The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
Пиздаболы Телеграм
@pizdaboly_telegram
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
20subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001394578199 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pizdaboly_telegram |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 7 October 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pizdaboly_telegram |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 20 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 22 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 22 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 21 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 7 October 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Просто тупой пиздабол - @Valeriyosipov нулячий, тупой, обиженный на весь мир пиздабол. Бегает по всем сайтам и рассказывает что все кидала вокруг а он единственный Робин Гуд, который все может в телеграм и работает на совесть. Увидите где-то, дайте подсрачник ℹ️ #id390315741
✅ Как в Telegram уводят аккаунты, крадут каналы и как от этого защититься Ничего супер нового, но рекомендую почитать: источник
Уже писали про тупых обезьян, которые кроме как спиздить оформление нашего чата, более ни на что не способны. Это уже третья копия группы. Малолетки тупорылые, телеграм пишется с одной буквой М - чему вы людей обучать собрались? Позорники, блять. Жалкая копия: @protelegrama Тупой лосось: @TelegaGarant ℹ️ #id1206147696
✅ У нас появился чат для бизнеса - @biznes_tusovka Там уютно, можно поговорить о заработке онлайн или оффлайн и пообщаться на тему денег, прибыли и трендовых направлениях. 🔘 Присоединяйся сейчас - @biznes_tusovka
Лохотронщики с заманухой на бесплатный тест и вам обязательно нужно отключить антивирус 😂 Утром подали жалобу на чертей, уже и акк и канал, который они называют сайтом забанены.
@Mate5555 приполз в чат @inviting_chatov чтобы ему спарсили бесплатно чат и почистили от дублей из донора. Не умеет пользоваться Эксель и парсить, но на соседних площадках продает инвайт по 1 рублю 😂 ждём лоха который купит. ℹ️ #id1391390388 Зы: после поста резко сменил юзернейм @Guard99 Лушпак, айди не сменишь
@zhirc0t мелкий кидала на баллы на разных сервисах. ℹ️ #id1377162258
@Timofey23456 - #крыса маленькая, не рекомендуем работать с человеком, который пытается втираться в доверие предлагая низкие цены, просит помочь начать зарабатывать в телеграм, а потом пытается увести клиентов себе) Также после того как берет заказы у клиентов, почему то резко меняет стоимость с 1,5 рубля на 3 рубля, добавляя еще 1,5 р за парсинг ца. ℹ️ #id1216177084
@AvtomatRASS продавец парсера, инвайтера и чекера за 100 русских рублей. Проблема в том, что они 2018 года и не работают 😂 ℹ️ #id1309446480
@vkmixwork - кидок, котрого давно хуесосит весь телеграм за его предложения парсить чаты за деньги и инвайтить в каналы, но ещё не всё обожглись, подвозят новых ) пидорок под фото девы сммщицы, галимый, тупой лосось, который просто берёт деньги и не делает работу. Обезьяна сменила юзернейм на @Workjobstg ℹ️ #id1082948205
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @pizdaboly_telegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 939,314 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 14
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 14
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@pizdaboly_telegram named 14 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пиздаболы Телеграм” (@pizdaboly_telegram), 20 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pizdaboly_telegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.