Bot

Pix Stars

@pix_starsbot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

56,763monthly users

+8,666 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	8985573502
Type	Bot
Username	@pix_starsbot
First recorded	11 August 2026
Last confirmed live	17 August 2026
Measurements held	12
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/pix_starsbot

Growth

12 measurements spanning 11 days, net +8,666. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,718–58,669 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Monthly users	Change
17 Aug 2026, 19:49	56,763	+394
16 Aug 2026, 19:05	56,369	-921
15 Aug 2026, 08:44	57,290	+133
14 Aug 2026, 01:56	57,157	+992
12 Aug 2026, 17:54	56,165	+209
11 Aug 2026, 20:09	55,956	no change
11 Aug 2026, 15:38	55,956	+439
10 Aug 2026, 14:37	55,517	+598
9 Aug 2026, 15:12	54,919	+3,939
8 Aug 2026, 14:26	50,980	+2,051
7 Aug 2026, 11:10	48,929	+832
6 Aug 2026, 20:00	48,097	first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

مافیای رفرال | ناخدا
@Airdrop_Nakhoda · 16,7945 posts Розыгрыши Telegram Premium/Stars | Giveaways Премиум / Старс
@premslob · 9,0792 posts Stars2026free
@proverkabotovfx · 662 posts g
@swerfh · 22 posts چک های شخصی الترا وات
@Cheak_Oltra · 3381 post درآمددلاری
@daramaddolari10000 · 31 post 𝙎𝙏𝙍𝙀𝙀𝙏 𝙎𝙏𝘼𝙍𝙎
@KingStars_top · 1,5321 post Mr. Ashraf
@MrAshraf1000 · 671 post 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗶𝘁 𝗕𝗼𝘁𝘀
@Profit_Botss · 461 post 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗦 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘
@uiuplm9 · 421 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pix Stars” (@pix_starsbot), 56,763 monthly users as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pix_starsbot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.