Channel
@pizdaskamerambudet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002582020074 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pizdaskamerambudet |
| Description | по всем вопросом @arsenalforeverlove |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 30 April 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pizdaskamerambudet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 4 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 4 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 30 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2025 to 3 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Фишинг в "телеграмме". Фишинг —вид интернет-мошенничества, целью которого является получение доступа к конфиденциальным данным пользователей — логинам и паролям. 🌟 Как "фишинг" работает в "телеграмме"? 🌟 Есть много способ с помощью которого скамеры крадут аккаунты в телеграмме. Приведу пример: вам пишет "админ" якобы от лица "теллеграма" Уважаемый пользователь, мы заметили подозрительную активность в вашем аккаунт…
❤1
Какие ещё существуют скамы в приложении "телеграмм" и как избегать их?🌟 Вот такой вопрос я задал себе сегодня, и решил углубиться в данной теме. 🌟 Я буду выкладывать пост на эту тему каждый день в течении недели, каждый день вид скама будет отличаться от предыдущего. 🌟 Итак, существуют много видов скама в "телеграмме", но я решил рассказать о самых популярных. Пожалуй, вы все видели сообщения пожохего характера в ч…
отдельное спасибо ему @rootmarkexe, за информацию
также в телеграмме, помимо тех банальных скамов, которые были в канале ранее, есть более изощренные скамеры, создают крипту, прогревают, и в дальнейшем не дают ни вывести деньги, ни торговаться этой криптой
❤3
если вас, когда либо скамили в телеграмме, можете написать тут: @arsenalforeverlove мы все освятим
❤2
скриншот того, как все тот же @m80hlss скамит ситуацию примерно такая же, как и в прошлой ситуации парню 15 лет, скам на 500 рублей это были последние его деньги
@Pyshka9 этого молодого парня также заскамил он: @m80hlss сумма 500 рублей этому парню 15 лет
а вот и пруфы что это он, а не какая нибудь подстава
и после этого длинного сообщение, он удаляет весь наш чат, и банит меня из его тгк
кстати, он аргументировал свою гарантию этим постом, я так и не понял, в чем гарантия
тут он все также просит 6666 рублей и говорит мол, гарантировано все
очень тактически уходит от моего вопроса, и не признавал (так не признает) что наебал
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @pizdaskamerambudet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“против скама” (@pizdaskamerambudet), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pizdaskamerambudet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.