты «План Б». 1 часть Смотреть - PBvideo Смотреть - ВК Подписка на закрытый контент ПБ: https://t.me/PBSubscribe_bot

20 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как не надо собирать коммунистов Смотреть - PBvideo Смотреть - ВК Подписка на закрытый контент ПБ: https://t.me/PBSubscribe_bot

17 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

КрасноBY И «научный» «централизм». 1 часть Смотреть - PBvideo Смотреть - ВК Подписка на закрытый контент ПБ: https://t.me/PBSubscribe_bot

15 Jul 2026, 05:25 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Деньги, повесточка и важнейшее из искусств - игры Смотреть - PBvideo Смотреть - ВК Подписка на закрытый контент ПБ: https://t.me/PBSubscribe_bot

14 Jul 2026, 06:58 UTC832 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fakingleftie

Если вам интересно, а почему складывается такая ситуация. 1. Тотальное недофинансирование разработки и исследований. Разница будет минимум на два порядка (то есть, более чем в 100 раз). Речь не про финансовые затраты в целом, а то, что достаётся непосредственно разработчикам и исследователям, а не манагерам и прочим. 2. Фундаментальный отказ от собственных разработок на основании "дорого" и "не окупается". Что довол

10 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTC910 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Михаил Елизаров. Постмодернизм как культурологическая спекуляция. Смотреть - PBvideo Постмодернизм — это не только «совокупность воззрений и манифестных явлений» в современном искусстве, обществе, философии, отстаивающая идеи нового мироощущения, новой чувствительности, интертекстуальности, радикальной плюральности, и т. д., но и огромная культурологическая фикция, служащая задачам «глобального упрощения. Подобно ф

9 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC869 viewsread 7 August 2026

Рабочий фетишизм: РПР, Волкова и Галко. 2 часть Смотреть - PBvideo Смотреть - ВК Подписка на закрытый контент ПБ: https://t.me/PBSubscribe_bot

8 Jul 2026, 18:39 UTC903 viewsread 7 August 2026

Приходит еврей в паспортный стол, просит сменить фамилию, вместо Петрова, значит, Иванов. Но паспортистка возмущается, -- Мы же Вам сменили недавно с "Рабинович" на "Петров". Зачем Вам опять менять? -- А, отвечает еврей, -- Если меня спросят, какая фамилия была до "Иванов", то скажу "Петров".

4 Jul 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

Сегодня в день 4 июля праздник в США - посвящается им эта песня!

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @plan_b_collective. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 538,160 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“План Б” (@plan_b_collective), 1,837 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plan_b_collective.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.